Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948

Supreme Court clarifies “Economic Holding” under Bombay Tenancy Act: Kesha v. Muralidhar (2023)

Supreme Court Decides Land Resumption Rights Under Bombay Tenancy Act: Kesha v. Muralidhar (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of “economic holding” and land resumption rights under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. CASE TYPE: Land Tenancy Dispute Case Name: Kesha v. Muralidhar [Judgment Date]: 19 October 2023 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 19 October […]

Supreme Court clarifies “Economic Holding” under Bombay Tenancy Act: Kesha v. Muralidhar (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Restrictions on Agricultural Land Transfers via Wills: Vinodchandra Sakarlal Kapadia vs. State of Gujarat (2020)

Supreme Court Clarifies Restrictions on Agricultural Land Transfers via Wills: Vinodchandra Sakarlal Kapadia vs. State of Gujarat (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether agricultural land can be transferred to a non-agriculturist through a will under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. CASE TYPE: Land Law, Tenancy Law Case Name: Vinodchandra Sakarlal Kapadia etc. vs. State

Supreme Court Clarifies Restrictions on Agricultural Land Transfers via Wills: Vinodchandra Sakarlal Kapadia vs. State of Gujarat (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Tenant’s Deemed Purchase Rights under Bombay Tenancy Act: Bayaji Sambhu Mali vs. Nazir Mohammed Balal Zari (2019)

Supreme Court Upholds Tenant’s Deemed Purchase Rights under Bombay Tenancy Act: Bayaji Sambhu Mali vs. Nazir Mohammed Balal Zari (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a tenant is required to issue a notice under Section 32F(1A) of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, when the tenant is already deemed to have purchased the land under

Supreme Court Upholds Tenant’s Deemed Purchase Rights under Bombay Tenancy Act: Bayaji Sambhu Mali vs. Nazir Mohammed Balal Zari (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Landlord’s Right: Sakharam Ganesh Pujari vs. Husen Aba Bahadur (2017)

Can a tenant’s right to purchase land be extended indefinitely, even after the statutory period has expired? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case concerning the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Act, 1948. This judgment clarifies the timelines for tenants to exercise their purchase rights, especially when a landlord has served in

Supreme Court Upholds Landlord’s Right: Sakharam Ganesh Pujari vs. Husen Aba Bahadur (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles the requirement of notice under Section 32F of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 in land purchase cases: Tukaram Maruti Chavan vs. Maruti Narayan Chavan (2008) INSC 1486 (15 September 2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: 15 September 2008 Citation: (2008) INSC 1486 Judges: Tarun Chatterjee, J., Aftab Alam, J. Does a tenant automatically gain ownership of land if the landlord is a widow? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in Tukaram Maruti Chavan vs. Maruti Narayan Chavan, focusing on the mandatory nature

Supreme Court settles the requirement of notice under Section 32F of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 in land purchase cases: Tukaram Maruti Chavan vs. Maruti Narayan Chavan (2008) INSC 1486 (15 September 2008) Read Post »

Scroll to Top