Pension Scheme

Supreme Court Upholds Cut-off Date for Pension Scheme: Himachal Road Transport Corp. vs. Retired Employees Union (22 February 2021)

/ Ashok Bhushan, Central Civil Service (Pension) Rules, 1972, Contributory Provident Fund, Cut-off Date, Himachal Road Transport Corporation, Judges, M.R. Shah, Pension Scheme, Pension Scheme, R. Subhash Reddy, Service Law, The Road Transport Corporations Act, 1950

Supreme Court Upholds Cut-off Date for Pension Scheme: Himachal Road Transport Corp. vs. Retired Employees Union (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a cut-off date for implementing a pension scheme can be considered discriminatory when applied to employees who retired before that date and were already covered under a Contributory Provident Fund Scheme. CASE TYPE: Service Law […]

Supreme Court Upholds Cut-off Date for Pension Scheme: Himachal Road Transport Corp. vs. Retired Employees Union (22 February 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Exclusion of Notional Service Benefit in Special Voluntary Retirement Scheme: National Insurance Special Voluntary Retired/Retired Employees Association vs. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. (26 October 2018)

/ Judges, Kurian Joseph, Pension Law, Pension Law with General Insurance (Employees) Pension Scheme, 1995, Pension Scheme, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Service Law, Service Law with Section 17-A of the General Insurance Business (Nationalisation) Act, 1972, Voluntary Retirement Scheme

Supreme Court Upholds Exclusion of Notional Service Benefit in Special Voluntary Retirement Scheme: National Insurance Special Voluntary Retired/Retired Employees Association vs. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether employees who opted for a Special Voluntary Retirement Scheme (SVRS) are entitled to an additional notional benefit of five years of service for pension calculation,

Supreme Court Upholds Exclusion of Notional Service Benefit in Special Voluntary Retirement Scheme: National Insurance Special Voluntary Retired/Retired Employees Association vs. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. (26 October 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles the exclusion of additional service benefits in voluntary retirement schemes: National Insurance Special Voluntary Retired/Retired Employees Association & Anr. vs. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr. (26 October 2018)

/ General Insurance (Employees) Pension Scheme, 1995, General Insurance Business (Nationalisation) Act, 1972, General Insurance Business (Nationalisation) Act, 1972 with Section 17-A, Judges, Kurian Joseph, Pension Scheme, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Special Voluntary Retirement Scheme, 2004, Voluntary Retirement Scheme

Supreme Court Upholds Exclusion of Additional Service Benefit in Voluntary Retirement Scheme Date of the Judgment: 26 October 2018 Citation: 2018 INSC 944 Judges: Kurian Joseph, J., Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J. Can employees who opt for a special voluntary retirement scheme (SVRS) claim additional benefits from a previous pension scheme, despite explicit exclusions in the

Supreme Court settles the exclusion of additional service benefits in voluntary retirement schemes: National Insurance Special Voluntary Retired/Retired Employees Association & Anr. vs. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr. (26 October 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies confirmation rules for Jharkhand Judicial Service: Ashok Kumar vs. State of Jharkhand (2018)

/ Confirmation of Service, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 235, Constitutional Law with Article 309, J. Chelameswar, Judges, Judicial Service, Pension Scheme, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Service Law

Supreme Court clarifies confirmation rules for Jharkhand Judicial Service: Ashok Kumar vs. State of Jharkhand (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether passing a departmental Hindi examination is a mandatory condition for the confirmation of Civil Judges in Jharkhand, in addition to the examination conducted by the Judicial Academy. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Ashok Kumar &

Supreme Court clarifies confirmation rules for Jharkhand Judicial Service: Ashok Kumar vs. State of Jharkhand (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court directs High Court to reconsider pension dispute: Allahabad Bank vs. Ishwar Saran (2017) INSC 737

/ Judges, Kurian Joseph, Pension Law, Pension Regulations, Pension Scheme, R. Banumathi, Service Law

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether employees of Allahabad Bank are entitled to pension under the 1995 Regulations or the 2010 Scheme. CASE TYPE: Service Law/Pension Law Case Name: Allahabad Bank & Ors. vs. Ishwar Saran & Ors. Judgment Date: 07 September 2017 Date of the Judgment: 07 September 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 737 Judges: Kurian Joseph, J.,

Supreme Court directs High Court to reconsider pension dispute: Allahabad Bank vs. Ishwar Saran (2017) INSC 737 Read Post »

Scroll to Top