Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965

Supreme Court Upholds Termination for Concealing Criminal Cases in CRPF Recruitment: Union of India vs. Shishu Pal (2024)

/ Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965, Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965 with Rule 11, Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF), Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949, Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949 with Section 11, Service Law, Termination of Service, Verification Roll

Supreme Court Upholds Termination for Concealing Criminal Cases in CRPF Recruitment: Union of India vs. Shishu Pal (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an employer is justified in terminating an employee’s services for suppressing information about pending criminal cases in their verification roll. CASE TYPE: Service Law, specifically related to employment in the Central Reserve Police Force […]

Supreme Court Upholds Termination for Concealing Criminal Cases in CRPF Recruitment: Union of India vs. Shishu Pal (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies “as far as practicable” in sexual harassment inquiries: Aureliano Fernandes vs. State of Goa (2023)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Constitutional Law with Article 311, Disciplinary Proceedings, Fundamental Rights, Hima Kohli, Judges, Service Law

Supreme Court on Fair Inquiry in Sexual Harassment Cases: Aureliano Fernandes vs. State of Goa (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: The extent of adherence to principles of natural justice during inquiries into sexual harassment complaints at the workplace. CASE TYPE: Service Law, Sexual Harassment Case Name: Aureliano Fernandes vs. State of Goa and Others Judgment Date: 12

Supreme Court clarifies “as far as practicable” in sexual harassment inquiries: Aureliano Fernandes vs. State of Goa (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court quashes ex-post facto approval of charge memorandum in disciplinary proceedings: Sunny Abraham vs. Union of India (2021)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965, Disciplinary Proceedings, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Service Law, Service Law with Rule 14

Supreme Court quashes ex-post facto approval of charge memorandum in disciplinary proceedings: Sunny Abraham vs. Union of India (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a charge memorandum in disciplinary proceedings can be validated by ex-post facto approval from the disciplinary authority. CASE TYPE: Service Law; Disciplinary Proceedings Case Name: Sunny Abraham vs. Union of India & Anr.

Supreme Court quashes ex-post facto approval of charge memorandum in disciplinary proceedings: Sunny Abraham vs. Union of India (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles the issue of Disproportionate Punishment in Departmental Proceedings: Union of India vs. P. Balasubrahmanyam (04 March 2021)

/ Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965, Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965 with Rule 14, Departmental Proceedings, Disciplinary Proceedings, Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, Postal Manual Volume III, Postal Manual Volume III with Rule 12(v), Proportionality of Punishment, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Service Law

Supreme Court Upholds Tribunal’s Decision on Disproportionate Punishment in Departmental Proceedings Date of the Judgment: 04 March 2021 Citation: Civil Appeal Nos. 3592-3593 of 2020 Judges: Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J. and Hrishikesh Roy, J. Can a disciplinary authority impose a major penalty when the most serious charges against an employee are not proven? The Supreme

Supreme Court settles the issue of Disproportionate Punishment in Departmental Proceedings: Union of India vs. P. Balasubrahmanyam (04 March 2021) Read Post »

Scroll to Top