Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972

Supreme Court Denies Pension Benefit by Combining Gramin Dak Sevak Service with Regular Postal Service: Union of India & Ors. vs. Gandiba Behera (08 November 2019)

Date of the Judgment: 08 November 2019 Citation: 2019 INSC 1122 Judges: Ranjan Gogoi, CJI, Deepak Gupta J., Aniruddha Bose J. Can prior service as a Gramin Dak Sevak (GDS) be combined with regular postal service to meet pension eligibility? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in a batch of appeals, ultimately […]

Supreme Court Denies Pension Benefit by Combining Gramin Dak Sevak Service with Regular Postal Service: Union of India & Ors. vs. Gandiba Behera (08 November 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Denial of Pension to VSNL Employees with Less Than 10 Years of Service: P. Bandopadhya vs. Union of India (2019) INSC 216 (15 March 2019)

Supreme Court Upholds Denial of Pension to VSNL Employees with Less Than 10 Years of Service LEGAL ISSUE: Whether employees of a government department converted into a Public Sector Undertaking (PSU) are eligible for pensionary benefits under the Central Government if they had less than 10 years of qualifying service at the time of absorption

Supreme Court Upholds Denial of Pension to VSNL Employees with Less Than 10 Years of Service: P. Bandopadhya vs. Union of India (2019) INSC 216 (15 March 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Exclusion of Unpaid Leave for Pension Eligibility in VRS Cases: Delhi Transport Corporation vs. Balwan Singh & Ors. (26 February 2019)

Supreme Court Upholds Exclusion of Unpaid Leave for Pension Eligibility in VRS Cases LEGAL ISSUE: Whether periods of unauthorized absence, for which no salary is paid, can be excluded when calculating qualifying service for pension under the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972, specifically for employees who opted for the Voluntary Retirement Scheme (VRS). CASE

Supreme Court Upholds Exclusion of Unpaid Leave for Pension Eligibility in VRS Cases: Delhi Transport Corporation vs. Balwan Singh & Ors. (26 February 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of compassionate appointment: State of Himachal Pradesh vs. Shashi Kumar (2019)

Supreme Court Clarifies Compassionate Appointment Policy: State of Himachal Pradesh vs. Shashi Kumar (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether family pension and other terminal benefits can be included in the family income for denying compassionate appointment. CASE TYPE: Service Law – Compassionate Appointment Case Name: State of Himachal Pradesh & Anr. vs. Shashi Kumar [Judgment Date]: 16

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of compassionate appointment: State of Himachal Pradesh vs. Shashi Kumar (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Rules Special Pay Counts Towards Pension for Scientists in DRDO, DAE, and DOS (2019)

Supreme Court Rules Special Pay Counts Towards Pension for Scientists LEGAL ISSUE: Whether special pay granted to scientists should be included in the calculation of pension benefits. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Union of India & Ors. vs. Dr. O.P. Nijhawan & Ors. Judgment Date: 03 January 2019 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 03

Supreme Court Rules Special Pay Counts Towards Pension for Scientists in DRDO, DAE, and DOS (2019) Read Post »

Scroll to Top