Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949

Supreme Court Upholds Termination for Concealing Criminal Cases in CRPF Recruitment: Union of India vs. Shishu Pal (2024)

/ Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965, Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965 with Rule 11, Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF), Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949, Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949 with Section 11, Service Law, Termination of Service, Verification Roll

Supreme Court Upholds Termination for Concealing Criminal Cases in CRPF Recruitment: Union of India vs. Shishu Pal (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an employer is justified in terminating an employee’s services for suppressing information about pending criminal cases in their verification roll. CASE TYPE: Service Law, specifically related to employment in the Central Reserve Police Force […]

Supreme Court Upholds Termination for Concealing Criminal Cases in CRPF Recruitment: Union of India vs. Shishu Pal (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement Under CRPF Rules: Union of India vs. Santosh Kumar Tiwari (2024)

/ Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949, Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949 with Section 11, Disciplinary Proceedings, Rule Making Power, Service Law, Service Law with Rule 27, Central Reserve Police Force Rules, 1955

Supreme Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement Under CRPF Rules: Union of India vs. Santosh Kumar Tiwari (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the punishment of compulsory retirement can be imposed under the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) Rules, even if not explicitly mentioned in the CRPF Act. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Union of India & Ors.

Supreme Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement Under CRPF Rules: Union of India vs. Santosh Kumar Tiwari (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of CRPF Constable for Misconduct: Union of India vs. Sunil Kumar (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949, Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949 with Section 10, Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949 with Section 11, Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949 with Section 9, Disciplinary Proceedings, Judges, Judicial Review, M. R. Shah, Service Law

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of CRPF Constable for Misconduct: Union of India vs. Sunil Kumar (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the penalty of dismissal imposed on a member of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) for misconduct, including misbehavior and insubordination while under the influence of alcohol, is justified, even if the misconduct occurred while not

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of CRPF Constable for Misconduct: Union of India vs. Sunil Kumar (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of CRPF Constable for Misconduct: Union of India vs. Sunil Kumar (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949, Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949 with Section 10, Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949 with Section 11, Disciplinary Proceedings, Judges, M. R. Shah, Service Law

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of CRPF Constable for Misconduct: Union of India vs. Sunil Kumar (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was justified in interfering with the disciplinary authority’s order of dismissal of a CRPF constable for misconduct, and whether the penalty of dismissal was disproportionate to the offense. CASE TYPE: Service Law, Disciplinary

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of CRPF Constable for Misconduct: Union of India vs. Sunil Kumar (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Order in CRPF Misconduct Case: Union of India vs. Suresh Kumar Singh (2022) INSC 503 (01 June 2022)

/ B.R. Gavai, Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949, Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949 with Section 11, Departmental Proceedings, Hima Kohli, Judges, Principles of Natural Justice, Service Law

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Order in CRPF Misconduct Case Date of the Judgment: 01 June 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 503 Judges: Hon’ble Mr. Justice B.R. Gavai and Hon’ble Ms. Justice Hima Kohli Can a departmental inquiry be considered valid if crucial witnesses are not examined? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Order in CRPF Misconduct Case: Union of India vs. Suresh Kumar Singh (2022) INSC 503 (01 June 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of CRPF Constable for Misuse of Service Weapon: Union of India vs. Dalbir Singh (21 September 2021)

/ Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949, Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949 with Section 11(1), Departmental Inquiry, Hemant Gupta, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 307, Judges, Judicial Review, Service Law, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of CRPF Constable for Misuse of Service Weapon: Union of India vs. Dalbir Singh (2021) Date of the Judgment: 21 September 2021 Citation: CIVIL APPEAL NO.5848 OF 2021 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) NO. 24095 OF 2019) Judges: Hemant Gupta, J., V. Ramasubramanian, J. Can a disciplinary authority dismiss a member

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of CRPF Constable for Misuse of Service Weapon: Union of India vs. Dalbir Singh (21 September 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal for Negligent Weapon Handling in CRPF: Union of India vs. Sitaram Mishra (2019)

/ Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949, Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949 with Section 11(1), Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Disciplinary Proceedings, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 304, Indira Banerjee, Judges, Negligence, Service Law

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal for Negligent Weapon Handling in CRPF: Union of India vs. Sitaram Mishra (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a member of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) can be dismissed for negligently handling a weapon, resulting in a co-worker’s death, despite being acquitted in a criminal trial for the same incident. CASE TYPE:

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal for Negligent Weapon Handling in CRPF: Union of India vs. Sitaram Mishra (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Disciplinary Inquiry: Union of India vs. Ram Lakhan Sharma (2018)

/ Adarsh Kumar Goel, Ashok Bhushan, Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949, Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949 with Section 11(1), Central Reserve Police Force Rules, 1955, Central Reserve Police Force Rules, 1955 with Rule 27, Departmental Inquiry, Disciplinary Proceedings, Judges, Principles of Natural Justice, Service Law

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Disciplinary Inquiry: Union of India vs. Ram Lakhan Sharma (2018) Date of the Judgment: 02 July 2018 Citation: 2018 INSC 605 Judges: Adarsh Kumar Goel, J., Ashok Bhushan, J. (authored the judgment) Can a disciplinary inquiry be deemed fair if the Inquiry Officer also acts as the prosecutor?

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Disciplinary Inquiry: Union of India vs. Ram Lakhan Sharma (2018) Read Post »

Scroll to Top