Civil Law

Supreme Court Reverses Adverse Possession Claim: Brijesh Kumar vs. Shardabai (2019)

/ Adverse Possession, Civil Law, Indira Banerjee, Judges, Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959, Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 with Section 115, Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 with Section 117, Navin Sinha, Property Law

Supreme Court Reverses Adverse Possession Claim: Brijesh Kumar vs. Shardabai (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the plaintiff had perfected title by adverse possession. CASE TYPE: Civil Law – Property Dispute Case Name: Brijesh Kumar and Another vs. Shardabai (Dead) By Lrs. and Others [Judgment Date]: October 1, 2019 Date of the Judgment: October 1, 2019 Citation: […]

Supreme Court Reverses Adverse Possession Claim: Brijesh Kumar vs. Shardabai (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Identifies Land Parcel in Andhra Pradesh Land Dispute: Government of Andhra Pradesh vs. Grace Sathyavathy Shashikant (2019)

/ Civil Law, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Land Law, Property Disputes, R.F. Nariman, Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Identifies Land Parcel in Andhra Pradesh Land Dispute: Government of Andhra Pradesh vs. Grace Sathyavathy Shashikant (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Identification of a specific land parcel and its rightful ownership in a long-standing dispute. CASE TYPE: Civil Dispute, Land Law. Case Name: The Government of Andhra Pradesh & Ors. vs. Grace Sathyavathy Shashikant &

Supreme Court Identifies Land Parcel in Andhra Pradesh Land Dispute: Government of Andhra Pradesh vs. Grace Sathyavathy Shashikant (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order on Burden of Proof in Property Dispute: Ali Hussain vs. Rabiya (2019)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Burden of Proof, Civil Law, Evidence Law, Judges, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, N.V. Ramana, Property Law

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order on Burden of Proof in Property Dispute: Ali Hussain vs. Rabiya (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Determining the burden of proof in cases involving alleged fraudulent property transactions, particularly when the transferor claims to be an illiterate woman. CASE TYPE: Civil Property Dispute Case Name: Ali Hussain (D) Through Lrs

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order on Burden of Proof in Property Dispute: Ali Hussain vs. Rabiya (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order on Encroachment: Pradeep Singh Bisht vs. State of Uttarakhand (2019)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Civil Law, Deepak Gupta, Encroachment, Judges, Municipal Corporation, Municipal Corporation Act, Ranjan Gogoi, Statutory Law

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order on Encroachment: Pradeep Singh Bisht vs. State of Uttarakhand (2019) The Supreme Court of India, on July 19, 2019, addressed a case regarding alleged encroachments and unauthorized constructions. The core issue was whether the High Court could order eviction based solely on an Advocate-Commissioner’s report, without the Municipal

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order on Encroachment: Pradeep Singh Bisht vs. State of Uttarakhand (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Dispute Case: Rajesh vs. State of Maharashtra (2019)

/ Ashok Bhushan, Civil Appeals, Civil Law, Judges, Land Dispute, Navin Sinha, Supreme Court Judgments

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Dispute Case: Rajesh vs. State of Maharashtra (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the appeal should be dismissed based on the reasons provided in a related case. CASE TYPE: Civil Case Name: Rajesh s/o Shrirambapu Fate vs. State of Maharashtra & ors. Judgment Date: 19 July 2019 Introduction Date of the

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Dispute Case: Rajesh vs. State of Maharashtra (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Banking Operations in Hamdard Laboratories Dispute: Hammad Ahmed vs. Abdul Majeed (2019) INSC 657 (09 July 2019)

/ Civil Dispute, Civil Law, Hemant Gupta, Inherent Powers of the Court, Interpretation of Court Orders, Judges, Order Clarification, Supreme Court of India, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Clarifies Banking Operations in Hamdard Laboratories Dispute LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of a previous Supreme Court order regarding the management of Hamdard Laboratories and its banking operations. CASE TYPE: Civil Dispute Case Name: Hammad Ahmed vs. Abdul Majeed and Ors. Judgment Date: 09 July 2019 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 09 July 2019 Citation:

Supreme Court Clarifies Banking Operations in Hamdard Laboratories Dispute: Hammad Ahmed vs. Abdul Majeed (2019) INSC 657 (09 July 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Rights in Joint Family Property After Reconveyance: Doddmuniyappa vs. Muniswamy (2019)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, Ajay Rastogi, Civil Law, Compromise Decree, Coparcenary Rights, Hindu Law, Joint Family Property, Judges, Property Rights, Reconveyance

Supreme Court Clarifies Rights in Joint Family Property After Reconveyance: Doddmuniyappa vs. Muniswamy (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a compromise decree entered into by some coparceners without the consent of other coparceners is binding on the latter, especially when the property has been reconveyed and has assumed the character of joint family property. CASE TYPE: Civil

Supreme Court Clarifies Rights in Joint Family Property After Reconveyance: Doddmuniyappa vs. Muniswamy (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Concurrent Findings on Collusive Decree in Property Dispute: Jaswant Singh & Ors. vs. Jaspal Singh & Ors. (2019) INSC 459 (07 May 2019)

/ Civil Law, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Collusive Decree, Decree, Judges, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, N.V. Ramana, Property Law, Sale Deed

Supreme Court Upholds Concurrent Findings on Collusive Decree in Property Dispute Date of the Judgment: 07 May 2019 Citation: (2019) INSC 459 Judges: N.V. Ramana, J. and Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, J. Can a court decree be challenged if it is found to be collusive and aimed at circumventing the law? The Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court Upholds Concurrent Findings on Collusive Decree in Property Dispute: Jaswant Singh & Ors. vs. Jaspal Singh & Ors. (2019) INSC 459 (07 May 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Settles Property Dispute Through Amicable Settlement: Piara Singh vs. Kundan Singh (2019)

/ Civil Law, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XXIII, Judges, Property Law, R. Banumathi, S. Abdul Nazeer, Settlement

Supreme Court Settles Property Dispute Through Amicable Settlement: Piara Singh vs. Kundan Singh (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Property dispute resolution through amicable settlement. CASE TYPE: Civil Case Name: Piara Singh (Since Deceased) Through His Lrs. Gurmeet Singh & Ors. vs. Kundan Singh (D) Thr. His Legal Heirs Jagjit Singh & Ors. Judgment Date: April 30, 2019

Supreme Court Settles Property Dispute Through Amicable Settlement: Piara Singh vs. Kundan Singh (2019) Read Post »

Abatement of Appeals: Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Dispute: Goli Vijayalakshmi & Ors. vs. Yendru Sathiraju (26 April 2019)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, Abatement of Appeals, Ajay Rastogi, Civil Law, Civil Procedure, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order 22, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order 41, Judges, Property Law

Supreme Court Abatement Ruling: Goli Vijayalakshmi vs. Yendru Sathiraju (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an appeal abates in its entirety when one of the appellants dies and their legal representatives are not brought on record, particularly in cases involving joint and indivisible decrees. CASE TYPE: Civil Property Dispute Case Name: Goli Vijayalakshmi & Ors. vs. Yendru

Abatement of Appeals: Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Dispute: Goli Vijayalakshmi & Ors. vs. Yendru Sathiraju (26 April 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Restores Possession After Ex-Parte Decree Set Aside: Om Prakash Ram vs. State of Bihar (2019)

/ Civil Law, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order IX, Due Process, Ex-parte Decree, Judges, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, N.V. Ramana, Restoration of Possession

Supreme Court Restores Possession After Ex-Parte Decree Set Aside: Om Prakash Ram vs. State of Bihar (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether possession obtained through an ex-parte decree can be sustained if the decree is subsequently set aside. CASE TYPE: Civil Case Name: Om Prakash Ram vs. The State of Bihar & Ors. Judgment Date: April 15,

Supreme Court Restores Possession After Ex-Parte Decree Set Aside: Om Prakash Ram vs. State of Bihar (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Co-sharer Rights in Property Dispute: T. Ramalingeswara Rao vs. N. Madhava Rao (2019)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Civil Law, Co-sharer Rights, Dinesh Maheshwari, Judges, Property Law

Supreme Court Upholds Co-sharer Rights in Property Dispute: T. Ramalingeswara Rao vs. N. Madhava Rao (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a co-sharer can claim a perpetual injunction against another co-sharer regarding a joint property. CASE TYPE: Civil Property Law Case Name: T. Ramalingeswara Rao (Dead) Thr. LRs. & Anr. vs. N. Madhava Rao & Ors. Judgment

Supreme Court Upholds Co-sharer Rights in Property Dispute: T. Ramalingeswara Rao vs. N. Madhava Rao (2019) Read Post »

Scroll to Top