Permanent Injunction

Supreme Court Rejects Claim of Ownership Based on Conflicting Pleas of Sale Deed and Adverse Possession: Kesar Bai vs. Genda Lal (2022) INSC 1005 (14 October 2022)

/ Adverse Possession, Civil Procedure, Judges, Krishna Murari, M.R. Shah, Permanent Injunction, Property Law, Sale Deed

Supreme Court Rejects Claim of Ownership Based on Conflicting Pleas of Sale Deed and Adverse Possession Date of the Judgment: 14 October 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 1005 Judges: M.R. Shah, J., Krishna Murari, J. Can a person claim ownership of a property based on both a sale deed and adverse possession simultaneously? The Supreme Court […]

Supreme Court Rejects Claim of Ownership Based on Conflicting Pleas of Sale Deed and Adverse Possession: Kesar Bai vs. Genda Lal (2022) INSC 1005 (14 October 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns High Court ruling on permanent injunction based on unregistered sale agreement: Balram Singh vs. Kelo Devi (2022) INSC 447

/ Agreements, Civil Law, Judges, Krishna Murari, M.R. Shah, Permanent Injunction, Specific Relief Act, 1963, Specific Relief Act, 1963 with Section 10, Unregistered Documents

Supreme Court overturns High Court ruling on permanent injunction based on unregistered sale agreement: Balram Singh vs. Kelo Devi (2022) INSC 447 LEGAL ISSUE: Can a permanent injunction be granted based on an unregistered agreement to sell? CASE TYPE: Civil Law Case Name: Balram Singh vs. Kelo Devi [Judgment Date]: 23 September 2022 Date of

Supreme Court overturns High Court ruling on permanent injunction based on unregistered sale agreement: Balram Singh vs. Kelo Devi (2022) INSC 447 Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Rights Based on Patta: Nagar Palika Raisinghnagar vs. Rameshwar Lal (2017)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Injunction, Judges, Land Disputes, Patta, Permanent Injunction, Property Law, R.K. Agrawal

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a person can claim permanent injunction on the basis of a Patta granted to their predecessor-in-title. CASE TYPE: Civil Law – Property Dispute Case Name: Nagar Palika Raisinghnagar vs. Rameshwar Lal & Anr. Judgment Date: 10 October 2017 Date of the Judgment: 10 October 2017 Citation: Civil Appeal No.10833 of 2010 Judges:

Supreme Court Upholds Land Rights Based on Patta: Nagar Palika Raisinghnagar vs. Rameshwar Lal (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies liability for Provident Fund dues between Holding and Subsidiary Companies: Regional Provident Fund Commissioner vs. ABS Spinning Orissa Ltd. (2008)

/ Civil Law, Dalveer Bhandari, Declaration, H.S. Bedi, Judges, Permanent Injunction, Punjab Land Reforms Act, 1972, Punjab Land Reforms Act, 1972 with Section 166

Date of the Judgment: October 1, 2008 Judges: Tarun Chatterjee, J., Aftab Alam, J. Can a holding company be held responsible for the Provident Fund dues of its subsidiary? The Supreme Court addressed this question in a case between the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner and ABS Spinning Orissa Ltd. The court clarified that a subsidiary

Supreme Court clarifies liability for Provident Fund dues between Holding and Subsidiary Companies: Regional Provident Fund Commissioner vs. ABS Spinning Orissa Ltd. (2008) Read Post »

Scroll to Top