Civil Procedure Code, 1908

Supreme Court clarifies mandatory nature of pre-institution mediation under Commercial Courts Act: Dhanbad Fuels vs. Union of India (2025) INSC 696 (15 May 2025)

/ Civil Procedure, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Commercial Courts Act, 2015, J.B. Pardiwala, Judges, Order VII Rule 11, CPC, Pre-Institution Mediation, R. Mahadevan, Section 12A, Commercial Courts Act, 2015

Introduction Date of the Judgment: 15 May 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 696 Judges: J.B. Pardiwala, J., R. Mahadevan, J. (Majority opinion by J.B. Pardiwala, J.) Is pre-institution mediation mandatory for commercial suits? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in M/S Dhanbad Fuels Private Limited vs. Union of India & Anr., clarifying the […]

Supreme Court clarifies mandatory nature of pre-institution mediation under Commercial Courts Act: Dhanbad Fuels vs. Union of India (2025) INSC 696 (15 May 2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds “Pay and Recover” Order in Motor Accident Case Involving Hazardous Goods: Chatha Service Station vs. Lalmati Devi (2025)

/ Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Civil Procedure Code, 1908 with Order 41 Rule 27, Judges, K. Vinod Chandran, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 with Section 11, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 with Section 14, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 with Section 41, Sudhanshu Dhulia

Introduction Date of the Judgment: April 08, 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 468 Judges: Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia, Justice K. Vinod Chandran Can an insurance company be directed to “pay and recover” compensation in a motor accident case where the driver of the offending vehicle, carrying hazardous goods, lacked the necessary endorsement on their license? The Supreme

Supreme Court Upholds “Pay and Recover” Order in Motor Accident Case Involving Hazardous Goods: Chatha Service Station vs. Lalmati Devi (2025) Read Post »

Scroll to Top