Civil Procedure Code, 1908 with Order 41 Rule 19

Supreme Court Restores Appeal Dismissed in Default: Mysore Urban Development Authority vs. S.S. Sarvesh (2019) INSC 66

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Appeals, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Civil Procedure Code, 1908 with Order 41 Rule 19, Civil Procedure Code, 1908 with Order 43 Rule 1(t), Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 227, Dinesh Maheshwari, Judges

Supreme Court Restores Appeal Dismissed in Default: Mysore Urban Development Authority vs. S.S. Sarvesh LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an appeal dismissed for default can be restored if sufficient cause is shown. CASE TYPE: Civil Appeal Case Name: The Commissioner, Mysore Urban Development Authority vs. S.S. Sarvesh Judgment Date: 05 February 2019 Date of the Judgment: 05 […]

Supreme Court Restores Appeal Dismissed in Default: Mysore Urban Development Authority vs. S.S. Sarvesh (2019) INSC 66 Read Post »

Supreme Court Remands Arbitration Appeal for Fresh Hearing: Navnirman Development Consultants vs. Divisional Commissioner (2017)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 11(6), Arbitration Law with Section 37, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Civil Procedure Code, 1908 with Order 41 Rule 17, Civil Procedure Code, 1908 with Order 41 Rule 19, Judges, R. Banumathi

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court erred in dismissing an arbitration appeal without proper consideration of facts and legal grounds. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: The Navnirman Development Consultants (I) Pvt. Ltd. vs. The Divisional Commissioner & President District Sports Complex Executive Committee [Judgment Date]: July 05, 2017 Date of the Judgment: July 05,

Supreme Court Remands Arbitration Appeal for Fresh Hearing: Navnirman Development Consultants vs. Divisional Commissioner (2017) Read Post »

Scroll to Top