Civil Procedure Code, 1908 with Order IX Rule 13

Supreme Court clarifies procedure for appealing ex-parte decrees: Mamtaz & Ors. vs. Gulsuma Alias Kulusuma (2022)

/ Appeals, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Civil Procedure Code, 1908 with Order IX Rule 13, Civil Procedure Code, 1908 with Section 96, Judges, M.R. Shah, Sanjiv Khanna

Supreme Court clarifies procedure for appealing ex-parte decrees: Mamtaz & Ors. vs. Gulsuma Alias Kulusuma (2022) Date of the Judgment: 18 January 2022 Citation: [Not Available in Source] Judges: M.R. Shah, J., Sanjiv Khanna, J. Can a High Court, while hearing a second appeal against a dismissal of a first appeal due to delay, set […]

Supreme Court clarifies procedure for appealing ex-parte decrees: Mamtaz & Ors. vs. Gulsuma Alias Kulusuma (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies procedure for appealing ex-parte decrees: Mamtaz & Ors. vs. Gulsuma Alias Kulusuma (2022)

/ Appeals, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Civil Procedure Code, 1908 with Order IX Rule 13, Civil Procedure Code, 1908 with Section 96, Judges, M.R. Shah, Sanjiv Khanna

Supreme Court clarifies procedure for appealing ex-parte decrees: Mamtaz & Ors. vs. Gulsuma Alias Kulusuma (2022) Date of the Judgment: 18 January 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 33 Judges: M.R. Shah, J., Sanjiv Khanna, J. Can a High Court, while hearing a second appeal against a dismissal of a first appeal, set aside the original trial

Supreme Court clarifies procedure for appealing ex-parte decrees: Mamtaz & Ors. vs. Gulsuma Alias Kulusuma (2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top