Introduction Date of the Judgment: March 6, 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 333 Judges: Sanjay Karol J., Prashant Kumar Mishra J. In a dispute between a landlord and a tenant over shop rooms, the Supreme Court of India examined whether the High Court of Orissa was correct in overturning the concurrent findings of the lower courts. […]
Supreme Court Reverses High Court Decision on Specific Performance of Contract: Jaichand vs. Sahnulal (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court erred in overturning the first appellate court’s decision regarding the readiness and willingness of the plaintiff in a suit for specific performance of a contract. CASE TYPE: Civil (Contract Law) Case Name: Jaichand (Dead)
Supreme Court clarifies specific performance in sale agreement: T.D. Vivek Kumar vs. Ranbir Chaudhary (2023) Date of the Judgment: 28 April 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 462 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and C.T. Ravikumar, J. Can a buyer demand specific performance of a sale agreement if the agreement itself stipulates a remedy for non-performance? The Supreme
Supreme Court Upholds Adoption: Chandrabhan’s Inheritance Claim | Civil Law Date of the Judgment: 22 September 2022 Citation: [Not Available in Source] Judges: Indira Banerjee, J. and J.K. Maheshwari, J. Can a High Court overturn a well-reasoned judgment of a lower appellate court based on a reassessment of facts? The Supreme Court addressed this critical
Supreme Court orders fresh consideration of property dispute: Narayan Sitaramji Badwaik vs. Bisaram (2021) INSC 71 LEGAL ISSUE: The proper procedure for a High Court to follow when dealing with a second appeal where the first appellate court has erred in its assessment of facts and law. CASE TYPE: Civil Case Name: Narayan Sitaramji Badwaik
LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a High Court, after upholding a lower court’s finding on land ownership, can make observations that could potentially reopen the settled issue of title. CASE TYPE: Civil Law, Land Resumption Case Name: Union of India vs. Vijay Krishna Uniyal (D) through L.Rs. Judgment Date: 23 October 2017 Date of the Judgment: 23
