Review Petition

Supreme Court Upholds Joint Family Business Claim in Property Dispute: Vitthalrao Marotirao Navkhare vs. Nanibai (Dead) (2024) INSC 283

/ Civil Procedure Code, Hindu Law, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 32, Joint Family Business, Joint Hindu Family, Review Petition, Second Appeal, Statements by persons who cannot be called as witness

Supreme Court Upholds Joint Family Business Claim in Property Dispute: Vitthalrao Marotirao Navkhare vs. Nanibai (Dead) (2024) INSC 283 LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a business run by brothers is a joint family business, entitling them to a share in the properties purchased from its income. CASE TYPE: Civil (Property Partition) Case Name: Vitthalrao Marotirao Navkhare vs. […]

Supreme Court Upholds Joint Family Business Claim in Property Dispute: Vitthalrao Marotirao Navkhare vs. Nanibai (Dead) (2024) INSC 283 Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds State’s Secured Creditor Status under GVAT Act in IBC Proceedings: Sanjay Kumar Agarwal vs. State Tax Officer (2023) INSC 963 (31 October 2023)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, Code of Civil Procedure with Order XLVII Rule 1, Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003, Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003 with Section 48, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 with Section 3(30), Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 with Section 53, Review Petition, Secured Creditor

Supreme Court Upholds State’s Secured Creditor Status under GVAT Act in IBC Proceedings: Sanjay Kumar Agarwal vs. State Tax Officer (2023) INSC 963 (31 October 2023) Date of the Judgment: 31 October 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 963 Judges: A.S. Bopanna, J. and Bela M. Trivedi, J. Can a State’s claim under the Gujarat Value Added

Supreme Court Upholds State’s Secured Creditor Status under GVAT Act in IBC Proceedings: Sanjay Kumar Agarwal vs. State Tax Officer (2023) INSC 963 (31 October 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies procedure for review petitions: Suresh G. Ramnani vs. Aurelia Ana De Piedade Miranda (2022) INSC 546

/ Aniruddha Bose, Bombay High Court Rules, Bombay High Court Rules with Chapter XXX Rule 3(1), Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order 47 Rule 5, G.S. Patel, Judges, Prithviraj K. Chavan, Review Petition, Vikram Nath

Supreme Court clarifies procedure for review petitions: Suresh G. Ramnani vs. Aurelia Ana De Piedade Miranda (2022) INSC 546 LEGAL ISSUE: Procedure for handling review petitions when the original judge is available. CASE TYPE: Civil Procedure Case Name: Suresh G. Ramnani vs. Aurelia Ana De Piedade Miranda @ Ariya Alvares (Dead Thr. Lrs) & Ors.

Supreme Court clarifies procedure for review petitions: Suresh G. Ramnani vs. Aurelia Ana De Piedade Miranda (2022) INSC 546 Read Post »

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition Due to Delay in D. Laxmamma vs. S. Halappa (1 November 2022)

/ Civil Law, Delay in filing, Judges, Limitation Act, Review Petition, Sanjiv Khanna, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition in D. Laxmamma vs. S. Halappa LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a review petition can be dismissed due to an unreasonable delay in filing. CASE TYPE: Civil. Case Name: D. Laxmamma vs. S. Halappa and Ors. Judgment Date: 1 November 2022. Introduction Date of the Judgment: 1 November 2022 Citation: Not Available

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition Due to Delay in D. Laxmamma vs. S. Halappa (1 November 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition in Insolvency Case: Vishal Vijay Kalantri vs. Shailen Shah (2022) INSC 429

/ Ajay Rastogi, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 with Section 62, Judges, Review Jurisdiction, Review Petition, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition in Insolvency Case: Vishal Vijay Kalantri vs. Shailen Shah (2022) INSC 429 Date of the Judgment: May 04, 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 429 Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, J. and Ajay Rastogi, J. Can a review petition be entertained if it does not present any new grounds for reconsideration? The Supreme

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition in Insolvency Case: Vishal Vijay Kalantri vs. Shailen Shah (2022) INSC 429 Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Criminal Case: Indra Deo Tiwari vs. State of U.P. (2022)

/ Acquittal, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Criminal Law, Judges, Review Petition, S. Ravindra Bhat, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Criminal Case: Indra Deo Tiwari vs. State of U.P. (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was correct in affirming the Trial Court’s decision of acquittal in a criminal case. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Indra Deo Tiwari vs. State of U.P. & Ors. Judgment Date: May 04, 2022 Introduction

Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Criminal Case: Indra Deo Tiwari vs. State of U.P. (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal in P.S. Patel vs. State Bank of Saurashtra (2022)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Judges, Review Petition, Special Leave Petition, Supreme Court of India, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal in P.S. Patel vs. State Bank of Saurashtra (2022) Date of the Judgment: March 15, 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 221 Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, J. and Ajay Rastogi, J. Can a review petition be entertained if there is no apparent error on record? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal in P.S. Patel vs. State Bank of Saurashtra (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Rejects Review Petition on Uttar Pradesh Teacher Recruitment: Vijay Pratap Yadav vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (23 February 2022)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Judges, Review Jurisdiction, Review Petition, Service Law, State of Uttar Pradesh, Supreme Court of India, Teacher Recruitment, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Rejects Review Petition on Uttar Pradesh Teacher Recruitment: Vijay Pratap Yadav vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a review petition filed by non-parties to a previous litigation should be entertained when the issue has been considered multiple times. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Vijay Pratap Yadav and Ors. vs.

Supreme Court Rejects Review Petition on Uttar Pradesh Teacher Recruitment: Vijay Pratap Yadav vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (23 February 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Rejects Review Petition on Uttar Pradesh Teacher Recruitment: Vijay Pratap Yadav vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (23 February 2022)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Judges, Review Petition, Service Law, State of U.P and others v. Shiv Kumar Pathak and others, Teacher Recruitment, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Rejects Review Petition on Uttar Pradesh Teacher Recruitment: Vijay Pratap Yadav vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a review petition filed by non-parties to an earlier litigation regarding a teacher recruitment process should be entertained. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Vijay Pratap Yadav and Ors. vs. State of Uttar

Supreme Court Rejects Review Petition on Uttar Pradesh Teacher Recruitment: Vijay Pratap Yadav vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (23 February 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition on Allahabad High Court Order: Abhinitam Upadhyay vs. Allahabad High Court (2022)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Judges, Review Petition, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition on Allahabad High Court Order: Abhinitam Upadhyay vs. Allahabad High Court (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Review of a previous order of the Supreme Court. CASE TYPE: Civil Review Petition Case Name: Abhinitam Upadhyay vs. Hon’ble Allahabad High Court Through Its Registrar General [Judgment Date]: January 11, 2022 Date of the Judgment:

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition on Allahabad High Court Order: Abhinitam Upadhyay vs. Allahabad High Court (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition Due to Delay: Surender Mohan vs. State of Haryana (2022)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Civil Law, Delay, Judges, Limitation Act, Review Petition, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition Due to Delay: Surender Mohan vs. State of Haryana (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a review petition can be entertained despite an unexplained and substantial delay. CASE TYPE: Civil Review Petition Case Name: Surender Mohan vs. State of Haryana and Another [Judgment Date]: January 11, 2022 Introduction Date of the Judgment:

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition Due to Delay: Surender Mohan vs. State of Haryana (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition on Allahabad High Court Order: Abhinitam Upadhyay vs. Allahabad High Court (2022)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Civil Law, Judges, Judicial Review, Review Petition, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition on Allahabad High Court Order: Abhinitam Upadhyay vs. Allahabad High Court (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Review of a previous order of the Supreme Court. CASE TYPE: Civil Review Petition. Case Name: Abhinitam Upadhyay vs. Hon’ble Allahabad High Court. [Judgment Date]: January 11, 2022. Introduction Date of the Judgment: January 11, 2022.

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition on Allahabad High Court Order: Abhinitam Upadhyay vs. Allahabad High Court (2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top