Civil Procedure Law

Supreme Court Addresses Compensation for Vacant Medical Seats Due to Interim Orders: Ramkrishna Medical College vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2024)

/ Civil Procedure Law, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Interim Orders, Judicial Review, Restitution

Supreme Court Addresses Compensation for Vacant Medical Seats Due to Interim Orders: Ramkrishna Medical College vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2024) Date of the Judgment: 7th November 2024 Citation: 2024 INSC 845 Judges: B.R. Gavai, J. and K.V. Viswanathan, J. Can interim court orders, intended to protect individual student interests, inadvertently harm educational institutions? The […]

Supreme Court Addresses Compensation for Vacant Medical Seats Due to Interim Orders: Ramkrishna Medical College vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Return of Documents in Medical Fee Dispute: Sahil Bhargava vs. State of Uttarakhand (2024)

/ Education Law, Fee Regulation, Interim Orders, Private Educational Institutions, Uttarakhand Unaided Private Professional Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admission and Fixation of Fee) Act, 2006, Uttarakhand Unaided Private Professional Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admission and Fixation of Fee) Act, 2006 with Section 12, Uttarakhand Unaided Private Professional Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admission and Fixation of Fee) Act, 2006 with Section 2, Uttarakhand Unaided Private Professional Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admission and Fixation of Fee) Act, 2006 with Section 4

Supreme Court Directs Return of Documents in Medical Fee Dispute: Sahil Bhargava vs. State of Uttarakhand (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether students should be allowed to pursue their postgraduate studies and practice medicine when a dispute over college fees is pending before the High Court. CASE TYPE: Education Law, specifically relating to fee regulation in private

Supreme Court Directs Return of Documents in Medical Fee Dispute: Sahil Bhargava vs. State of Uttarakhand (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Sets Aside Stay on Investigation in Money Laundering Case: Directorate of Enforcement vs. Niraj Tyagi & Ors. (2024)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 438, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 482, Criminal Investigation, Criminal Law, Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR), Financial Law, Interim Orders, Interim Relief, Judicial Review, Loan Defaults, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, SARFAESI Act, Stay of Proceedings, Supreme Court Judgments

Supreme Court Sets Aside Stay on Investigation in Money Laundering Case: Directorate of Enforcement vs. Niraj Tyagi & Ors. (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether High Courts can stay investigations in criminal cases and proceedings under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA). CASE TYPE: Criminal, Money Laundering. Case Name: Directorate of Enforcement vs. Niraj Tyagi

Supreme Court Sets Aside Stay on Investigation in Money Laundering Case: Directorate of Enforcement vs. Niraj Tyagi & Ors. (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies “Change in Law” compensation in electricity contracts: GMR Warora Energy vs. CERC (20 April 2023)

/ B.R. Gavai, Carrying Cost, Change in Law, Contract Law, Electricity Law, Interpretation of Contracts, Judges, Power Purchase Agreement, Restitution, Vikram Nath

Date of the Judgment: 20 April 2023 Citation: Not Available in the provided document. Judges: B.R. Gavai, J. and Vikram Nath, J. Can changes in government policies and regulations lead to compensation in electricity contracts? The Supreme Court of India addressed this crucial question in a batch of appeals concerning power purchase agreements (PPAs). The

Supreme Court clarifies “Change in Law” compensation in electricity contracts: GMR Warora Energy vs. CERC (20 April 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies ‘Change in Law’ compensation in power purchase agreements: GMR Warora Energy Limited vs. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (20 April 2023)

/ B.R. Gavai, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 12, Constitutional Law with Article 268, Contract Law, Judges, Power Purchase Agreements, Restitution, Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Clarifies ‘Change in Law’ Compensation in Power Purchase Agreements Date of the Judgment: 20 April 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 398 Judges: B.R. Gavai, J. and Vikram Nath, J. Can power generating companies claim compensation for increased costs due to changes in government policies or regulations? The Supreme Court of India addressed this crucial

Supreme Court clarifies ‘Change in Law’ compensation in power purchase agreements: GMR Warora Energy Limited vs. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (20 April 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Change in Law Relief under SHAKTI Policy for Power Generators: Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited vs. Adani Power Maharashtra Limited (20 April 2023)

/ B.R. Gavai, Change in Law, Contract Law, Electricity Act, 2003, Electricity Law, Interpretation of Contracts, Judges, Power Purchase Agreement, Restitution, Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Upholds Change in Law Relief under SHAKTI Policy for Power Generators LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the introduction of the SHAKTI Policy constitutes a ‘Change in Law’ event under Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs). CASE TYPE: Electricity Regulatory Law, Contract Law Case Name: Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited vs. Adani Power Maharashtra Limited and Another

Supreme Court Upholds Change in Law Relief under SHAKTI Policy for Power Generators: Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited vs. Adani Power Maharashtra Limited (20 April 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders Restitution in Unitech Land Sale Case: Bhupinder Singh vs. Unitech Limited (23 March 2023)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 144, D.Y. Chandrachud, Judges, M.R. Shah, Restitution

Supreme Court Orders Restitution in Unitech Land Sale Case: Bhupinder Singh vs. Unitech Limited (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Applicability of the principle of restitution in cases where a court order is found to be erroneous. CASE TYPE: Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Case Name: Bhupinder Singh vs. Unitech Limited Judgment Date: 23 March 2023 Date of the Judgment:

Supreme Court Orders Restitution in Unitech Land Sale Case: Bhupinder Singh vs. Unitech Limited (23 March 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Rejects Recall of Order on Noida/Greater Noida Builders’ Interest Rates: Bikram Chatterji & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors. (28 February 2023)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Bela M. Trivedi, Civil Law, Interim Orders, Judges, Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 with Section 2, Recall of Orders, RERA

Supreme Court Rejects Recall of Order on Noida/Greater Noida Builders’ Interest Rates LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Supreme Court should recall its previous order that had recalled interim orders granting interest rate reductions to builders in Noida and Greater Noida. CASE TYPE: Real Estate/Civil Case Name: Bikram Chatterji & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors.

Supreme Court Rejects Recall of Order on Noida/Greater Noida Builders’ Interest Rates: Bikram Chatterji & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors. (28 February 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court directs early disposal of seniority dispute: Arjun Murmu vs. State of Odisha (2022)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 136, Indira Banerjee, Interim Orders, Judges, Promotion, Seniority Dispute, Service Law

Supreme Court directs early disposal of seniority dispute: Arjun Murmu vs. State of Odisha (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Seniority dispute between Assistant Section Officers recruited under special and general quotas. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Arjun Murmu vs. The State of Odisha & Ors. Judgment Date: 23 September 2022 Date of the Judgment: 23 September

Supreme Court directs early disposal of seniority dispute: Arjun Murmu vs. State of Odisha (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Modifies Order on Release of Mutual Funds in IL&FS Securities Case (11 April 2022)

/ Bank Guarantee, Civil Appellate Jurisdiction, Civil Law, Corporate Guarantee, Interim Orders, J.K. Maheshwari, Judges, Modification of Orders, Securities and Exchange Board of India, Securities Law, Vineet Saran

Supreme Court Modifies Order on Release of Mutual Funds in IL&FS Securities Case (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Modification of conditions for release of mutual funds. CASE TYPE: Civil Appellate Jurisdiction. Case Name: Securities and Exchange Board of India vs. IL&FS Securities Services Ltd. and Ors. Judgment Date: 11 April 2022 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 11

Supreme Court Modifies Order on Release of Mutual Funds in IL&FS Securities Case (11 April 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court quashes High Court order mandating ID proofs for OLX ads: OLX India B.V. vs. State of Haryana (2022)

/ Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure, High Court Powers, Interim Orders, Judges, Natural Justice, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, S. Ravindra Bhat, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court quashes High Court order mandating ID proofs for OLX ads: OLX India B.V. vs. State of Haryana (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a High Court can issue interim directions to an online platform to collect ID proofs from advertisers without hearing the platform. CASE TYPE: Criminal Appeal Case Name: OLX India B.V. vs. State

Supreme Court quashes High Court order mandating ID proofs for OLX ads: OLX India B.V. vs. State of Haryana (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Refuses to Recall Order on Deposit in Arbitration Case: Dharmesh S. Jain vs. Urban Infrastructure Real Estate Fund (25 January 2022)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration Law, Delay in Arbitration Proceedings, Deposit of Awarded Amount, Interim Orders, Judges, M.R. Shah, Recall of Orders, Sanjiv Khanna, Supreme Court Judgments

Supreme Court Refuses to Recall Order on Deposit in Arbitration Case: Dharmesh S. Jain vs. Urban Infrastructure Real Estate Fund (25 January 2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Supreme Court should recall its previous order directing a party to deposit an amount as per a High Court order in an arbitration matter. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Case

Supreme Court Refuses to Recall Order on Deposit in Arbitration Case: Dharmesh S. Jain vs. Urban Infrastructure Real Estate Fund (25 January 2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top