Interim Orders

Supreme Court Directs Appointment of Sub-Inspectors in Bihar Recruitment Case: Chandra Gupta Kumar vs. State of Bihar (2017) INSC 737 (14 September 2017)

/ Appointment of Sub-Inspectors, Final Orders, Interim Orders, Judges, Kurian Joseph, R. Banumathi, Selection Process, Service Law, Supreme Court Orders

Date of the Judgment: 14 September 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 737 Judges: Justice Kurian Joseph and Justice R. Banumathi Can a prolonged recruitment process, marred by litigation, finally reach a conclusion? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case concerning the appointment of Sub-Inspectors in Bihar, where the selection process had been […]

Supreme Court Directs Appointment of Sub-Inspectors in Bihar Recruitment Case: Chandra Gupta Kumar vs. State of Bihar (2017) INSC 737 (14 September 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs DGT&CP Haryana to Finalize Plot Allotment List: Okhla Enclave Case (2013)

/ Court-Directed Settlement, Dipak Misra, Dispute Resolution, Interim Orders, Judges, K. S. Radhakrishnan, Land Law, Land Law with Haryana Development & Regulation of Urban Areas Act 1975, Plot Allotment

Date of the Judgment: July 17, 2013 Judges: K. S. Radhakrishnan J. and Dipak Misra J. Can a court facilitate a resolution when multiple parties are entangled in a complex land dispute? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case involving plot allotments in Haryana. The court directed the Director General of

Supreme Court Directs DGT&CP Haryana to Finalize Plot Allotment List: Okhla Enclave Case (2013) Read Post »

Supreme Court Restores Interim Order in Property Dispute Case: Gazal Taneja vs. MTNL (2013)

/ Appeals, Civil Procedure, H.L. Dattu, Interim Orders, Jagdish Singh Khehar, Judges

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was justified in vacating an interim order in a property dispute. CASE TYPE: Civil Property Dispute Case Name: Gazal Taneja & Ors. vs. Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. & Anr. Judgment Date: May 8, 2013 Date of the Judgment: May 8, 2013 Citation: (2013) INSC 343 Judges: Justice H.L. Dattu

Supreme Court Restores Interim Order in Property Dispute Case: Gazal Taneja vs. MTNL (2013) Read Post »

Supreme Court sets aside arbitrary rent increase in tenant eviction case: Sunil Kumar vs. Surendra Kumar Agrarwal (26 September 2008)

/ Interim Orders, Judges, Judicial Review, Landlord-Tenant Relationships, Lokeshwar Singh Panta, Property Law, R.V. Raveendran, Rent Control Regulations

Date of the Judgment: 26 September 2008 Citation: Where available, provide the case citation in the Indian Supreme Court (INSC) format. Judges: Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.V. Raveendran and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Lokeshwar Singh Panta Can a High Court arbitrarily increase rent in an interim order during a tenant eviction case? The Supreme Court addressed this

Supreme Court sets aside arbitrary rent increase in tenant eviction case: Sunil Kumar vs. Surendra Kumar Agrarwal (26 September 2008) Read Post »

Scroll to Top