Order 22, Civil Procedure Code, 1908

Supreme Court clarifies procedure for substituting legal representatives in ongoing cases: Swami Vedvyasanand Ji Maharaj vs. Shyam Lal Chauhan & Ors. (2024) INSC 352 (30 April 2024)

Supreme Court clarifies procedure for substituting legal representatives in ongoing cases Date of the Judgment: 30 April 2024 Citation: (2024) INSC 352 Judges: Justice A.S. Bopanna and Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia Can a High Court substitute a legal representative in an ongoing case without properly considering the objections to the Trial Court’s report? The Supreme Court […]

Supreme Court clarifies procedure for substituting legal representatives in ongoing cases: Swami Vedvyasanand Ji Maharaj vs. Shyam Lal Chauhan & Ors. (2024) INSC 352 (30 April 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Abatement of Appeal in Property Dispute: Goli Vijayalakshmi vs. Yendru Sathiraju (26 April 2019)

April 26, 2019 / A.M. Khanwilkar, Abatement of Appeal, Ajay Rastogi, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Civil Procedure Code, 1908 with Order 22 Rule 4(3), Civil Procedure Code, 1908 with Order 41 Rule 4, Joint Decree, Judges, Order 22, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Property Law

Supreme Court Abatement of Appeal in Property Dispute: Goli Vijayalakshmi vs. Yendru Sathiraju (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an appeal abates in its entirety if one of the appellants dies and their legal representatives are not brought on record, particularly in cases involving joint and indivisible decrees. CASE TYPE: Civil Property Dispute Case Name: Goli Vijayalakshmi

Supreme Court Abatement of Appeal in Property Dispute: Goli Vijayalakshmi vs. Yendru Sathiraju (26 April 2019) Read Post »