Interim Orders

Supreme Court Intervention in Tender Process: Rajasthan State Warehousing Corporation vs. Star Agriwarehousing and Collateral Management Limited & Ors. (2020)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Constitution of India, Constitution of India with Article 136, Contract Law, Hemant Gupta, Interim Orders, Judges, Public Interest, Public Law, Public Procurement, Rajasthan Transparency in Public Procurement Rules, 2013, Rajasthan Transparency in Public Procurement Rules, 2013 with Rule 70(8), State Revenue, Tender Process

Supreme Court Intervention in Tender Process: Rajasthan State Warehousing Corporation vs. Star Agriwarehousing and Collateral Management Limited & Ors. (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: The core legal issue revolves around the permissibility of interim orders that halt the execution of contracts following a completed tender process, especially when such orders impact public interest and state revenue. CASE […]

Supreme Court Intervention in Tender Process: Rajasthan State Warehousing Corporation vs. Star Agriwarehousing and Collateral Management Limited & Ors. (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Appointment of Junior Accounts Clerk: Rana Pratap Singh vs. Vittiye Evam Lekha Adhikari (2019)

/ Appointment, Ashok Bhushan, Interim Orders, Judges, Navin Sinha, Reinstatement, Service Law, Subordinate Offices Ministerial Staff (Direct Recruitment) Rules, 1985, Subordinate Offices Ministerial Staff (Direct Recruitment) Rules, 1985 with Rule 22

Supreme Court Upholds Appointment of Junior Accounts Clerk: Rana Pratap Singh vs. Vittiye Evam Lekha Adhikari (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an appointment made by a duly constituted selection committee after calling names from the Employment Exchange can be deemed invalid due to procedural irregularities, and what is the effect of dismissal of a writ petition

Supreme Court Upholds Appointment of Junior Accounts Clerk: Rana Pratap Singh vs. Vittiye Evam Lekha Adhikari (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns High Court order on impounding unstamped agreement: Terai Tea Company vs. Kumkum Mittal (2019)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Civil Procedure, Consent Decree, Impounding of Documents, Indian Stamp Act, 1899, Indian Stamp Act, 1899 with Section 35, Interim Orders, Judges, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Specific Performance, Stamp Duty

Supreme Court overturns High Court order on impounding unstamped agreement: Terai Tea Company vs. Kumkum Mittal (2019) Date of the Judgment: October 22, 2019 Citation: 2019 INSC 1170 Judges: Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, J. and Ajay Rastogi, J. Can a court order the impounding of a document for insufficient stamp duty even after a decree based

Supreme Court overturns High Court order on impounding unstamped agreement: Terai Tea Company vs. Kumkum Mittal (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Payment in Contempt Case: Kotak Mahindra Bank vs. Sanjiv Gupta (23 September 2019)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Contempt of Court, Deepak Gupta, Enforcement of Court Orders, Interim Orders, Judges, Non-Compliance of Court Orders, Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 with Section 13, Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002

Supreme Court Directs Payment in Contempt Case: Kotak Mahindra Bank vs. Sanjiv Gupta (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a party is in contempt of court for not complying with an earlier order to pay a specific amount. CASE TYPE: Contempt of Court Case Name: Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited vs. Mr. Sanjiv Gupta & Others Judgment Date:

Supreme Court Directs Payment in Contempt Case: Kotak Mahindra Bank vs. Sanjiv Gupta (23 September 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Villa Possession, Rejects Delay Condonation in Property Dispute: Sanjay Singh vs. Central Himalayan Land Development Co. Ltd. (21 February 2019)

/ Ashok Bhushan, Civil Law, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 148, Condonation of Delay, Interim Orders, Judges, Property Law, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Upholds Villa Possession, Rejects Delay Condonation in Property Dispute: Sanjay Singh vs. Central Himalayan Land Development Co. Ltd. (2019) Date of the Judgment: 21 February 2019 Citation: 2019 INSC 166 Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, J. and Ashok Bhushan, J. Can a High Court reverse an order that was based on the understanding between

Supreme Court Upholds Villa Possession, Rejects Delay Condonation in Property Dispute: Sanjay Singh vs. Central Himalayan Land Development Co. Ltd. (21 February 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Division Bench Authority: AIIMS vs. Sanjiv Chaturvedi (2019)

/ Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 with Section 24, Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 with Section 25, Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 with Section 5, Central Administrative Tribunal, Indira Banerjee, Interim Orders, Judges, R. Banumathi, Service Law

Supreme Court Upholds Division Bench Authority: AIIMS vs. Sanjiv Chaturvedi (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Chairman of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), sitting singly, can stay proceedings before a Division Bench of the same Tribunal. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: All India Institute of Medical Sciences vs. Sanjiv Chaturvedi & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 1

Supreme Court Upholds Division Bench Authority: AIIMS vs. Sanjiv Chaturvedi (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court modifies custody arrangement in child custody dispute: Rajiv Vijayasarathy Ratnam vs. Savitha Seetharam (2018)

/ Child Custody, Child Welfare, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Family Law, Interim Orders, Judges, Kurian Joseph, Sanjay Kishan Kaul

Supreme Court modifies custody arrangement in child custody dispute: Rajiv Vijayasarathy Ratnam vs. Savitha Seetharam (2018) Date of the Judgment: September 11, 2018 Citation: (2018) INSC 772 Judges: Kurian Joseph, J. and Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J. Can parents be restricted from interacting with their child’s school? The Supreme Court addressed this issue while hearing an

Supreme Court modifies custody arrangement in child custody dispute: Rajiv Vijayasarathy Ratnam vs. Savitha Seetharam (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of status quo orders in petroleum dealership guidelines: K.K. Gupta & Ors. vs. Himachal Pradesh Petroleum Dealers Association & Anr. (2018)

/ Civil Law, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Civil Procedure Code, 1908 with Order 39, Contempt Jurisdiction, Contempt of Court, Interim Orders, Judges, Kurian Joseph, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Navin Sinha, Scope of Contempt, Status Quo

Supreme Court Clarifies Status Quo Orders in Petroleum Dealership Guidelines: K.K. Gupta vs. Himachal Pradesh Petroleum Dealers Association (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of status quo orders in the context of policy guidelines. CASE TYPE: Civil Appeal, Contempt Jurisdiction Case Name: K.K. Gupta & Ors. vs. Himachal Pradesh Petroleum Dealers Association & Anr. [Judgment Date]: April

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of status quo orders in petroleum dealership guidelines: K.K. Gupta & Ors. vs. Himachal Pradesh Petroleum Dealers Association & Anr. (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Restores Salary for Long-Serving Teacher: Aparbal Yadav vs. State of U.P. (2018)

/ Appellate Jurisdiction, Interim Orders, Judges, Kurian Joseph, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Navin Sinha, Salary Disputes, Service Law

Supreme Court Restores Salary for Long-Serving Teacher: Aparbal Yadav vs. State of U.P. (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an interim order passed by a Single Judge of the High Court regarding salary payment should be modified by a Division Bench during the pendency of a writ petition. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Aparbal Yadav vs.

Supreme Court Restores Salary for Long-Serving Teacher: Aparbal Yadav vs. State of U.P. (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court directs expeditious disposal of appeal in trust property dispute: B. Muthukrishnan vs. S.T. Reddiar Educational & Charitable Trust (2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Appeals, Civil Procedure, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Interim Orders, Judges, Order XLI, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, R. K. Agrawal, Trust Disputes

Supreme Court directs expeditious disposal of appeal in trust property dispute: B. Muthukrishnan vs. S.T. Reddiar Educational & Charitable Trust (2018) Date of the Judgment: February 23, 2018 Citation: Not Available Judges: R. K. Agrawal, J. and Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. Can interim orders of a High Court be challenged in the Supreme Court? The

Supreme Court directs expeditious disposal of appeal in trust property dispute: B. Muthukrishnan vs. S.T. Reddiar Educational & Charitable Trust (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders Payment Despite Appeal Win: Rajeshwar Mahto vs. Birla Corporation Ltd. (2018) INSC 129

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 17-B, Interim Orders, Judges, R.K. Agrawal, Workman

Supreme Court Orders Payment Despite Appeal Win in Birla Corporation Case LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an employer is obligated to comply with an interim order for payment of wages under Section 17-B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, even if the employer wins the main appeal. CASE TYPE: Industrial Dispute, Contempt Case Name: Rajeshwar Mahto vs.

Supreme Court Orders Payment Despite Appeal Win: Rajeshwar Mahto vs. Birla Corporation Ltd. (2018) INSC 129 Read Post »

Supreme Court Restrains Appointment of Principal in College Dispute: Dr. Vandana Tyagi vs. Apeejay Saraswati P.G. College (9 February 2018)

/ Civil Law, Interim Orders, Judges, Kurian Joseph, Letters Patent Appeal, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Service Law

Supreme Court Restrains Appointment of Principal in College Dispute: Dr. Vandana Tyagi vs. Apeejay Saraswati P.G. College Date of the Judgment: 9 February 2018 Judges: Kurian Joseph, J. and Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, J. Can an interim order restrain a college principal from performing her duties? The Supreme Court addressed this question in a recent appeal,

Supreme Court Restrains Appointment of Principal in College Dispute: Dr. Vandana Tyagi vs. Apeejay Saraswati P.G. College (9 February 2018) Read Post »

Scroll to Top