Restitution

Supreme Court Addresses Compensation for Vacant Medical Seats Due to Interim Orders: Ramkrishna Medical College vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2024)

/ Civil Procedure Law, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Interim Orders, Judicial Review, Restitution

Supreme Court Addresses Compensation for Vacant Medical Seats Due to Interim Orders: Ramkrishna Medical College vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2024) Date of the Judgment: 7th November 2024 Citation: 2024 INSC 845 Judges: B.R. Gavai, J. and K.V. Viswanathan, J. Can interim court orders, intended to protect individual student interests, inadvertently harm educational institutions? The […]

Supreme Court Addresses Compensation for Vacant Medical Seats Due to Interim Orders: Ramkrishna Medical College vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies “Change in Law” compensation in electricity contracts: GMR Warora Energy vs. CERC (20 April 2023)

/ B.R. Gavai, Carrying Cost, Change in Law, Contract Law, Electricity Law, Interpretation of Contracts, Judges, Power Purchase Agreement, Restitution, Vikram Nath

Date of the Judgment: 20 April 2023 Citation: Not Available in the provided document. Judges: B.R. Gavai, J. and Vikram Nath, J. Can changes in government policies and regulations lead to compensation in electricity contracts? The Supreme Court of India addressed this crucial question in a batch of appeals concerning power purchase agreements (PPAs). The

Supreme Court clarifies “Change in Law” compensation in electricity contracts: GMR Warora Energy vs. CERC (20 April 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies ‘Change in Law’ compensation in power purchase agreements: GMR Warora Energy Limited vs. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (20 April 2023)

/ B.R. Gavai, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 12, Constitutional Law with Article 268, Contract Law, Judges, Power Purchase Agreements, Restitution, Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Clarifies ‘Change in Law’ Compensation in Power Purchase Agreements Date of the Judgment: 20 April 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 398 Judges: B.R. Gavai, J. and Vikram Nath, J. Can power generating companies claim compensation for increased costs due to changes in government policies or regulations? The Supreme Court of India addressed this crucial

Supreme Court clarifies ‘Change in Law’ compensation in power purchase agreements: GMR Warora Energy Limited vs. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (20 April 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Change in Law Relief under SHAKTI Policy for Power Generators: Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited vs. Adani Power Maharashtra Limited (20 April 2023)

/ B.R. Gavai, Change in Law, Contract Law, Electricity Act, 2003, Electricity Law, Interpretation of Contracts, Judges, Power Purchase Agreement, Restitution, Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Upholds Change in Law Relief under SHAKTI Policy for Power Generators LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the introduction of the SHAKTI Policy constitutes a ‘Change in Law’ event under Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs). CASE TYPE: Electricity Regulatory Law, Contract Law Case Name: Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited vs. Adani Power Maharashtra Limited and Another

Supreme Court Upholds Change in Law Relief under SHAKTI Policy for Power Generators: Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited vs. Adani Power Maharashtra Limited (20 April 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders Restitution in Unitech Land Sale Case: Bhupinder Singh vs. Unitech Limited (23 March 2023)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 144, D.Y. Chandrachud, Judges, M.R. Shah, Restitution

Supreme Court Orders Restitution in Unitech Land Sale Case: Bhupinder Singh vs. Unitech Limited (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Applicability of the principle of restitution in cases where a court order is found to be erroneous. CASE TYPE: Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Case Name: Bhupinder Singh vs. Unitech Limited Judgment Date: 23 March 2023 Date of the Judgment:

Supreme Court Orders Restitution in Unitech Land Sale Case: Bhupinder Singh vs. Unitech Limited (23 March 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the application of Section 144 of CPC in restitution cases: Murti Bhawani Mata Mandir vs. Rajesh (2019) INSC 37

/ Application for Restitution, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 144, Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, Hemant Gupta, Injunction, Judges, Restitution

Supreme Court clarifies the application of Section 144 of CPC in restitution cases: Murti Bhawani Mata Mandir vs. Rajesh (2019) INSC 37 Date of the Judgment: 21 January 2019 Citation: (2019) INSC 37 Judges: Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, J. and Hemant Gupta, J. Can a party seek restitution of property under Section 144 of the

Supreme Court clarifies the application of Section 144 of CPC in restitution cases: Murti Bhawani Mata Mandir vs. Rajesh (2019) INSC 37 Read Post »

Scroll to Top