Civil Suit

Supreme Court defers decision on Hyderabad Cricket Association Constitution: Hyderabad Cricket Association vs. Charminar Cricket Club (2025) INSC 23

/ Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI), Civil Appeal, Civil Procedure, Civil Suit, Cricket, Hyderabad Cricket Association, Sports Law

Supreme Court defers decision on Hyderabad Cricket Association Constitution: Hyderabad Cricket Association vs. Charminar Cricket Club (2025) INSC 23 LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the recommendations of a Single Member Committee regarding the constitution of the Hyderabad Cricket Association should be approved. CASE TYPE: Civil. Case Name: M/s The Hyderabad Cricket Association vs. M/s Charminar Cricket Club […]

Supreme Court defers decision on Hyderabad Cricket Association Constitution: Hyderabad Cricket Association vs. Charminar Cricket Club (2025) INSC 23 Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns conviction under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act: Rajaram vs. Maruthachalam (2023) INSC 26

/ Acquittal, B.R. Gavai, Civil Law, Civil Suit, Criminal Appeal, Criminal Law, Judges, M.M. Sundresh, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 with Section 118(a), Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 with Section 138, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 with Section 139, Promissory Note

Supreme Court overturns conviction under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act: Rajaram vs. Maruthachalam (2023) INSC 26 Date of the Judgment: 18 January 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 26 Judges: B.R. Gavai, J. and M.M. Sundresh, J. Can a conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act be sustained if the accused demonstrates a probable

Supreme Court overturns conviction under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act: Rajaram vs. Maruthachalam (2023) INSC 26 Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows Suit by Unregistered Firm: Shiv Developers vs. Aksharay Developers (2022)

/ Civil Law, Civil Suit, Dinesh Maheshwari, Indian Partnership Act, 1932, Indian Partnership Act, 1932 with Section 69(2), Judges, Property Law, Unregistered Partnership Firm, Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Allows Suit by Unregistered Firm: Shiv Developers vs. Aksharay Developers (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an unregistered partnership firm can maintain a suit against a third party for a transaction not related to its regular business. CASE TYPE: Civil Law – Partnership Case Name: Shiv Developers Through Its Partner Sunilbhai Somabhai Ajmeri vs. Aksharay

Supreme Court Allows Suit by Unregistered Firm: Shiv Developers vs. Aksharay Developers (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Cancellation of Sale Deed: Amudhavali vs. P. Rukumani (2021)

/ Cancellation Deeds, Civil Law, Civil Suit, Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, Property Law, R. Subhash Reddy, Registration Act, 1908, Registration Act, 1908 with provisions concerning registration of documents, Registration of Deeds

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Cancellation of Sale Deed: Amudhavali vs. P. Rukumani (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a registered sale deed can be unilaterally cancelled by the seller. CASE TYPE: Civil Law – Property Dispute Case Name: Amudhavali & Ors. vs. P. Rukumani & Ors. Judgment Date: 7 December 2021 Introduction Date of

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Cancellation of Sale Deed: Amudhavali vs. P. Rukumani (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Dismisses Writ Petition in Banking Dispute: Punjab National Bank vs. Atmanand Singh (6 May 2020)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, Civil Procedure, Civil Suit, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Dinesh Maheshwari, Fundamental Rights, Judges, Writ Jurisdiction

Supreme Court Dismisses Writ Petition in Punjab National Bank vs. Atmanand Singh Date of the Judgment: 6 May 2020 Citation: Civil Appeal No. …/2020 (Arising out of SLP(C) No. 11603/2017) Judges: A.M. Khanwilkar, J., Dinesh Maheshwari, J. Can a High Court use its writ jurisdiction to settle a complex financial dispute involving disputed facts? The

Supreme Court Dismisses Writ Petition in Banking Dispute: Punjab National Bank vs. Atmanand Singh (6 May 2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Overturns Possession Decree After Land Acquisition: Market Committee Hodal vs. Sukhdevi (2015)

/ Adarsh Kumar Goel, Anil R. Dave, Civil Law, Civil Suit, Decree of Possession, Judges, Land Acquisition, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6

Date of the Judgment: 15th October, 2015 Citation: Not Available Judges: Anil R. Dave, J. and Adarsh Kumar Goel, J. Can a civil court decree possession of land when that land has already been acquired by the government? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in a case where a lower court had

Supreme Court Overturns Possession Decree After Land Acquisition: Market Committee Hodal vs. Sukhdevi (2015) Read Post »

Scroll to Top