Civil Procedure

Supreme Court Remands Land Acquisition Case: State of Punjab vs. Mangtu (2018)

/ Appellate Jurisdiction, Civil Procedure, Judges, Kurian Joseph, Land Acquisition Law, Land Value Fixation, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Remand of Cases

Supreme Court Remands Land Acquisition Case: State of Punjab vs. Mangtu (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Land value fixation in acquisition cases. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: The State of Punjab & Ors. vs. Mangtu(Deceased) Through Lrs. And Ors. [Judgment Date]: March 23, 2018 Date of the Judgment: March 23, 2018 Citation: 2018 INSC 236 Judges: […]

Supreme Court Remands Land Acquisition Case: State of Punjab vs. Mangtu (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Settles Matrimonial Dispute and Loan Settlement: Ramakanth V. Purnima (2018) INSC 171

/ Banking Law, Civil Procedure, Financial Settlement, Judges, Kurian Joseph, Loan Settlement, Matrimonial Law, Mediation, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Settlement, Settlement of Disputes

Supreme Court Settles Matrimonial Dispute: Ramakanth V. Purnima (2018) INSC 171 Date of the Judgment: March 19, 2018 Citation: (2018) INSC 171 Judges: Kurian Joseph, J., Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, J. Can a long-standing matrimonial dispute be resolved through mediation, and can a bank’s loan settlement be included in the final resolution? The Supreme Court of

Supreme Court Settles Matrimonial Dispute and Loan Settlement: Ramakanth V. Purnima (2018) INSC 171 Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows Review Petition After Delay: Pralhad Shankarrao Tajale vs. State of Maharashtra (2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Civil Procedure, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Condonation of Delay, Judges, Order XLVII, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Procedural Law, Review Petition, S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court Allows Review Petition After Delay: Pralhad Shankarrao Tajale vs. State of Maharashtra (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a delay in curing defects in a review application should lead to its dismissal. CASE TYPE: Civil Case Name: Pralhad Shankarrao Tajale & Ors. vs. State of Maharashtra through its Secretary (Revenue) & Anr. [Judgment Date]: March

Supreme Court Allows Review Petition After Delay: Pralhad Shankarrao Tajale vs. State of Maharashtra (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court directs expeditious disposal of appeal in trust property dispute: B. Muthukrishnan vs. S.T. Reddiar Educational & Charitable Trust (2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Appeals, Civil Procedure, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Interim Orders, Judges, Order XLI, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, R. K. Agrawal, Trust Disputes

Supreme Court directs expeditious disposal of appeal in trust property dispute: B. Muthukrishnan vs. S.T. Reddiar Educational & Charitable Trust (2018) Date of the Judgment: February 23, 2018 Citation: Not Available Judges: R. K. Agrawal, J. and Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. Can interim orders of a High Court be challenged in the Supreme Court? The

Supreme Court directs expeditious disposal of appeal in trust property dispute: B. Muthukrishnan vs. S.T. Reddiar Educational & Charitable Trust (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order for Not Providing Opportunity to Rebut Additional Evidence in Partition Suit: Akhilesh Singh vs. Lal Babu Singh (2018)

/ A.K. Sikri, Additional Evidence, Appellate Procedure, Ashok Bhushan, Civil Procedure, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Judges, Natural Justice, Order XLI Rule 2, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Order XLI Rule 27, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order for Not Providing Opportunity to Rebut Additional Evidence in Partition Suit: Akhilesh Singh vs. Lal Babu Singh (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an appellate court must provide an opportunity to the contesting party to rebut or explain additional evidence admitted under Order XLI Rule 27 of the Code of

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order for Not Providing Opportunity to Rebut Additional Evidence in Partition Suit: Akhilesh Singh vs. Lal Babu Singh (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Closes Contempt Petition in Cauvery Water Dispute: State of Tamil Nadu vs. Siddaramaiah (2018)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, Amitava Roy, Civil Appeal, Civil Procedure, Contempt Law, Contempt Petition, Dipak Misra, Disposal of Contempt Petition, Judges

Supreme Court Closes Contempt Petition in Cauvery Water Dispute: State of Tamil Nadu vs. Siddaramaiah (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a contempt petition should continue after the disposal of the main civil appeal. CASE TYPE: Contempt Petition (Civil) Case Name: State of Tamil Nadu represented by the Secretary to Government Public Works Department vs. Siddaramaiah, Chief

Supreme Court Closes Contempt Petition in Cauvery Water Dispute: State of Tamil Nadu vs. Siddaramaiah (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns High Court order on e-tender bid retrieval: Maharashtra Housing Development Authority vs. Shapoorji Pallonji & Company (2018) INSC 107 (12 February 2018)

/ Civil Procedure, Contract Law, E-Governance, Information Technology, Judges, National Informatics Centre, R. Banumathi, Ranjan Gogoi, Validity of Bids, Writ Jurisdiction

Maharashtra Housing Development Authority vs. Shapoorji Pallonji & Company: Supreme Court on E-Tendering Can a bid submitted through an e-tendering portal be considered valid if the bidder failed to complete the process by pressing the “freeze” button? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question in a case concerning a major housing development project

Supreme Court overturns High Court order on e-tender bid retrieval: Maharashtra Housing Development Authority vs. Shapoorji Pallonji & Company (2018) INSC 107 (12 February 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court remands land acquisition case to High Court: Lohit & Anr. vs. State of Haryana (2018)

/ Appeals, Civil Procedure, Civil Procedure with Remand, Judges, Kurian Joseph, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

Supreme Court remands land acquisition case to High Court: Lohit & Anr. vs. State of Haryana (2018) Date of the Judgment: February 9, 2018 Citation: [Not Available in the source] Judges: Kurian Joseph, J., Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, J. Can a case be sent back to the High Court for reconsideration if a similar case has

Supreme Court remands land acquisition case to High Court: Lohit & Anr. vs. State of Haryana (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Remands Consumer Case Due to Lack of Notice: Mangalam Homes & Resorts Pvt. Ltd. vs. Joy Kaliyavumkal (2018)

/ Civil Procedure, Consumer Dispute Redressal, Consumer Protection Act, Deepak Gupta, Judges, Madan B. Lokur, National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Notice Requirements, Procedural Fairness, Right to be Heard

Supreme Court Remands Consumer Case Due to Lack of Notice: Mangalam Homes & Resorts Pvt. Ltd. vs. Joy Kaliyavumkal (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) can proceed ex-parte without ensuring proper notice to the parties. CASE TYPE: Consumer Dispute Case Name: M/s Mangalam Homes & Resorts Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

Supreme Court Remands Consumer Case Due to Lack of Notice: Mangalam Homes & Resorts Pvt. Ltd. vs. Joy Kaliyavumkal (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Compensation Release in Motor Accident Case: United India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Sunil Kumar (2017)

/ Civil Procedure, Compensation Release, Court Orders, Judges, Motor Accident Law, R. Banumathi, Ranjan Gogoi

LEGAL ISSUE: Clarification on the location of deposited compensation for release to the claimant. CASE TYPE: Motor Accident Compensation Case Name: United India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Sunil Kumar & Anr. [Judgment Date]: December 1, 2017 Introduction Date of the Judgment: December 1, 2017 Citation: Not Available Judges: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Hon’ble

Supreme Court Clarifies Compensation Release in Motor Accident Case: United India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Sunil Kumar (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Disposes of Property Dispute Following Out-of-Court Settlement: V.M. Manomani & Ors. vs. Shanthi (2017)

/ Amitava Roy, Civil Procedure, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Judges, Kurian Joseph, Order XXIII, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Out of Court Settlement

Can a civil appeal be disposed of if the parties have settled their dispute outside of court? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in the case of V.M. Manomani & Ors. vs. Shanthi. This case involved a property dispute. The court disposed of the appeal after the parties informed the court of their

Supreme Court Disposes of Property Dispute Following Out-of-Court Settlement: V.M. Manomani & Ors. vs. Shanthi (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court directs Tribunal to Expedite Constable Appointment Case: Shaik Shahanaj vs. State of Andhra Pradesh (24 November 2017)

/ Amitava Roy, Civil Procedure, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Constitutional Law with Article 16, Judges, Kurian Joseph, Non-Creamy Layer Certificate, Recruitment Rules, Service Law, State Administrative Tribunal, Timely Disposal of Cases

Can a delay in producing a non-creamy layer certificate cost someone a job? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this issue in a case concerning the selection of a police constable. The court directed the State Administrative Tribunal to expedite the matter. This case highlights the importance of timely submission of documents in government

Supreme Court directs Tribunal to Expedite Constable Appointment Case: Shaik Shahanaj vs. State of Andhra Pradesh (24 November 2017) Read Post »

Scroll to Top