Security Deposit

Supreme Court Upholds Mandatory Security Deposit for Setting Aside Ex-Parte Decrees in Small Causes Court Cases: Arti Dixit & Anr vs. Sushil Kumar Mishra & Ors (2023) INSC 478 (18 May 2023)

/ Civil Procedure, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order IX Rule 13, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 145, Ex-parte Decree, Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887, Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 with Section 17, Security Deposit, Setting Aside Decree

Supreme Court Upholds Mandatory Security Deposit for Setting Aside Ex-Parte Decrees in Small Causes Court Cases Date of the Judgment: 18 May 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 478 Judges: K.M. Joseph, J., Hrishikesh Roy, J. Can an application to set aside an ex-parte decree be entertained if the applicant fails to deposit the decretal amount or […]

Supreme Court Upholds Mandatory Security Deposit for Setting Aside Ex-Parte Decrees in Small Causes Court Cases: Arti Dixit & Anr vs. Sushil Kumar Mishra & Ors (2023) INSC 478 (18 May 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds No-Interest Rule on Security Deposits for Money Lenders and Pawn Brokers: State of Karnataka vs. Karnataka Pawn Brokers Assn. (2018) INSC 190 (15 March 2018)

/ Business Regulation, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Deepak Gupta, Doctrine of Separation of Powers, Judges, Karnataka Money Lenders Act, 1961, Karnataka Money Lenders Act, 1961 with Section 7-A, Karnataka Pawn Brokers Act, 1961, Karnataka Pawn Brokers Act, 1961 with Section 4-A, Madan B. Lokur, Security Deposit

Supreme Court Upholds No-Interest Rule on Security Deposits for Money Lenders and Pawn Brokers Date of the Judgment: 15 March 2018 Citation: (2018) INSC 190 Judges: Madan B. Lokur J., Deepak Gupta J. Can the government mandate that security deposits from money lenders and pawn brokers not earn interest? The Supreme Court of India addressed

Supreme Court Upholds No-Interest Rule on Security Deposits for Money Lenders and Pawn Brokers: State of Karnataka vs. Karnataka Pawn Brokers Assn. (2018) INSC 190 (15 March 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court rules against forfeiture of security deposit in auction case: Suresh Kumar Wadhwa vs. State of M.P. (25 October 2017)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Auction Law, Breach of contract, Forfeiture Clause, Indian Contract Act, 1872, Indian Contract Act, 1872 with Section 74, Judges, Public Auction, R.K. Agrawal, Security Deposit, Terms and Conditions

Date of the Judgment: 25 October 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 923 Judges: R.K. Agrawal, J. and Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. Can a government body forfeit a security deposit when the terms of the auction were not fully disclosed? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case involving a public auction of land.

Supreme Court rules against forfeiture of security deposit in auction case: Suresh Kumar Wadhwa vs. State of M.P. (25 October 2017) Read Post »

Scroll to Top