Amendment of Pleadings

Supreme Court Remands Easement Case: Jayanandan vs. Suresh Kumar (2024) INSC 956

/ Amendment of Pleadings, Appellate Procedure, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order VI Rule 17

Supreme Court Remands Easement Case: Jayanandan vs. Suresh Kumar (2024) INSC 956 Date of the Judgment: December 2, 2024 Citation: 2024 INSC 956 Judges: B.V. Nagarathna, J., Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh, J. Can a court set aside a trial court’s decree based solely on an amended written statement without further evidence? The Supreme Court of India […]

Supreme Court Remands Easement Case: Jayanandan vs. Suresh Kumar (2024) INSC 956 Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows Amendment of Pleadings to Challenge Will in Property Dispute: Dinesh Goyal vs. Suman Agarwal (24 September 2024)

/ Amendment of Pleadings, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order VI Rule 17, Property Dispute, Succession Law, Will Validity

Supreme Court Allows Amendment of Pleadings to Challenge Will in Property Dispute: Dinesh Goyal vs. Suman Agarwal (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a court can allow the amendment of pleadings to challenge the genuineness of a will after the trial has commenced in a property dispute case. CASE TYPE: Civil, Property Dispute, Succession Case Name: Dinesh

Supreme Court Allows Amendment of Pleadings to Challenge Will in Property Dispute: Dinesh Goyal vs. Suman Agarwal (24 September 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court restricts amendment of pleadings at fag end of trial: Basavaraj vs. Indira (2024) INSC 151

/ Amendment of Pleadings, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order VI Rule 17, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XXIII Rule 3, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 59

Supreme Court on Amendment of Pleadings: Basavaraj vs. Indira (2024) INSC 151 Date of the Judgment: February 29, 2024 Citation: 2024 INSC 151 Judges: C.T. Ravikumar, J., Rajesh Bindal, J. Can a party amend their pleadings at the fag end of a trial to introduce a new claim, especially when a previous compromise decree exists?

Supreme Court restricts amendment of pleadings at fag end of trial: Basavaraj vs. Indira (2024) INSC 151 Read Post »

Supreme Court allows amendment of pleadings in mortgage redemption suit: Ganesh Prasad vs. Rajeshwar Prasad (2023)

/ Amendment of Pleadings, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order IX Rule 9, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order VI Rule 17, J. B. Pardiwala, Judges, Redemption of Mortgage, Sudhanshu Dhulia, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Transfer of Property Act, 1882 with Section 83

Supreme Court Allows Amendment of Pleadings in Mortgage Redemption Suit: Ganesh Prasad vs. Rajeshwar Prasad (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a plaintiff can amend their plaint to include alternative and potentially inconsistent pleas, particularly in a suit involving mortgage redemption and tenancy disputes. CASE TYPE: Civil (Mortgage Redemption, Tenancy Dispute) Case Name: Ganesh Prasad vs. Rajeshwar

Supreme Court allows amendment of pleadings in mortgage redemption suit: Ganesh Prasad vs. Rajeshwar Prasad (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Rejects Belated Amendment to Plaint in Property Partition Suit: Vijay Hathising Shah vs. Gitaben Parshottamdas Mukhi (2019)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Amendment of Pleadings, Civil Procedure Code, Civil Procedure Code with Order VI, Rule 17, Dinesh Maheshwari, Judges, Partition Suits, Property Law

Supreme Court Rejects Belated Amendment to Plaint in Property Partition Suit: Vijay Hathising Shah vs. Gitaben Parshottamdas Mukhi (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a trial court is justified in rejecting a belated application for amendment of a plaint when the trial is nearing completion. CASE TYPE: Civil (Property Partition) Case Name: Vijay Hathising Shah & Anr.

Supreme Court Rejects Belated Amendment to Plaint in Property Partition Suit: Vijay Hathising Shah vs. Gitaben Parshottamdas Mukhi (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Belated Amendment in Partition Suit: M. Revanna vs. Anjanamma (2019)

/ Amendment of Pleadings, Civil Law, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order VI Rule 17, Judges, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, N.V. Ramana, Partition Suit

Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Belated Amendment in Partition Suit: M. Revanna vs. Anjanamma (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a court can allow an amendment to a plaint after the trial has commenced, particularly when the amendment introduces a new and inconsistent case that was known to the party earlier. CASE TYPE: Civil (Partition Suit) Case

Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Belated Amendment in Partition Suit: M. Revanna vs. Anjanamma (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows Amendment of Plaint After Trial Commenced: Gurbakhsh Singh vs. Buta Singh (27 April 2018)

/ Amendment of Pleadings, Arun Mishra, Civil Litigation, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order 6 Rule 17, Judges, Litigation, Trial Procedure, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Allows Amendment of Plaint After Trial Commenced: Gurbakhsh Singh vs. Buta Singh (2018) Date of the Judgment: 27 April 2018 Citation: (2018) INSC 357 Judges: Arun Mishra, J. and Uday Umesh Lalit, J. Can a party amend their pleadings after the trial has commenced? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in

Supreme Court Allows Amendment of Plaint After Trial Commenced: Gurbakhsh Singh vs. Buta Singh (27 April 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court allows amendment of pleadings and filing of documents in civil suit: N.C. Bansal vs. Uttar Pradesh Financial Corporation (2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Amendment of Pleadings, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order 6 Rule 17, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order 7 Rule 14, Judges, R.K. Agrawal

Supreme Court Allows Amendment of Pleadings and Filing of Documents in Civil Suit: N.C. Bansal vs. Uttar Pradesh Financial Corporation (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a plaintiff should be allowed to amend their pleadings and file additional documents at an initial stage of a civil suit. CASE TYPE: Civil Case Name: N.C. Bansal vs. Uttar Pradesh

Supreme Court allows amendment of pleadings and filing of documents in civil suit: N.C. Bansal vs. Uttar Pradesh Financial Corporation (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows Amendment of Written Statement in Property Dispute: Raj Kumar Bhatia vs. Subhash Chander Bhatia (2017) INSC 754

/ A. M. Khanwilkar, Amendment of Pleadings, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 227, D. Y. Chandrachud, Dipak Misra, Judges, Order 6 Rule 17, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908

Date of the Judgment: December 15, 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 754 Judges: Dipak Misra, CJI, A. M. Khanwilkar, J, Dr D Y Chandrachud, J Can a party amend their written statement to include a new defense, even if it is years after the initial filing? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a

Supreme Court Allows Amendment of Written Statement in Property Dispute: Raj Kumar Bhatia vs. Subhash Chander Bhatia (2017) INSC 754 Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies rules for amending written statements in property disputes: Gautam Sarup vs. Leela Jetly (2008)

/ Amendment of Pleadings, Code of Civil Procedure, Code of Civil Procedure with Order VI Rule 17, Code of Civil Procedure with Order VIII Rule 5, Indian Evidence Act, Indian Evidence Act with Section 58, Judges, S.B. Sinha, V.S. Sirpurkar

Date of the Judgment: March 7, 2008 Judges: S.B. Sinha, J., V.S. Sirpurkar, J. Can a party be allowed to amend their written statement to retract admissions made earlier? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case involving a property dispute arising from a will. The court examined the circumstances under which

Supreme Court clarifies rules for amending written statements in property disputes: Gautam Sarup vs. Leela Jetly (2008) Read Post »

Scroll to Top