First Appellate Court

Supreme Court Remands Property Dispute Case: Sabir Hussain vs. Syed Mohammad Hassan (2023)

/ Adverse Possession, Appellate Procedure, Evidentiary Value of Documents, First Appellate Court, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Re-appreciation of Evidence, Sale Deed, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Witness Testimony

Supreme Court Remands Property Dispute Case: Sabir Hussain vs. Syed Mohammad Hassan (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court erred in reversing the Trial Court’s judgment without proper consideration of evidence in a property dispute case. CASE TYPE: Civil Property Dispute Case Name: Sabir Hussain (Dead) Thr. Lrs. And Ors. vs. Syed Mohammad Hassan (Dead) […]

Supreme Court Remands Property Dispute Case: Sabir Hussain vs. Syed Mohammad Hassan (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Partition Decree, Emphasizes Convenience in Land Allotment: Mallanagouda vs. Ninganagouda (2021) INSC 157 (12 March 2021)

/ Appellate Jurisdiction, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order 20 Rule 18, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order 41 Rule 27, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 100, First Appellate Court, High Court, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Land Allotment, Partition of Property, Property Law, S. Ravindra Bhat, Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Partition Decree, Emphasizes Convenience in Land Allotment Date of the Judgment: 12 March 2021 Citation: (2021) INSC 157 Judges: L. Nageswara Rao, J. and S. Ravindra Bhat, J. Can a High Court interfere with a First Appellate Court’s factual findings in a property partition case? The Supreme Court addressed this question in

Supreme Court Upholds Partition Decree, Emphasizes Convenience in Land Allotment: Mallanagouda vs. Ninganagouda (2021) INSC 157 (12 March 2021) Read Post »

Scroll to Top