Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order 41 Rule 27

Supreme Court Remands Forest Land Dispute: State of Karnataka vs. M.A. Mohamad Sanaulla (20 September 2022)

Supreme Court Remands Forest Land Dispute: State of Karnataka vs. M.A. Mohamad Sanaulla (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the State was given adequate opportunity to present its case regarding a disputed land claimed as forest land. CASE TYPE: Civil dispute concerning land ownership and forest laws. Case Name: The State of Karnataka & Anr. vs. M.A. […]

Supreme Court Remands Forest Land Dispute: State of Karnataka vs. M.A. Mohamad Sanaulla (20 September 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows Additional Evidence in Land Acquisition Case: Sanjay Kumar Singh vs. State of Jharkhand (2022)

Supreme Court Allows Additional Evidence in Land Acquisition Case: Sanjay Kumar Singh vs. State of Jharkhand (2022) Date of the Judgment: March 10, 2022 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and B.V. Nagarathna, J. Can an appellate court allow additional evidence in a land acquisition case to ensure fair compensation? The Supreme Court addressed this question in

Supreme Court Allows Additional Evidence in Land Acquisition Case: Sanjay Kumar Singh vs. State of Jharkhand (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Bank Guarantee Encashment: Atlanta Infrastructure Ltd. vs. Delta Marine Company & Ors. (2021)

Supreme Court Upholds Bank Guarantee Encashment: Atlanta Infrastructure Ltd. vs. Delta Marine Company & Ors. (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Scope of interference in encashment of bank guarantees. CASE TYPE: Civil Appeal. Case Name: Atlanta Infrastructure Ltd. (Rechristened as Atlanta Ltd.) vs. Delta Marine Company & Ors. Judgment Date: 19 July 2021 Date of the Judgment: 19

Supreme Court Upholds Bank Guarantee Encashment: Atlanta Infrastructure Ltd. vs. Delta Marine Company & Ors. (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Partition Decree, Emphasizes Convenience in Land Allotment: Mallanagouda vs. Ninganagouda (2021) INSC 157 (12 March 2021)

Supreme Court Upholds Partition Decree, Emphasizes Convenience in Land Allotment Date of the Judgment: 12 March 2021 Citation: (2021) INSC 157 Judges: L. Nageswara Rao, J. and S. Ravindra Bhat, J. Can a High Court interfere with a First Appellate Court’s factual findings in a property partition case? The Supreme Court addressed this question in

Supreme Court Upholds Partition Decree, Emphasizes Convenience in Land Allotment: Mallanagouda vs. Ninganagouda (2021) INSC 157 (12 March 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court sets aside High Court judgment for failing to consider application for additional evidence: Jatinder Singh vs. Mehar Singh (2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 19, 2008 Judges: Tarun Chatterjee, J., Aftab Alam, J. When a party presents additional evidence in a second appeal, is it the duty of the High Court to consider such evidence? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case where the High Court of Punjab and

Supreme Court sets aside High Court judgment for failing to consider application for additional evidence: Jatinder Singh vs. Mehar Singh (2008) Read Post »

Scroll to Top