Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order 41 Rule 5

Supreme Court Upholds Interim Order for Deposit of Awarded Amount in Arbitration Case: Sepco vs. Power Mech (19 September 2022)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 36, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 9, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order 41 Rule 5, Indira Banerjee, Judges, Krishna Murari

Supreme Court Upholds Interim Order for Deposit of Awarded Amount in Arbitration Case: Sepco vs. Power Mech LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a court can order a party to deposit the full arbitral award amount as a condition for staying the award’s enforcement. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: Sepco Electric Power Construction Corporation vs. Power Mech […]

Supreme Court Upholds Interim Order for Deposit of Awarded Amount in Arbitration Case: Sepco vs. Power Mech (19 September 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Execution of Specific Performance Decrees After Appeal: Surinder Pal Soni vs. Sohan Lal (2019)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order 41 Rule 5, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Execution of Decree, Indira Banerjee, Judges, Specific Performance, Specific Relief Act, 1963, Specific Relief Act, 1963 with Section 28

Supreme Court Clarifies Execution of Specific Performance Decrees After Appeal: Surinder Pal Soni vs. Sohan Lal (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a decree for specific performance from a trial court merges with the decree of the appellate court, and if so, what impact it has on the execution of the decree, particularly concerning time limits for

Supreme Court Clarifies Execution of Specific Performance Decrees After Appeal: Surinder Pal Soni vs. Sohan Lal (2019) Read Post »

Scroll to Top