Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order I Rule 3

Territorial Jurisdiction in Shipping Disputes: Supreme Court Affirms Delhi Court’s Authority in Arcadia Shipping Ltd. vs. Tata Steel Ltd. (2024)

/ Bill of Lading, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order I Rule 3, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order I Rule 7, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 20, Shipping Law, Territorial Jurisdiction

Supreme Court Upholds Delhi Court’s Jurisdiction in Shipping Dispute: Arcadia Shipping Ltd. vs. Tata Steel Ltd. (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Determining territorial jurisdiction in cases involving interconnected transactions of sale and shipment of goods. CASE TYPE: Civil. Case Name: Arcadia Shipping Ltd. vs. Tata Steel Limited and Others. [Judgment Date]: April 16, 2024 Introduction Date of […]

Territorial Jurisdiction in Shipping Disputes: Supreme Court Affirms Delhi Court’s Authority in Arcadia Shipping Ltd. vs. Tata Steel Ltd. (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies partition of self-acquired property in family disputes: B.R. Patil vs. Tulsa Y. Sawkar (2022)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order I Rule 3, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order II Rule 3, Hindu Succession Act, 1956, Hindu Succession Act, 1956 with Section 8, Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Non-Joinder of Parties, Partition of Property, Self-Acquired Property

Supreme Court clarifies partition of self-acquired property in family disputes: B.R. Patil vs. Tulsa Y. Sawkar (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether self-acquired properties of a deceased person can be partitioned among legal heirs and whether a suit for partition can be dismissed for non-joinder of other family members and properties. CASE TYPE: Civil (Partition) Case Name:

Supreme Court clarifies partition of self-acquired property in family disputes: B.R. Patil vs. Tulsa Y. Sawkar (2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top