Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order VIII Rule 5

Supreme Court Upholds Citizen’s Property Rights Against State’s Adverse Possession Claim: State of Haryana vs. Amin Lal (2024) INSC 875 (19 November 2024)

/ Adverse Possession, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order VIII Rule 5, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 110, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 35, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 65, Property Law, State and Property Rights

Supreme Court Upholds Citizen’s Property Rights Against State’s Adverse Possession Claim Date of the Judgment: 19 November 2024 Citation: 2024 INSC 875 Judges: Vikram Nath, J., Prasanna B. Varale, J. Can a state claim ownership of a citizen’s property through adverse possession? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this critical question in a case […]

Supreme Court Upholds Citizen’s Property Rights Against State’s Adverse Possession Claim: State of Haryana vs. Amin Lal (2024) INSC 875 (19 November 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Will Despite Challenges: Thangam vs. Navamani Ammal (2024)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order VIII Rule 3, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order VIII Rule 5, Suspicious Circumstances, Testamentary Succession, Validity of Will

Supreme Court Upholds Will Despite Challenges: Thangam vs. Navamani Ammal (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Validity of a Will challenged on grounds of suspicious circumstances. CASE TYPE: Civil – Testamentary Succession Case Name: Thangam and Another vs. Navamani Ammal Judgment Date: March 04, 2024 Date of the Judgment: March 04, 2024 Citation: 2024 INSC 164 Judges: C.T.

Supreme Court Upholds Will Despite Challenges: Thangam vs. Navamani Ammal (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Sets Aside Judgment on Admission in Property Partition Suit: Vikrant Kapila vs. Pankaja Panda (2023)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order VIII Rule 5, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XII Rule 6, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XV Rule 2, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 17, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 68, Indian Succession Act, 1925, Indian Succession Act, 1925 with Section 63, Indian Succession Act, 1925 with Section 83

Supreme Court Sets Aside Judgment on Admission in Property Partition Suit: Vikrant Kapila vs. Pankaja Panda (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a judgment on admission can be passed in a property partition suit when the existence of a will is disputed. CASE TYPE: Civil – Property Partition Case Name: Vikrant Kapila and Another vs. Pankaja Panda

Supreme Court Sets Aside Judgment on Admission in Property Partition Suit: Vikrant Kapila vs. Pankaja Panda (2023) Read Post »

Scroll to Top