Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 11

Supreme Court clarifies the application of Res Judicata between Co-defendants in Property Dispute: Har Narayan Tewari vs. Cantonment Board (2024)

/ Adverse Possession, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 11, Land Ownership, Property Law, Res Judicata

Supreme Court Clarifies Res Judicata in Property Dispute: Har Narayan Tewari vs. Cantonment Board (2024) Date of the Judgment: July 08, 2024 Citation: 2024 INSC 467 Judges: Justice Abhay S. Oka and Justice Pankaj Mithal Can a previous suit between a plaintiff and multiple defendants bar a subsequent suit between the co-defendants? The Supreme Court […]

Supreme Court clarifies the application of Res Judicata between Co-defendants in Property Dispute: Har Narayan Tewari vs. Cantonment Board (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies contempt of court in property dispute: Shah Enterprises vs. Vaijayantibhen (2024)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order VII Rule 11(d), Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XIV Rule 2, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 11, Consent Decree, Contempt Jurisdiction, Contempt of Court, Land Disputes, Property Law

Supreme Court clarifies contempt of court in property dispute: Shah Enterprises vs. Vaijayantibhen (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether filing a civil suit that potentially contradicts a previous consent decree amounts to contempt of court. CASE TYPE: Contempt of Court, Property Law Case Name: M/S Shah Enterprises Thr. Padmaben Mansukhbhai Modi vs. Vaijayantiben Ranjitsingh Sawant & Ors.

Supreme Court clarifies contempt of court in property dispute: Shah Enterprises vs. Vaijayantibhen (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Judicial Discipline in Property Dispute: Mary Pushpam vs. Telvi Curusumary (2024)

/ Civil Law, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 11, Doctrine of Merger, Judicial Discipline, Property Law

Supreme Court Upholds Judicial Discipline in Property Dispute: Mary Pushpam vs. Telvi Curusumary (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a lower court can interpret a High Court judgment differently in a subsequent proceeding when the High Court has already determined the scope of the property in dispute. CASE TYPE: Civil Property Dispute Case Name: Mary Pushpam vs.

Supreme Court Upholds Judicial Discipline in Property Dispute: Mary Pushpam vs. Telvi Curusumary (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Prior Partition in Family Property Dispute: K. Arumuga Velaiah vs. P.R. Ramasamy (27 January 2022)

/ B.R. Gavai, B.V. Nagarathna, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 11, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Registration Act, 1908, Registration Act, 1908 with Section 17(1)(e), Registration Act, 1908 with Section 17(2)(v), Registration Act, 1908 with Section 49, Res Judicata

Supreme Court Upholds Prior Partition in Family Property Dispute: K. Arumuga Velaiah vs. P.R. Ramasamy (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a prior family partition, even if based on an unregistered arbitration award, bars a subsequent suit for partition of the same properties. CASE TYPE: Civil Property Dispute Case Name: K. Arumuga Velaiah vs. P.R. Ramasamy and

Supreme Court Upholds Prior Partition in Family Property Dispute: K. Arumuga Velaiah vs. P.R. Ramasamy (27 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Res Judicata in Property Dispute: Jamia Masjid vs. K V Rudrappa (23 September 2021)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order 23, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 11, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Hima Kohli, Judges, Res Judicata, Vikram Nath, Wakf Act, 1954, Wakf Act, 1954 with Notifications, Wakf Properties

Supreme Court Clarifies Res Judicata in Property Dispute: Jamia Masjid vs. K V Rudrappa (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Applicability of Res Judicata in property disputes, particularly concerning representative suits and compromise decrees. CASE TYPE: Civil. Case Name: The Jamia Masjid vs. Sri K V Rudrappa (Since Dead) By Lrs. & Ors. Judgment Date: 23 September 2021

Supreme Court Clarifies Res Judicata in Property Dispute: Jamia Masjid vs. K V Rudrappa (23 September 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Restrains Interference in Church Dispute: Fr. Issac Mattammel vs. St. Mary’s Orthodox Syrian Church (2019)

/ Arun Mishra, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order 1 Rule 8, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 11, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 141, Constitutional Law with Article 144, Judges, M.R. Shah, Res Judicata

Supreme Court Restrains Interference in Church Dispute: Fr. Issac Mattammel vs. St. Mary’s Orthodox Syrian Church (2019) Date of the Judgment: September 6, 2019 Citation: (2019) INSC 859 Judges: Hon’ble Justices Arun Mishra and M.R. Shah Can lower courts disregard Supreme Court decisions? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this critical question in a

Supreme Court Restrains Interference in Church Dispute: Fr. Issac Mattammel vs. St. Mary’s Orthodox Syrian Church (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles the application of Res Judicata in Industrial Disputes: FACT Employees Association vs. FACT Ltd (11 April 2019)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 11, Indu Malhotra, Industrial Adjudication, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 10, Judges, Res Judicata

Supreme Court Upholds Res Judicata in Industrial Dispute: FACT Employees Association vs. FACT Ltd (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the principle of res judicata applies to industrial disputes, preventing re-litigation of previously decided issues. CASE TYPE: Industrial Dispute Case Name: Chairman and Managing Director, The Fertilizers And Chemicals Tranvancore Ltd. & Anr. vs. General Secretary FACT

Supreme Court settles the application of Res Judicata in Industrial Disputes: FACT Employees Association vs. FACT Ltd (11 April 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Constructive Res Judicata in Land Dispute: Asgar & Ors. vs. Mohan Varma & Ors. (2019)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 11, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Hemant Gupta, Judges, Kerala Compensation for Tenants Improvements Act, 1958, Kerala Compensation for Tenants Improvements Act, 1958 with Section 4(1), Kerala Compensation for Tenants Improvements Act, 1958 with Section 5, Order XXI of Code of Civil Procedure, Res Judicata

Supreme Court Upholds Constructive Res Judicata in Land Dispute: Asgar & Ors. vs. Mohan Varma & Ors. (2019) Date of the Judgment: 05 February 2019 Citation: 2019 INSC 87 Judges: Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J and Hemant Gupta, J. Can a party raise a claim in a subsequent proceeding that they could have raised in

Supreme Court Upholds Constructive Res Judicata in Land Dispute: Asgar & Ors. vs. Mohan Varma & Ors. (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Partition Rights: Govindammal vs. Vaidiyanathan (2018)

/ Adverse Possession, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 11, Court Auction, Judges, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, N.V. Ramana, Partition, Property Law, Res Judicata

Supreme Court Upholds Partition Rights: Govindammal vs. Vaidiyanathan (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a court auction sale of a property can transfer a title greater than what the judgment debtor possessed and whether the principle of res judicata applies to co-defendants. CASE TYPE: Civil Property Dispute Case Name: Govindammal (Dead) By Lrs. and Ors. vs. Vaidiyanathan

Supreme Court Upholds Partition Rights: Govindammal vs. Vaidiyanathan (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Res Judicata Exceptions in Banking Dispute: Canara Bank vs. N.G. Subbaraya Setty (2018)

/ Adarsh Kumar Goel, Banking Regulation Act, 1949, Banking Regulation Act, 1949 with Section 6, Banking Regulation Act, 1949 with Section 8, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 11, Judges, R.F. Nariman, Res Judicata, Trade Marks Act, 1999, Trade Marks Act, 1999 with Section 45

Supreme Court Clarifies Res Judicata Exceptions in Banking Dispute: Canara Bank vs. N.G. Subbaraya Setty (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a prior judgment upholding a contract that violates statutory prohibitions operates as res judicata in subsequent proceedings. CASE TYPE: Banking Law, Contract Law, Civil Procedure. Case Name: Canara Bank vs. N.G. Subbaraya Setty & Anr. [Judgment

Supreme Court Clarifies Res Judicata Exceptions in Banking Dispute: Canara Bank vs. N.G. Subbaraya Setty (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles the application of Res Judicata in land ownership disputes: Andanur Kalamma vs. Gangamma (2018)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 11, D.Y. Chandrachud, Dipak Misra, Judges, Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964, Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 with Section 177

Supreme Court Upholds Res Judicata in Land Dispute: Andanur Kalamma vs. Gangamma (2018) Date of the Judgment: March 6, 2018 Citation: (2018) INSC 174 Judges: Dipak Misra, CJI, A.M. Khanwilkar, J., Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, J. Can a land dispute be re-litigated after multiple rounds of litigation in revenue and writ jurisdiction? The Supreme Court addressed

Supreme Court settles the application of Res Judicata in land ownership disputes: Andanur Kalamma vs. Gangamma (2018) Read Post »

Scroll to Top