Notice Requirements

Supreme Court clarifies the requirements for valid notice under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act: Principal Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s I-Ven Interactive Limited (2019)

/ Income Tax Act, 1961, Income Tax Act, 1961 with Section 143(2), Income Tax Act, 1961 with Section 143(3), Income Tax Act, 1961 with Section 14A, Income Tax Assessment, Indira Banerjee, Judges, M.R. Shah, Notice Requirements, Taxation, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Clarifies Notice Requirements under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a notice issued under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is valid if sent to the address available in the PAN database, even if the assessee has changed their address and not updated it with the Income […]

Supreme Court clarifies the requirements for valid notice under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act: Principal Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s I-Ven Interactive Limited (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of notice under Section 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure in Government Contract Disputes (30 April 2019)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 80, Contract Law, Government Contracts, Government Litigation, Judges, Notice Requirements, R. F. Nariman, Vineet Saran

Supreme Court Clarifies Notice Requirements under Section 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure in Government Contract Disputes Date of the Judgment: 30 April 2019 Citation: CIVIL APPEAL NOS.4495-4496 OF 2019 Judges: R. F. Nariman, J. and Vineet Saran, J. Can a government contractor proceed with a civil suit against the State without strictly adhering

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of notice under Section 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure in Government Contract Disputes (30 April 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Remands Consumer Case Due to Lack of Notice: Mangalam Homes & Resorts Pvt. Ltd. vs. Joy Kaliyavumkal (2018)

/ Civil Procedure, Consumer Dispute Redressal, Consumer Protection Act, Deepak Gupta, Judges, Madan B. Lokur, National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Notice Requirements, Procedural Fairness, Right to be Heard

Supreme Court Remands Consumer Case Due to Lack of Notice: Mangalam Homes & Resorts Pvt. Ltd. vs. Joy Kaliyavumkal (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) can proceed ex-parte without ensuring proper notice to the parties. CASE TYPE: Consumer Dispute Case Name: M/s Mangalam Homes & Resorts Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

Supreme Court Remands Consumer Case Due to Lack of Notice: Mangalam Homes & Resorts Pvt. Ltd. vs. Joy Kaliyavumkal (2018) Read Post »

Scroll to Top