Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order VI Rule 17

Supreme Court Remands Easement Case: Jayanandan vs. Suresh Kumar (2024) INSC 956

/ Amendment of Pleadings, Appellate Procedure, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order VI Rule 17

Supreme Court Remands Easement Case: Jayanandan vs. Suresh Kumar (2024) INSC 956 Date of the Judgment: December 2, 2024 Citation: 2024 INSC 956 Judges: B.V. Nagarathna, J., Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh, J. Can a court set aside a trial court’s decree based solely on an amended written statement without further evidence? The Supreme Court of India […]

Supreme Court Remands Easement Case: Jayanandan vs. Suresh Kumar (2024) INSC 956 Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows Amendment of Pleadings to Challenge Will in Property Dispute: Dinesh Goyal vs. Suman Agarwal (24 September 2024)

/ Amendment of Pleadings, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order VI Rule 17, Property Dispute, Succession Law, Will Validity

Supreme Court Allows Amendment of Pleadings to Challenge Will in Property Dispute: Dinesh Goyal vs. Suman Agarwal (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a court can allow the amendment of pleadings to challenge the genuineness of a will after the trial has commenced in a property dispute case. CASE TYPE: Civil, Property Dispute, Succession Case Name: Dinesh

Supreme Court Allows Amendment of Pleadings to Challenge Will in Property Dispute: Dinesh Goyal vs. Suman Agarwal (24 September 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order on Arbitration in Land Dispute: State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Satish Jain (2024) INSC 315

/ Arbitration Agreement, Arbitration Award, Arbitration Law, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order VI Rule 17, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order VII Rule 11, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 89

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order on Arbitration in Land Dispute: State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Satish Jain (2024) INSC 315 LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an arbitration award based on an agreement that relies on an ex-parte decree can be enforced after the ex-parte decree is set aside. CASE TYPE: Civil Case Name: State of

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order on Arbitration in Land Dispute: State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Satish Jain (2024) INSC 315 Read Post »

Supreme Court restricts amendment of pleadings at fag end of trial: Basavaraj vs. Indira (2024) INSC 151

/ Amendment of Pleadings, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order VI Rule 17, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XXIII Rule 3, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 59

Supreme Court on Amendment of Pleadings: Basavaraj vs. Indira (2024) INSC 151 Date of the Judgment: February 29, 2024 Citation: 2024 INSC 151 Judges: C.T. Ravikumar, J., Rajesh Bindal, J. Can a party amend their pleadings at the fag end of a trial to introduce a new claim, especially when a previous compromise decree exists?

Supreme Court restricts amendment of pleadings at fag end of trial: Basavaraj vs. Indira (2024) INSC 151 Read Post »

Supreme Court allows amendment of pleadings in mortgage redemption suit: Ganesh Prasad vs. Rajeshwar Prasad (2023)

/ Amendment of Pleadings, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order IX Rule 9, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order VI Rule 17, J. B. Pardiwala, Judges, Redemption of Mortgage, Sudhanshu Dhulia, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Transfer of Property Act, 1882 with Section 83

Supreme Court Allows Amendment of Pleadings in Mortgage Redemption Suit: Ganesh Prasad vs. Rajeshwar Prasad (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a plaintiff can amend their plaint to include alternative and potentially inconsistent pleas, particularly in a suit involving mortgage redemption and tenancy disputes. CASE TYPE: Civil (Mortgage Redemption, Tenancy Dispute) Case Name: Ganesh Prasad vs. Rajeshwar

Supreme Court allows amendment of pleadings in mortgage redemption suit: Ganesh Prasad vs. Rajeshwar Prasad (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows Amendment to Election Petition: Yendapalli Srinivasulu Reddy vs. Vemireddy Pattabhirami Reddy (2022)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order VI Rule 17, Dinesh Maheshwari, J.K. Maheshwari, Judges, Representation of the People Act, 1951, Representation of the People Act, 1951 with Section 100, Representation of the People Act, 1951 with Section 33A, Representation of the People Act, 1951 with Section 86

Supreme Court Allows Amendment to Election Petition: Yendapalli Srinivasulu Reddy vs. Vemireddy Pattabhirami Reddy (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an election petition can be amended to include a new ground of challenge related to non-disclosure of criminal antecedents, when the original petition alleged improper acceptance of nomination. CASE TYPE: Election Law. Case Name: Yendapalli Srinivasulu Reddy

Supreme Court Allows Amendment to Election Petition: Yendapalli Srinivasulu Reddy vs. Vemireddy Pattabhirami Reddy (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Remands Land Dispute Case: Farooqi Begum vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2022)

/ Civil Procedure, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order VI Rule 17, Judges, Land Reforms, S. Abdul Nazeer, U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1952, U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1952 with Bhumidhar, Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Remands Land Dispute Case: Farooqi Begum vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court erred in upholding the lower courts’ decision regarding the resumption of a land grant and the possession of the disputed property. CASE TYPE: Civil Land Dispute Case Name: Farooqi Begum (D) By Lrs. vs. The

Supreme Court Remands Land Dispute Case: Farooqi Begum vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2022) Read Post »

Amendment of Pleadings and Counterclaims in Matrimonial Disputes: Supreme Court clarifies in Nitaben Dinesh Patel vs. Dinesh Dahyabhai Patel (2021)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order VI Rule 17, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order VIII Rule 6A, Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 with Section 23A, Judges, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Clarifies Amendment of Pleadings and Counterclaims in Matrimonial Disputes: Nitaben Dinesh Patel vs. Dinesh Dahyabhai Patel (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a wife can amend her written statement to include a counterclaim seeking a declaration that her husband’s second marriage is void in a divorce proceeding. CASE TYPE: Matrimonial Dispute Case Name: Nitaben Dinesh

Amendment of Pleadings and Counterclaims in Matrimonial Disputes: Supreme Court clarifies in Nitaben Dinesh Patel vs. Dinesh Dahyabhai Patel (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows Amendment of Plaint to Include Necessary Party in Property Dispute: Kamlesh Gupta vs. Mangat Rai (2019)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order I Rule 10, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order VI Rule 17, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 151, Indira Banerjee, Judges, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Mortgage, Possession, Property Law

Supreme Court Allows Amendment of Plaint to Include Necessary Party in Property Dispute: Kamlesh Gupta vs. Mangat Rai (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a court can allow the amendment of a plaint to include a necessary party after the commencement of the trial. CASE TYPE: Civil Property Dispute Case Name: Kamlesh Gupta vs. Mangat Rai &

Supreme Court Allows Amendment of Plaint to Include Necessary Party in Property Dispute: Kamlesh Gupta vs. Mangat Rai (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Belated Amendment in Partition Suit: M. Revanna vs. Anjanamma (2019)

/ Amendment of Pleadings, Civil Law, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order VI Rule 17, Judges, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, N.V. Ramana, Partition Suit

Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Belated Amendment in Partition Suit: M. Revanna vs. Anjanamma (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a court can allow an amendment to a plaint after the trial has commenced, particularly when the amendment introduces a new and inconsistent case that was known to the party earlier. CASE TYPE: Civil (Partition Suit) Case

Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Belated Amendment in Partition Suit: M. Revanna vs. Anjanamma (2019) Read Post »

Scroll to Top