Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XIV Rule 2

Supreme Court clarifies contempt of court in property dispute: Shah Enterprises vs. Vaijayantibhen (2024)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order VII Rule 11(d), Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XIV Rule 2, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 11, Consent Decree, Contempt Jurisdiction, Contempt of Court, Land Disputes, Property Law

Supreme Court clarifies contempt of court in property dispute: Shah Enterprises vs. Vaijayantibhen (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether filing a civil suit that potentially contradicts a previous consent decree amounts to contempt of court. CASE TYPE: Contempt of Court, Property Law Case Name: M/S Shah Enterprises Thr. Padmaben Mansukhbhai Modi vs. Vaijayantiben Ranjitsingh Sawant & Ors. […]

Supreme Court clarifies contempt of court in property dispute: Shah Enterprises vs. Vaijayantibhen (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies procedure for preliminary issues in civil suits: Sathyanath vs. Sarojamani (2022)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XIV Rule 2, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XLI, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XX Rule 5, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 227, Hemant Gupta, Judges, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court clarifies procedure for preliminary issues in civil suits: Sathyanath vs. Sarojamani (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Procedure for framing preliminary issues in civil suits CASE TYPE: Civil Procedure Case Name: Sathyanath & Anr. vs. Sarojamani [Judgment Date]: 6 May 2022 Date of the Judgment: 6 May 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 445 Judges: Hemant Gupta, J.,

Supreme Court clarifies procedure for preliminary issues in civil suits: Sathyanath vs. Sarojamani (2022) Read Post »

Limitation in Property Disputes: Supreme Court Divided on Plaint Rejection in Saranpal Kaur Anand vs. Praduman Singh Chandhok (28 March 2022)

/ Bela M. Trivedi, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order VII Rule 11(d), Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XII Rule 6, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XIV Rule 2, Judges, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 58, Limitation Act, 1963 with Section 17, Limitation Act, 1963 with Section 3, Sanjiv Khanna

Supreme Court Addresses Limitation in Property Dispute: Saranpal Kaur Anand vs. Praduman Singh Chandhok (2022) Date of the Judgment: 28 March 2022 The Supreme Court of India heard a case regarding a property dispute where the main issue was whether the suit was filed within the time limit set by law. The case, *Saranpal Kaur

Limitation in Property Disputes: Supreme Court Divided on Plaint Rejection in Saranpal Kaur Anand vs. Praduman Singh Chandhok (28 March 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the determination of limitation in loan recovery suits in Mongia Realty vs. Manik Sethi (31 January 2022)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XIV Rule 2, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Judges, Limitation Act, Surya Kant

Supreme Court Clarifies Limitation for Loan Recovery Suits: Mongia Realty vs. Manik Sethi (2022) Date of the Judgment: 31 January 2022 Citation: Civil Appeal No 814 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No 26930 of 2019) Judges: Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J and Surya Kant, J. When can a court decide on the issue

Supreme Court clarifies the determination of limitation in loan recovery suits in Mongia Realty vs. Manik Sethi (31 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Limitation for Loan Recovery Suits: Mongia Realty vs. Manik Sethi (2022)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XIV Rule 2, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Judges, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 1, Surya Kant

Supreme Court Clarifies Limitation for Loan Recovery Suits: Mongia Realty vs. Manik Sethi (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the issue of limitation in a suit for recovery of money can be decided as a preliminary issue based on oral arguments alone, without considering evidence. CASE TYPE: Civil (Loan Recovery) Case Name: M/s Mongia Realty and Buildwell

Supreme Court Clarifies Limitation for Loan Recovery Suits: Mongia Realty vs. Manik Sethi (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies when limitation can be decided as a preliminary issue in loan recovery suits: Mongia Realty vs. Manik Sethi (2022)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XIV Rule 2, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Judges, Limitation Act, Limitation Act with Article 1, Surya Kant

Supreme Court Clarifies Limitation for Loan Recovery Suits: Mongia Realty vs. Manik Sethi (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the issue of limitation in a loan recovery suit can be decided as a preliminary issue without evidence. CASE TYPE: Civil (Loan Recovery) Case Name: M/s Mongia Realty and Buildwell Private Limited vs. Manik Sethi [Judgment Date]: 31

Supreme Court clarifies when limitation can be decided as a preliminary issue in loan recovery suits: Mongia Realty vs. Manik Sethi (2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top