Code of Civil Procedure, 1908

Supreme Court clarifies appealability of order for adding a party in Admiralty Suit: Owners and Parties Interested in the Vessel M.V. Polaris Galaxy vs. Banque Cantonale De Geneve (23 September 2022)

/ A. S. Bopanna, Admiralty (Jurisdiction and Settlement of Maritime Claims) Act, 2017, Admiralty Law, Admiralty Law with Section 14, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order I Rule 10(2), Commercial Courts Act, 2015, Commercial Law, Commercial Law with Section 13, Indira Banerjee, Judges

Supreme Court clarifies appealability of order for adding a party in Admiralty Suit: Owners and Parties Interested in the Vessel M.V. Polaris Galaxy vs. Banque Cantonale De Geneve (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an order for adding a party in an admiralty suit is appealable under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 and the Admiralty (Jurisdiction and […]

Supreme Court clarifies appealability of order for adding a party in Admiralty Suit: Owners and Parties Interested in the Vessel M.V. Polaris Galaxy vs. Banque Cantonale De Geneve (23 September 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Remands Forest Land Dispute: State of Karnataka vs. M.A. Mohamad Sanaulla (20 September 2022)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order 41 Rule 27, Hemant Gupta, Judges, Mysore Forest Regulations, Mysore Forest Regulations with Section 17, Mysore Forest Regulations with Section 4, Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Remands Forest Land Dispute: State of Karnataka vs. M.A. Mohamad Sanaulla (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the State was given adequate opportunity to present its case regarding a disputed land claimed as forest land. CASE TYPE: Civil dispute concerning land ownership and forest laws. Case Name: The State of Karnataka & Anr. vs. M.A.

Supreme Court Remands Forest Land Dispute: State of Karnataka vs. M.A. Mohamad Sanaulla (20 September 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Interim Order for Deposit of Awarded Amount in Arbitration Case: Sepco vs. Power Mech (19 September 2022)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 36, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 9, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order 41 Rule 5, Indira Banerjee, Judges, Krishna Murari

Supreme Court Upholds Interim Order for Deposit of Awarded Amount in Arbitration Case: Sepco vs. Power Mech LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a court can order a party to deposit the full arbitral award amount as a condition for staying the award’s enforcement. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: Sepco Electric Power Construction Corporation vs. Power Mech

Supreme Court Upholds Interim Order for Deposit of Awarded Amount in Arbitration Case: Sepco vs. Power Mech (19 September 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies property rights in passage dispute: Anil Kumar Modi vs. Tarsem Kumar Gupta (2022)

/ B.R. Gavai, C.T. Ravikumar, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Easementary Rights, Judges, Property Law, Property Rights, Res Judicata, Res Judicata, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908

Supreme Court clarifies property rights in passage dispute: Anil Kumar Modi vs. Tarsem Kumar Gupta (2022) Date of the Judgment: September 14, 2022 Citation: Not Available Judges: B.R. Gavai, J. and C.T. Ravikumar, J. Can a previous court ruling on a related issue prevent a later court from deciding on a different but connected issue?

Supreme Court clarifies property rights in passage dispute: Anil Kumar Modi vs. Tarsem Kumar Gupta (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Interim Relief in Arbitration: Essar House vs. Arcellor Mittal (2022)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 9, Arbitration Law, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XXXVIII Rule 5, Indira Banerjee, Interim Relief, Judges

Supreme Court Upholds Interim Relief in Arbitration: Essar House vs. Arcellor Mittal (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a court, while granting interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, is strictly bound by the procedural requirements of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), particularly Order XXXVIII Rule 5. CASE TYPE: Arbitration

Supreme Court Upholds Interim Relief in Arbitration: Essar House vs. Arcellor Mittal (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies lease agreement and mesne profits in property dispute: Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. vs. Sudera Realty Private Limited (2022)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 2(12), Judges, K.M. Joseph, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 113, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 51, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Transfer of Property Act, 1882 with Section 106, Transfer of Property Act, 1882 with Section 111, Transfer of Property Act, 1882 with Section 113

Supreme Court clarifies lease agreement and mesne profits in property dispute: Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. vs. Sudera Realty Private Limited (2022) Date of the Judgment: September 6, 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 784 Judges: K.M. Joseph, J. and Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J. Can a lease agreement be considered valid even if a formal deed was not

Supreme Court clarifies lease agreement and mesne profits in property dispute: Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. vs. Sudera Realty Private Limited (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court dismisses transfer petition, directs speedy trial in family dispute: Surjit Kishore Das vs. Ajay Kishore Das (2022)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 25, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 139A, Judges, S. Ravindra Bhat, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court dismisses transfer petition, directs speedy trial in family dispute: Surjit Kishore Das vs. Ajay Kishore Das (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a transfer petition should be allowed. CASE TYPE: Civil Case Name: Surjit Kishore Das vs. Ajay Kishore Das & Ors. Judgment Date: 05 September 2022 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 05 September 2022

Supreme Court dismisses transfer petition, directs speedy trial in family dispute: Surjit Kishore Das vs. Ajay Kishore Das (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court declines transfer of petitions in matrimonial dispute: Dr. Seema Sikka vs. Dr. Pranav Sikka (2022)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 139A, Inherent Powers, Judges, S. Ravindra Bhat, Transfer of Cases, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court declines transfer of petitions in matrimonial dispute: Dr. Seema Sikka vs. Dr. Pranav Sikka (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether to transfer petitions in matrimonial disputes from one family court to another. CASE TYPE: Matrimonial Dispute, Transfer Petition. Case Name: Dr. Seema Sikka vs. Dr. Pranav Sikka [Judgment Date]: September 5, 2022 Date of the

Supreme Court declines transfer of petitions in matrimonial dispute: Dr. Seema Sikka vs. Dr. Pranav Sikka (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Transfers Matrimonial Cases: Monika Kumari vs. Abhishek Yadav (2022)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 25, Family Law, Judges, S. Ravindra Bhat, Transfer of Matrimonial Cases, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Transfers Matrimonial Cases: Monika Kumari vs. Abhishek Yadav (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Transfer of matrimonial cases from one family court to another. CASE TYPE: Matrimonial Law Case Name: Monika Kumari vs. Abhishek Yadav [Judgment Date]: 05 September 2022 Date of the Judgment: 05 September 2022 Citation: Not Available Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, CJI and

Supreme Court Transfers Matrimonial Cases: Monika Kumari vs. Abhishek Yadav (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Transfers Matrimonial Case: Aprajita Chakraborty vs. Anirban Biswangri (2022)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 25, Judges, Matrimonial Law, S. Ravindra Bhat, Transfer of Cases, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Transfers Matrimonial Case: Aprajita Chakraborty vs. Anirban Biswangri (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Transfer of a matrimonial dispute case. CASE TYPE: Matrimonial Dispute Case Name: Aprajita Chakraborty vs. Anirban Biswangri Judgment Date: 05 September 2022 Date of the Judgment: 05 September 2022 Citation: Not Available Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, CJI and S. Ravindra Bhat, J.

Supreme Court Transfers Matrimonial Case: Aprajita Chakraborty vs. Anirban Biswangri (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders Transfer of Matrimonial Case: Pinki vs. Abhishek Kumar Singh (2022)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Family Law, Judges, Matrimonial Disputes, S. Ravindra Bhat, Transfer of Cases, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Transfers Matrimonial Case: Pinki vs. Abhishek Kumar Singh (2022) Date of the Judgment: September 5, 2022 Citation: Not Available Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, CJI, S. Ravindra Bhat, J. Can a wife seek the transfer of a matrimonial case filed by her husband to a court closer to her residence? The Supreme Court of

Supreme Court Orders Transfer of Matrimonial Case: Pinki vs. Abhishek Kumar Singh (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court transfers matrimonial case from Lucknow to Surat: Saloni Agrawal vs. Surbhit Mittal (2022)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 25, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 139A, Judges, S. Ravindra Bhat, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court transfers matrimonial case from Lucknow to Surat: Saloni Agrawal vs. Surbhit Mittal (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Transfer of matrimonial case from one family court to another. CASE TYPE: Matrimonial Law Case Name: Saloni Agrawal vs. Surbhit Mittal [Judgment Date]: September 5, 2022 Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 5, 2022 Citation: Not Available Judges:

Supreme Court transfers matrimonial case from Lucknow to Surat: Saloni Agrawal vs. Surbhit Mittal (2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top