Code of Civil Procedure, 1908

Supreme Court Upholds Auction Sale After 30-Year Land Acquisition Dispute: Jagan Singh & Co. vs. Ludhiana Improvement Trust (2022)

Supreme Court Upholds Auction Sale After 30-Year Land Acquisition Dispute: Jagan Singh & Co. vs. Ludhiana Improvement Trust (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an auction sale of property can be set aside due to procedural irregularities after multiple opportunities for objections were missed by the judgment debtor, and whether a bona fide auction purchaser’s rights are […]

Supreme Court Upholds Auction Sale After 30-Year Land Acquisition Dispute: Jagan Singh & Co. vs. Ludhiana Improvement Trust (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Powers of Delhi School Tribunal on Back Wages in Reinstatement Cases: Sunil Sikri vs. Guru Harkrishan Public School (28 July 2022)

Supreme Court Clarifies Powers of Delhi School Tribunal on Back Wages in Reinstatement Cases Date of the Judgment: 28 July 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 648 Judges: K.M. Joseph, J., Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J. Can a school tribunal order back wages when reinstating an employee, or is this decision solely within the purview of the school’s

Supreme Court Clarifies Powers of Delhi School Tribunal on Back Wages in Reinstatement Cases: Sunil Sikri vs. Guru Harkrishan Public School (28 July 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court allows substitution of legal heir despite other claimants: R. Krsna Murti vs. R.R. Jagadesan (21 July 2022)

Supreme Court Allows Substitution of Legal Heir Despite Other Claimants: R. Krsna Murti vs. R.R. Jagadesan (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a legal heir can be substituted in a suit when other legal heirs exist. CASE TYPE: Civil (Succession) Case Name: R. Krsna Murti vs. R.R. Jagadesan Judgment Date: 21 July 2022 Date of the Judgment:

Supreme Court allows substitution of legal heir despite other claimants: R. Krsna Murti vs. R.R. Jagadesan (21 July 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Remands Land Dispute Case: Farooqi Begum vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2022)

Supreme Court Remands Land Dispute Case: Farooqi Begum vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court erred in upholding the lower courts’ decision regarding the resumption of a land grant and the possession of the disputed property. CASE TYPE: Civil Land Dispute Case Name: Farooqi Begum (D) By Lrs. vs. The

Supreme Court Remands Land Dispute Case: Farooqi Begum vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Restricts Amendment of Pleadings to Challenge Mortgages: Asian Hotels (North) Ltd. vs. Alok Kumar Lodha & Ors. (2022)

Supreme Court Restricts Amendment of Pleadings to Challenge Mortgages: Asian Hotels (North) Ltd. vs. Alok Kumar Lodha & Ors. (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a plaintiff can amend their suit to challenge mortgages on a property when their original suit concerns the revocation of a license agreement. CASE TYPE: Civil. Case Name: Asian Hotels (North) Ltd.

Supreme Court Restricts Amendment of Pleadings to Challenge Mortgages: Asian Hotels (North) Ltd. vs. Alok Kumar Lodha & Ors. (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Striking Off Defence for Non-Payment of Rent: Asha Rani Gupta vs. Vineet Kumar (2022)

Supreme Court Upholds Striking Off Defence for Non-Payment of Rent: Asha Rani Gupta vs. Vineet Kumar (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a tenant’s defense can be struck off for failing to deposit rent as per Order XV Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, even if the tenant denies the landlord-tenant relationship. CASE TYPE:

Supreme Court Upholds Striking Off Defence for Non-Payment of Rent: Asha Rani Gupta vs. Vineet Kumar (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Temple’s Right Over Dedicated Jewelry: R.M. Sundaram vs. Sri Kayarohanasamy Temple (2022)

Supreme Court Upholds Temple’s Right Over Dedicated Jewelry: R.M. Sundaram vs. Sri Kayarohanasamy Temple (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether certain jewelry kept in a temple vault constitutes a specific endowment for the deity or belongs to the family that placed it there. CASE TYPE: Religious Endowment/Civil Case Name: R.M. Sundaram @ Meenakshisundaram v. Sri Kayarohanasamy and

Supreme Court Upholds Temple’s Right Over Dedicated Jewelry: R.M. Sundaram vs. Sri Kayarohanasamy Temple (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Restores Consent Decree in Property Dispute: Hemantha Kumar vs. R. Mahadevaiah (2022)

Supreme Court Restores Consent Decree in Property Dispute: Hemantha Kumar vs. R. Mahadevaiah (2022) Date of the Judgment: July 11, 2022 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 4108 of 2022 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and B.V. Nagarathna, J. Can a consent decree, agreed upon by all parties and initially approved by a trial court, be overturned simply

Supreme Court Restores Consent Decree in Property Dispute: Hemantha Kumar vs. R. Mahadevaiah (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Refuses to Transfer Arbitration Case Based on Territorial Jurisdiction: Neilan International Co. Ltd. vs. Powerica Limited & Ors. (2022)

Supreme Court Refuses to Transfer Arbitration Case Based on Territorial Jurisdiction Date of the Judgment: July 6, 2022 Judges: J.K. Maheshwari, J. Can the Supreme Court transfer a case based on a challenge to the territorial jurisdiction of a lower court? The Supreme Court recently addressed this question in a transfer petition related to an

Supreme Court Refuses to Transfer Arbitration Case Based on Territorial Jurisdiction: Neilan International Co. Ltd. vs. Powerica Limited & Ors. (2022) Read Post »

Maintainability of Single Appeal: Supreme Court clarifies procedure for consolidated suits in Ramnath Exports vs. Vinita Mehta (2022)

Supreme Court on Maintainability of Single Appeal Against Consolidated Judgments LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a single appeal is maintainable against a common judgment and two separate decrees passed in two consolidated suits. CASE TYPE: Civil Procedure Case Name: M/S Ramnath Exports Pvt. Ltd. vs. Vinita Mehta & Anr. Judgment Date: 05 July 2022 Introduction Date of

Maintainability of Single Appeal: Supreme Court clarifies procedure for consolidated suits in Ramnath Exports vs. Vinita Mehta (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Arbitration Under Section 21 of the Arbitration Act, 1940: M.P. Rajya Tilhan Utpadak vs. Modi Transport (2022)

Supreme Court Clarifies Arbitration Under Section 21 of the Arbitration Act, 1940: M.P. Rajya Tilhan Utpadak vs. Modi Transport (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a matter in a pending suit can be referred to arbitration under Section 21 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 without a clear agreement between all parties. CASE TYPE: Civil Case Name: M.P.

Supreme Court Clarifies Arbitration Under Section 21 of the Arbitration Act, 1940: M.P. Rajya Tilhan Utpadak vs. Modi Transport (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies procedure for preliminary issues in civil suits: Sathyanath vs. Sarojamani (2022)

Supreme Court clarifies procedure for preliminary issues in civil suits: Sathyanath vs. Sarojamani (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Procedure for framing preliminary issues in civil suits CASE TYPE: Civil Procedure Case Name: Sathyanath & Anr. vs. Sarojamani [Judgment Date]: 6 May 2022 Date of the Judgment: 6 May 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 445 Judges: Hemant Gupta, J.,

Supreme Court clarifies procedure for preliminary issues in civil suits: Sathyanath vs. Sarojamani (2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top