Code of Civil Procedure, 1908

Supreme Court Remands Eviction Case Due to Procedural Error: Arulmighu Nellukadai Mariamman Tirukkoil vs. Tamilarasi (Dead) (2019)

Supreme Court Remands Eviction Case Due to Procedural Error: Arulmighu Nellukadai Mariamman Tirukkoil vs. Tamilarasi (Dead) (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Procedural compliance in second appeals before the High Court. CASE TYPE: Civil Case Name: Arulmighu Nellukadai Mariamman Tirukkoil vs. Tamilarasi (Dead) By LRs. [Judgment Date]: May 7, 2019 Date of the Judgment: May 7, 2019 Citation: […]

Supreme Court Remands Eviction Case Due to Procedural Error: Arulmighu Nellukadai Mariamman Tirukkoil vs. Tamilarasi (Dead) (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court rules on Abatement of Appeals in Joint Property Disputes: Hemareddi vs. Ramachandra (2019)

Supreme Court on Abatement of Appeals in Joint Property Disputes: Hemareddi vs. Ramachandra (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an appeal filed jointly by two brothers abates entirely if one brother dies and his legal representatives are not brought on record, particularly in a dispute regarding joint family property and adoption. CASE TYPE: Civil (Property Law) Case

Supreme Court rules on Abatement of Appeals in Joint Property Disputes: Hemareddi vs. Ramachandra (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Ex-Parte Decree After Dismissal of Order IX Rule 13 Application: Bhivchandra Shankar More vs. Balu Gangaram More (2019)

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Ex-Parte Decree After Dismissal of Order IX Rule 13 Application: Bhivchandra Shankar More vs. Balu Gangaram More (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether time spent pursuing an application to set aside an ex-parte decree constitutes sufficient cause for condoning delay in filing a first appeal against that decree. CASE TYPE: Civil. Case

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Ex-Parte Decree After Dismissal of Order IX Rule 13 Application: Bhivchandra Shankar More vs. Balu Gangaram More (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows Additional Evidence in Consumer Dispute: Jiten K. Ajmera vs. Tejas Co-operative Housing Society (2019)

Supreme Court Allows Additional Evidence in Consumer Dispute: Jiten K. Ajmera vs. Tejas Co-operative Housing Society (2019) Date of the Judgment: May 6, 2019 Citation: 2019 INSC 448 Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, J., Indu Malhotra, J. Can new evidence be introduced at the appellate stage in a consumer dispute? The Supreme Court of India addressed

Supreme Court Allows Additional Evidence in Consumer Dispute: Jiten K. Ajmera vs. Tejas Co-operative Housing Society (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Self-Acquired Property Rights in Family Dispute: S. Subramanian vs. S. Ramasamy (2019)

Supreme Court Upholds Self-Acquired Property Rights in Family Dispute: S. Subramanian vs. S. Ramasamy (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether self-acquired property of a Hindu individual can be considered as joint family property through blending. CASE TYPE: Civil (Property Law, Family Law) Case Name: S.Subramanian vs. S. Ramasamy Etc. Etc. [Judgment Date]: May 1, 2019 Introduction Date

Supreme Court Upholds Self-Acquired Property Rights in Family Dispute: S. Subramanian vs. S. Ramasamy (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Family Settlement, Rejects High Court’s View on Registration: Thulasidhara vs. Narayanappa (2019)

Supreme Court Upholds Family Settlement, Rejects High Court’s View on Registration: Thulasidhara vs. Narayanappa (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an unregistered family settlement document requires mandatory registration to be admissible as evidence and whether a party can challenge a sale deed without filing a separate suit. CASE TYPE: Civil (Property Dispute) Case Name: Thulasidhara & Another

Supreme Court Upholds Family Settlement, Rejects High Court’s View on Registration: Thulasidhara vs. Narayanappa (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of notice under Section 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure in Government Contract Disputes (30 April 2019)

Supreme Court Clarifies Notice Requirements under Section 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure in Government Contract Disputes Date of the Judgment: 30 April 2019 Citation: CIVIL APPEAL NOS.4495-4496 OF 2019 Judges: R. F. Nariman, J. and Vineet Saran, J. Can a government contractor proceed with a civil suit against the State without strictly adhering

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of notice under Section 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure in Government Contract Disputes (30 April 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Settles Property Dispute Through Amicable Settlement: Piara Singh vs. Kundan Singh (2019)

Supreme Court Settles Property Dispute Through Amicable Settlement: Piara Singh vs. Kundan Singh (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Property dispute resolution through amicable settlement. CASE TYPE: Civil Case Name: Piara Singh (Since Deceased) Through His Lrs. Gurmeet Singh & Ors. vs. Kundan Singh (D) Thr. His Legal Heirs Jagjit Singh & Ors. Judgment Date: April 30, 2019

Supreme Court Settles Property Dispute Through Amicable Settlement: Piara Singh vs. Kundan Singh (2019) Read Post »

Abatement of Appeals: Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Dispute: Goli Vijayalakshmi & Ors. vs. Yendru Sathiraju (26 April 2019)

Supreme Court Abatement Ruling: Goli Vijayalakshmi vs. Yendru Sathiraju (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an appeal abates in its entirety when one of the appellants dies and their legal representatives are not brought on record, particularly in cases involving joint and indivisible decrees. CASE TYPE: Civil Property Dispute Case Name: Goli Vijayalakshmi & Ors. vs. Yendru

Abatement of Appeals: Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Dispute: Goli Vijayalakshmi & Ors. vs. Yendru Sathiraju (26 April 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Remands Second Appeal for Fresh Hearing: Ranjit Kumar Karmakar vs. Hari Shankar Das (2019)

Supreme Court Remands Second Appeal for Fresh Hearing: Ranjit Kumar Karmakar vs. Hari Shankar Das (2019) Date of the Judgment: April 16, 2019 Citation: 2019 INSC 386 Judges: Abhay Manohar Sapre, J., Dinesh Maheshwari, J. Can a High Court, in a second appeal, decide the case without addressing the substantial questions of law it initially

Supreme Court Remands Second Appeal for Fresh Hearing: Ranjit Kumar Karmakar vs. Hari Shankar Das (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Restores Possession After Ex-Parte Decree Set Aside: Om Prakash Ram vs. State of Bihar (2019)

Supreme Court Restores Possession After Ex-Parte Decree Set Aside: Om Prakash Ram vs. State of Bihar (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether possession obtained through an ex-parte decree can be sustained if the decree is subsequently set aside. CASE TYPE: Civil Case Name: Om Prakash Ram vs. The State of Bihar & Ors. Judgment Date: April 15,

Supreme Court Restores Possession After Ex-Parte Decree Set Aside: Om Prakash Ram vs. State of Bihar (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles the application of Res Judicata in Industrial Disputes: FACT Employees Association vs. FACT Ltd (11 April 2019)

Supreme Court Upholds Res Judicata in Industrial Dispute: FACT Employees Association vs. FACT Ltd (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the principle of res judicata applies to industrial disputes, preventing re-litigation of previously decided issues. CASE TYPE: Industrial Dispute Case Name: Chairman and Managing Director, The Fertilizers And Chemicals Tranvancore Ltd. & Anr. vs. General Secretary FACT

Supreme Court settles the application of Res Judicata in Industrial Disputes: FACT Employees Association vs. FACT Ltd (11 April 2019) Read Post »

Scroll to Top