Code of Civil Procedure, 1908

Supreme Court Modifies Compensation Calculation for Delayed Flat Possession: Kaushik Narsinhbhai Patel & Ors. vs. M/s. S.J.R. Prime Corporation Private Limited (22 July 2024)

/ Breach of contract, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order VI, Rule 1, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order VI, Rule 2, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order VI, Rule 7, Construction Agreement, Consumer Protection Act, 2019, Consumer Protection Act, 2019 with Section 38(3)(a), Consumer Protection Act, 2019 with Section 38(9), Contract Law

Supreme Court Modifies Compensation Calculation for Delayed Flat Possession: Kaushik Narsinhbhai Patel & Ors. vs. M/s. S.J.R. Prime Corporation Private Limited (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Calculation of compensation for delayed possession of flats. CASE TYPE: Consumer Case Name: Kaushik Narsinhbhai Patel & Ors. vs. M/s. S.J.R. Prime Corporation Private Limited Judgment Date: 22 July 2024 Date […]

Supreme Court Modifies Compensation Calculation for Delayed Flat Possession: Kaushik Narsinhbhai Patel & Ors. vs. M/s. S.J.R. Prime Corporation Private Limited (22 July 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Requirements for Valid Compromise Decrees in Property Disputes: Amro Devi & Ors. vs. Julfi Ram (Deceased) Thr.Lrs. & Ors. (2024) INSC 527 (15 July 2024)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XXIII Rule 3, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Transfer of Property Act, 1882 with Section 52

Supreme Court Clarifies Requirements for Valid Compromise Decrees in Property Disputes Date of the Judgment: 15 July 2024 Citation: (2024) INSC 527 Judges: Justice Vikram Nath and Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Can a simple statement in court lead to a valid compromise decree, especially when it concerns property rights? The Supreme Court of India recently

Supreme Court Clarifies Requirements for Valid Compromise Decrees in Property Disputes: Amro Devi & Ors. vs. Julfi Ram (Deceased) Thr.Lrs. & Ors. (2024) INSC 527 (15 July 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the application of Res Judicata between Co-defendants in Property Dispute: Har Narayan Tewari vs. Cantonment Board (2024)

/ Adverse Possession, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 11, Land Ownership, Property Law, Res Judicata

Supreme Court Clarifies Res Judicata in Property Dispute: Har Narayan Tewari vs. Cantonment Board (2024) Date of the Judgment: July 08, 2024 Citation: 2024 INSC 467 Judges: Justice Abhay S. Oka and Justice Pankaj Mithal Can a previous suit between a plaintiff and multiple defendants bar a subsequent suit between the co-defendants? The Supreme Court

Supreme Court clarifies the application of Res Judicata between Co-defendants in Property Dispute: Har Narayan Tewari vs. Cantonment Board (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of second appeals under the Punjab Courts Act: Lehna Singh vs. Gurnam Singh (2024)

/ Appeals, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 100, Punjab Courts Act, 1918, Punjab Courts Act, 1918 with Section 41, Second Appeals

Supreme Court Clarifies Second Appeal Jurisdiction in Punjab Courts Act: Lehna Singh vs. Gurnam Singh (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Scope of second appeal under Section 41 of the Punjab Courts Act, 1918 and its interplay with Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. CASE TYPE: Civil Case Name: Lehna Singh (D) By Lrs. vs.

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of second appeals under the Punjab Courts Act: Lehna Singh vs. Gurnam Singh (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Restores Property After Decree Modification: Bhikchand vs. Shamabai (2024)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XXI Rule 54, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XXI Rule 66, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 144

Supreme Court Restores Property After Decree Modification: Bhikchand vs. Shamabai (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a judgment debtor is entitled to restitution of property sold in execution of a decree, when that decree is subsequently varied by an appellate court. CASE TYPE: Civil Case Name: Bhikchand S/O Dhondiram Mutha (Deceased) Through Lrs. vs. Shamabai Dhanraj Gugale

Supreme Court Restores Property After Decree Modification: Bhikchand vs. Shamabai (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court on Stranger’s Application for Suit Restoration: Vijay Laxman Bhawe vs. P & S Nirman Pvt. Ltd. (2024)

/ Civil Law, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order IX, Order IX, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Restoration of Suit

Supreme Court on Stranger’s Application for Suit Restoration: Vijay Laxman Bhawe vs. P & S Nirman Pvt. Ltd. (2024) Date of the Judgment: 8th May 2024 Citation: 2024 INSC 394 Judges: B.R. Gavai, J. and Sandeep Mehta, J. Can a third party, not originally involved in a lawsuit, seek to revive a dismissed case? The

Supreme Court on Stranger’s Application for Suit Restoration: Vijay Laxman Bhawe vs. P & S Nirman Pvt. Ltd. (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court allows deficit deposit in pre-emption suit: Kanihya vs. Sukhi Ram (2024)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 148, Pre-emption Law, Pre-emption Suit

Supreme Court allows deficit deposit in pre-emption suit: Kanihya vs. Sukhi Ram (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a court can extend the time for depositing the full amount in a pre-emption suit when a minor deficit occurs due to a calculation error. CASE TYPE: Civil Pre-emption Suit. Case Name: Kanihya @ Kanhi (Dead) Through Lrs. vs.

Supreme Court allows deficit deposit in pre-emption suit: Kanihya vs. Sukhi Ram (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Decree in Property Dispute: Rehan Ahmed vs. Akhtar Un Nisa (2024)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XXIII, Rule 3, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 47, Property Law

Supreme Court Upholds Decree in Property Dispute: Rehan Ahmed vs. Akhtar Un Nisa (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Validity of a compromise decree in a property dispute when one of the original defendants was later removed from the suit. CASE TYPE: Civil Property Dispute Case Name: Rehan Ahmed (D) Thr. L Rs. vs. Akhtar Un Nisa (D)

Supreme Court Upholds Decree in Property Dispute: Rehan Ahmed vs. Akhtar Un Nisa (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Forest Land Status, Rejects Review Based on New Evidence: State of Telangana vs. Mohd. Abdul Qasim (2024) INSC 310 (18 April 2024)

/ Andhra Pradesh Forest Act, 1967, Andhra Pradesh Forest Act, 1967 with Section 15, Andhra Pradesh Forest Act, 1967 with Section 16, Andhra Pradesh Forest Act, 1967 with Section 4, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XLVII Rule 1, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 114, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 48A, Constitutional Law with Article 51A, Fundamental Rights

Supreme Court Upholds Forest Land Status, Rejects Review Based on New Evidence: State of Telangana vs. Mohd. Abdul Qasim (2024) INSC 310 (18 April 2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a High Court can review a judgment based on new evidence that surfaces after the original judgment, especially when the new evidence is from an authority lacking

Supreme Court Upholds Forest Land Status, Rejects Review Based on New Evidence: State of Telangana vs. Mohd. Abdul Qasim (2024) INSC 310 (18 April 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order on Arbitration in Land Dispute: State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Satish Jain (2024) INSC 315

/ Arbitration Agreement, Arbitration Award, Arbitration Law, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order VI Rule 17, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order VII Rule 11, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 89

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order on Arbitration in Land Dispute: State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Satish Jain (2024) INSC 315 LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an arbitration award based on an agreement that relies on an ex-parte decree can be enforced after the ex-parte decree is set aside. CASE TYPE: Civil Case Name: State of

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order on Arbitration in Land Dispute: State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Satish Jain (2024) INSC 315 Read Post »

Territorial Jurisdiction in Shipping Disputes: Supreme Court Affirms Delhi Court’s Authority in Arcadia Shipping Ltd. vs. Tata Steel Ltd. (2024)

/ Bill of Lading, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order I Rule 3, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order I Rule 7, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 20, Shipping Law, Territorial Jurisdiction

Supreme Court Upholds Delhi Court’s Jurisdiction in Shipping Dispute: Arcadia Shipping Ltd. vs. Tata Steel Ltd. (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Determining territorial jurisdiction in cases involving interconnected transactions of sale and shipment of goods. CASE TYPE: Civil. Case Name: Arcadia Shipping Ltd. vs. Tata Steel Limited and Others. [Judgment Date]: April 16, 2024 Introduction Date of

Territorial Jurisdiction in Shipping Disputes: Supreme Court Affirms Delhi Court’s Authority in Arcadia Shipping Ltd. vs. Tata Steel Ltd. (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Dismisses Election Petition for Lack of Material Facts: Karim Uddin Barbhuiya vs. Aminul Haque Laskar (2024)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order VII Rule 11, Corrupt Practices, The Representation of the People Act, 1951, The Representation of the People Act, 1951 with Section 100, The Representation of the People Act, 1951 with Section 83

Supreme Court Dismisses Election Petition for Lack of Material Facts: Karim Uddin Barbhuiya vs. Aminul Haque Laskar (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an election petition can be dismissed for not stating material facts and full particulars of corrupt practices. CASE TYPE: Election Law Case Name: Karim Uddin Barbhuiya vs. Aminul Haque Laskar & Ors. [Judgment Date]:

Supreme Court Dismisses Election Petition for Lack of Material Facts: Karim Uddin Barbhuiya vs. Aminul Haque Laskar (2024) Read Post »

Scroll to Top