Code of Civil Procedure with Order 9 Rule 13

Supreme Court settles the mandatory deposit for setting aside ex-parte decrees in Small Cause Court Cases: Subodh Kumar vs. Shamim Ahmed (2021) INSC 123 (03 March 2021)

/ Ashok Bhushan, Code of Civil Procedure, Code of Civil Procedure with Order 9 Rule 13, Judges, Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887, Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 with Section 17, R. Subhash Reddy

Supreme Court Clarifies Mandatory Deposit for Setting Aside Ex-Parte Decrees in Small Cause Court Cases Date of the Judgment: 03 March 2021 Citation: (2021) INSC 123 Judges: Ashok Bhushan, J., R. Subhash Reddy, J. Can a tenant’s application to set aside an ex-parte decree be rejected if they fail to deposit the full decretal amount […]

Supreme Court settles the mandatory deposit for setting aside ex-parte decrees in Small Cause Court Cases: Subodh Kumar vs. Shamim Ahmed (2021) INSC 123 (03 March 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles the scope of Order 9 Rule 13 of CPC in setting aside ex-parte decrees: Bank of India vs. M/s Mehta Brothers (23 September 2008)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, Code of Civil Procedure with Order 9 Rule 13, Dalveer Bhandari, Judges, Tarun Chatterjee

Introduction Date of the Judgment: 23 September 2008 Citation: Where available, provide the case citation in the Indian Supreme Court (INSC) format. Judges: Justice Tarun Chatterjee, Justice Dalveer Bhandari When can a court set aside a decree against some defendants when only one defendant applies to set aside an ex-parte decree? The Supreme Court of

Supreme Court settles the scope of Order 9 Rule 13 of CPC in setting aside ex-parte decrees: Bank of India vs. M/s Mehta Brothers (23 September 2008) Read Post »

Scroll to Top