Code of Civil Procedure with Order IX Rule 13

Supreme Court sets aside condonation of delay in filing appeal against ex-parte decree: Thirunagalingam vs. Lingeswaran (2025) INSC 672 (May 13, 2025)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Code of Civil Procedure, Code of Civil Procedure with Order IX Rule 13, Code of Civil Procedure with Order XLI Rule 3A, Code of Civil Procedure with Section 96(2), Judges, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Section 14, Limitation Act, 1963 with Section 5, Satish Chandra Sharma

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a delay in filing an appeal against an ex-parte decree can be condoned when the reasons for the delay have already been adjudicated upon in previous proceedings. CASE TYPE: Civil Appeal Case Name: Thirunagalingam vs. Lingeswaran & Anr. Judgment Date: May 13, 2025 Introduction Date of the Judgment: May 13, 2025 Citation: […]

Supreme Court sets aside condonation of delay in filing appeal against ex-parte decree: Thirunagalingam vs. Lingeswaran (2025) INSC 672 (May 13, 2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows Tenant to Challenge Eviction Despite Previous Orders: Rekha Gurunath Mhashelkar vs. Yashwant Vichare (2018)

/ Civil Law, Code of Civil Procedure, Code of Civil Procedure with Order IX Rule 13, Eviction, Judges, Kurian Joseph, Sanjay Kishan Kaul

Supreme Court Allows Tenant to Challenge Eviction Despite Previous Orders: Rekha Gurunath Mhashelkar vs. Yashwant Vichare (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a tenant can pursue legal remedies against an eviction order despite prior ex-parte decrees and execution. CASE TYPE: Civil (Eviction) Case Name: Rekha Gurunath Mhashelkar vs. Yashwant Vichare Judgment Date: 19 September 2018 Date of

Supreme Court Allows Tenant to Challenge Eviction Despite Previous Orders: Rekha Gurunath Mhashelkar vs. Yashwant Vichare (2018) Read Post »

Scroll to Top