Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 177

Supreme Court clarifies jurisdiction for anticipatory bail in cross-state cases: Priya Indoria vs. State of Karnataka (2023) INSC 1008 (20 November 2023)

/ Bail Provisions, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 177, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 438, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 21, Fundamental Rights

Supreme Court Clarifies Jurisdiction for Anticipatory Bail in Cross-State Cases LEGAL ISSUE: The legal issue addressed is whether a High Court or Court of Session can grant anticipatory bail for an offense registered outside its territorial jurisdiction. CASE TYPE: This case falls under Criminal Law, specifically dealing with anticipatory bail. Case Name: Priya Indoria vs. […]

Supreme Court clarifies jurisdiction for anticipatory bail in cross-state cases: Priya Indoria vs. State of Karnataka (2023) INSC 1008 (20 November 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders Transfer of Criminal Case Back to Delhi: Swaati Nirkhi vs. State (NCT of Delhi) (9 March 2021)

/ Ashok Bhushan, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 177, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 34, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 389, Indu Malhotra, Judges, Jurisdiction

Supreme Court Orders Transfer of Criminal Case Back to Delhi: Swaati Nirkhi vs. State (NCT of Delhi) (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: The primary legal issue revolves around the appropriate jurisdiction for the trial of a criminal case, specifically concerning where the cause of action arose. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law – Transfer Petition Case Name: Swaati Nirkhi

Supreme Court Orders Transfer of Criminal Case Back to Delhi: Swaati Nirkhi vs. State (NCT of Delhi) (9 March 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies territorial jurisdiction in criminal cases: Kaushik Chatterjee vs. State of Haryana (30 September 2020)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 177, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 462, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 26, Judges, Offences, Territorial Jurisdiction, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Addresses Territorial Jurisdiction in Criminal Cases: Kaushik Chatterjee vs. State of Haryana (2020) Date of the Judgment: 30 September 2020 Citation: 2020 INSC 716 Judges: Justice V. Ramasubramanian Can a criminal case be transferred simply because the accused claims the location of the crime doesn’t fall under the jurisdiction of the court where

Supreme Court clarifies territorial jurisdiction in criminal cases: Kaushik Chatterjee vs. State of Haryana (30 September 2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court expands jurisdiction for Section 498A cases: Rupali Devi vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2019)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 177, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 179, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 498A, Judges, Jurisdiction of Courts, L. Nageswara Rao, Offences Relating to Marriage, Ranjan Gogoi, Sanjay Kishan Kaul

Supreme Court expands jurisdiction for Section 498A cases: Rupali Devi vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a wife can initiate legal proceedings under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code at her parental home, after leaving her matrimonial home due to cruelty. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Rupali Devi vs. State

Supreme Court expands jurisdiction for Section 498A cases: Rupali Devi vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court expands jurisdiction in Section 498A cases: Rupali Devi vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2019)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 177, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 178, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 179, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 498A, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Ranjan Gogoi, Sanjay Kishan Kaul

Supreme Court expands jurisdiction in Section 498A cases: Rupali Devi vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a wife can file a case of cruelty under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code at her parental home, after being forced to leave her matrimonial home due to cruelty. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case

Supreme Court expands jurisdiction in Section 498A cases: Rupali Devi vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Expands Jurisdiction in 498A Cases: Rupali Devi vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2019)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 177, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 179, Cruelty against women, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 498A, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Ranjan Gogoi, Sanjay Kishan Kaul

Supreme Court Expands Jurisdiction in 498A Cases: Rupali Devi vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a wife can file a case of cruelty under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code at the place where she is taking shelter after leaving her matrimonial home. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Rupali Devi

Supreme Court Expands Jurisdiction in 498A Cases: Rupali Devi vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Jurisdiction in Cheque Dishonor Cases: Nishant Aggarwal vs. Kailash Kumar Sharma (2013)

/ Cheque Dishonor, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 177, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 178, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 179, Jagdish Singh Khehar, Judges, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 with Section 138, P. Sathasivam, Territorial Jurisdiction

Date of the Judgment: July 1, 2013 Citation: 2013 INSC 478 Judges: P. Sathasivam, J., Jagdish Singh Khehar, J. Can a court where a cheque is deposited for collection have jurisdiction in a cheque bounce case? The Supreme Court addressed this question in a dispute between Nishant Aggarwal and Kailash Kumar Sharma. The core issue

Supreme Court Clarifies Jurisdiction in Cheque Dishonor Cases: Nishant Aggarwal vs. Kailash Kumar Sharma (2013) Read Post »

Scroll to Top