Supreme Court Orders Concurrent Sentences in Electricity Theft Case: Iqram vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2022)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 265-G, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 427, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Electricity Act, 2003, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 136, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 411, Judges, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Plea Bargaining

Supreme Court Orders Concurrent Sentences in Electricity Theft Case: Iqram vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether sentences for multiple convictions should run consecutively or concurrently when no specific direction is given by the trial court under Section 427(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law. Case Name: Iqram […]

Supreme Court Orders Concurrent Sentences in Electricity Theft Case: Iqram vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2022) Read Post »