Code of Criminal Procedure with Section 482

Supreme Court Settles Child Custody Dispute: Purvi Mukesh Gada vs. Mukesh Popatlal Gada (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Determining the paramount consideration in child custody disputes. CASE TYPE: Criminal Appeal (arising out of Special Leave Petition) relating to child custody. Case Name: Purvi Mukesh Gada vs. Mukesh Popatlal Gada & Anr. [Judgment Date]: September 4, 2017 Introduction The Supreme Court of India, in Purvi Mukesh Gada vs. Mukesh Popatlal Gada & […]

Supreme Court Settles Child Custody Dispute: Purvi Mukesh Gada vs. Mukesh Popatlal Gada (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court issues guidelines to prevent misuse of Section 498A IPC in matrimonial cases: Rajesh Sharma & Ors. vs. State of U.P. & Anr. (27 July 2017)

Can the criminal justice system be used to harass innocent family members in matrimonial disputes? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical issue in Rajesh Sharma & Ors. vs. State of U.P. & Anr., acknowledging the misuse of Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). This provision, intended to protect women from cruelty,

Supreme Court issues guidelines to prevent misuse of Section 498A IPC in matrimonial cases: Rajesh Sharma & Ors. vs. State of U.P. & Anr. (27 July 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Quashes Rape Charges in Financial Dispute Case: Vineet Kumar vs. State of U.P. (2017)

Date of the Judgment: March 31, 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 287 Judges: A.K. Sikri, J., Ashok Bhushan, J. (authored the judgment) Can a criminal case, specifically one involving serious charges like rape, be quashed if it appears to be a retaliatory measure in a financial dispute? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question

Supreme Court Quashes Rape Charges in Financial Dispute Case: Vineet Kumar vs. State of U.P. (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court quashes attachment order against deceased’s property: U. Subhadramma vs. State of A.P. (2016)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether property of a person who died during a criminal trial can be attached under the Criminal Law Amendment Ordinance, 1944. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law. Case Name: U. Subhadramma & Ors. vs State of A.P. rep. by Pub. Prosecutor & Anr. Judgment Date: 4th July, 2016 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 4th July,

Supreme Court quashes attachment order against deceased’s property: U. Subhadramma vs. State of A.P. (2016) Read Post »

Supreme Court holds Reserve Bank of India not an “establishment” under Contract Labour Act: RBI vs. State (2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 30, 2008 Judges: Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J., Dr. Mukundakam Sharma, J. Is the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) an “establishment” as defined under the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970? This question was at the heart of a legal battle between the Reserve Bank of India and the

Supreme Court holds Reserve Bank of India not an “establishment” under Contract Labour Act: RBI vs. State (2008) Read Post »

Scroll to Top