Special Courts

Supreme Court settles jurisdiction for offences under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India vs. Satyanarayan Bankatlal Malu & Ors. (2024) INSC 319 (19 April 2024)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 190, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 193, Companies Act, 2013, Companies Act, 2013 with Section 435, Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 with Section 236, Special Courts

Supreme Court Clarifies Jurisdiction for Offences under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code Date of the Judgment: 19 April 2024 Citation: (2024) INSC 319 Judges: B.R. Gavai, J. and Sandeep Mehta, J. Can the amendments to the Companies Act, 2013, impact the jurisdiction of courts trying offences under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016? The Supreme […]

Supreme Court settles jurisdiction for offences under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India vs. Satyanarayan Bankatlal Malu & Ors. (2024) INSC 319 (19 April 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Default Bail and Sanction Under UAPA: Judgebir Singh vs. National Investigation Agency (2023)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 167, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 173, Default Bail, Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, J.B. Pardiwala, Judges, National Investigation Agency Act, 2008, National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 with Section 16, Sanction for Prosecution, Special Courts, Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 with Section 43D, Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 with Section 45

Supreme Court Clarifies Default Bail and Sanction Under UAPA: Judgebir Singh vs. National Investigation Agency (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a chargesheet filed without a valid sanction order can be considered a complete chargesheet for the purpose of default bail under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) and whether the filing of chargesheet

Supreme Court Clarifies Default Bail and Sanction Under UAPA: Judgebir Singh vs. National Investigation Agency (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Jurisdiction in Money Laundering Cases: Rana Ayyub vs. Directorate of Enforcement (2023)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 201, J.B. Pardiwala, Judges, Prevention of Money-laundering Act, 2002, Prevention of Money-laundering Act, 2002 with Section 44, Special Courts, Territorial Jurisdiction, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Clarifies Jurisdiction in Money Laundering Cases: Rana Ayyub vs. Directorate of Enforcement (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Determining the territorial jurisdiction of Special Courts in money laundering cases. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Rana Ayyub vs. Directorate of Enforcement Judgment Date: 7 February 2023 Date of the Judgment: 7 February 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 101

Supreme Court Clarifies Jurisdiction in Money Laundering Cases: Rana Ayyub vs. Directorate of Enforcement (2023) Read Post »

Scroll to Top