Companies Act, 1956 with Section 531

Supreme Court Upholds SIDBI’s Actions in Bond Payment Dispute: Small Industries Development Bank of India vs. M/S. Sibco Investment Pvt. Ltd. (2022)

/ Companies Act, 1956, Companies Act, 1956 with Section 441(2), Companies Act, 1956 with Section 531, Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, R. Subhash Reddy, Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934, Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 with Section 45-JA, Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 with Section 45-MB

Supreme Court Upholds SIDBI’s Actions in Bond Payment Dispute: Small Industries Development Bank of India vs. M/S. Sibco Investment Pvt. Ltd. (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether Small Industries Development Bank of India (SIDBI) was justified in withholding payments on bonds due to regulatory directives and concerns over fraudulent transactions. CASE TYPE: Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Case Name: […]

Supreme Court Upholds SIDBI’s Actions in Bond Payment Dispute: Small Industries Development Bank of India vs. M/S. Sibco Investment Pvt. Ltd. (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds RBI’s Authority in Bond Dispute: SIDBI vs. Sibco Investment (2022)

/ Banking Regulation Act, 1949, Banking Regulation Act, 1949 with Section 35-A, Companies Act, 1956, Companies Act, 1956 with Section 441(2), Companies Act, 1956 with Section 531, Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, R. Subhash Reddy, Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934, Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 with Section 45-JA, Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 with Section 45-MB

Supreme Court Upholds RBI’s Authority in Bond Dispute: SIDBI vs. Sibco Investment (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) directives regarding the transfer of bonds are binding on financial institutions. CASE TYPE: Civil Appellate Jurisdiction, Banking Law. Case Name: Small Industries Development Bank of India vs. M/s. Sibco Investment Pvt. Ltd. Judgment

Supreme Court Upholds RBI’s Authority in Bond Dispute: SIDBI vs. Sibco Investment (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Revives Winding Up Proceedings and Denies Sale Deed: IDBI Bank vs. Official Liquidator (2019)

/ Advertising Winding Up Petitions, Ajay Rastogi, Companies (Court) Rules, 1959, Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 with Rule 101, Companies Act, 1956, Companies Act, 1956 with Section 293(1), Companies Act, 1956 with Section 531, Judges, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Winding Up

Supreme Court Revives Winding Up Proceedings and Denies Sale Deed: IDBI Bank vs. Official Liquidator (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether winding up proceedings should be revived and whether a sale deed can be executed based on an agreement to sell. CASE TYPE: Company Law, Insolvency Case Name: IDBI Bank Limited vs. The Official Liquidator, Office of

Supreme Court Revives Winding Up Proceedings and Denies Sale Deed: IDBI Bank vs. Official Liquidator (2019) Read Post »

Scroll to Top