Companies Act, 2013 with Section 212

Supreme Court Upholds Investigation Powers of SFIO Under Companies Act: Serious Fraud Investigation Office vs. Sahara Housing Investment Corporation Limited (26 May 2022)

/ Bela M. Trivedi, Companies Act, 2013, Companies Act, 2013 with Section 212, Companies Act, 2013 with Section 219, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Judges, Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO)

Supreme Court Upholds Investigation Powers of SFIO Under Companies Act Can the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) continue an investigation even after the initially stipulated time has passed? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this crucial question regarding the powers of the SFIO under the Companies Act, 2013. The Court’s decision clarifies the scope […]

Supreme Court Upholds Investigation Powers of SFIO Under Companies Act: Serious Fraud Investigation Office vs. Sahara Housing Investment Corporation Limited (26 May 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Statutory Bail Under Section 167 CrPC: SFIO vs. Rahul Modi (2022)

/ B.R. Gavai, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 167, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 173, Companies Act, 2013, Companies Act, 2013 with Section 212, Companies Act, 2013 with Section 439, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao

Supreme Court Clarifies Statutory Bail Under Section 167 CrPC: SFIO vs. Rahul Modi (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an accused is entitled to statutory bail under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) if the court has not taken cognizance of the complaint before the expiry of the statutory period (60 or 90

Supreme Court Clarifies Statutory Bail Under Section 167 CrPC: SFIO vs. Rahul Modi (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Sets Aside Bail in Serious Fraud Case: SFIO vs. Nittin Johari (2019)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 439, Companies Act, 2013, Companies Act, 2013 with Section 212, Companies Act, 2013 with Section 447, Judges, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, N.V. Ramana

Supreme Court Sets Aside Bail in Serious Fraud Case: SFIO vs. Nittin Johari (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court correctly granted bail to the accused in a case involving serious economic offenses, considering the mandatory conditions under Section 212(6)(ii) of the Companies Act, 2013 and general principles for bail under Section 439 of the

Supreme Court Sets Aside Bail in Serious Fraud Case: SFIO vs. Nittin Johari (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Reopening of IL&FS Accounts: Hari Sankaran vs. Union of India (2019)

/ Companies Act, 2013, Companies Act, 2013 with Section 130, Companies Act, 2013 with Section 212, Companies Act, 2013 with Section 241, Indu Malhotra, Judges, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Upholds Reopening of IL&FS Accounts: Hari Sankaran vs. Union of India (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) can order the reopening of a company’s accounts under Section 130 of the Companies Act, 2013, based on allegations of fraud or mismanagement. CASE TYPE: Corporate Law Case Name: Hari Sankaran vs.

Supreme Court Upholds Reopening of IL&FS Accounts: Hari Sankaran vs. Union of India (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles the timeline for investigation by Serious Fraud Investigation Office in corporate fraud cases: Serious Fraud Investigation Office vs. Rahul Modi and Another (2019)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Companies Act, 2013, Companies Act, 2013 with Section 212, Companies Act, 2013 with Section 435, Judges, Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008, Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008 with Section 43, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Clarifies SFIO Investigation Timelines: Rahul Modi Case (2019) Date of the Judgment: 27 March 2019 Citation: (2019) INSC 282 Judges: Abhay Manohar Sapre, J., Uday Umesh Lalit, J. (Majority Opinion by Uday Umesh Lalit, J., Concurring Opinion by Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.) Can an investigation by the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) become

Supreme Court settles the timeline for investigation by Serious Fraud Investigation Office in corporate fraud cases: Serious Fraud Investigation Office vs. Rahul Modi and Another (2019) Read Post »

Scroll to Top