Constitution of India with Article 227

Supreme Court Upholds Eviction Process for Unauthorized Occupants of Municipal Premises: Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai vs. Vivek V. Gawde (2024)

/ Constitution of India, Constitution of India with Article 226, Constitution of India with Article 227, Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Section 3, Limitation Period, Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 with Section 105B, Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 with Section 105F, Part Performance, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Transfer of Property Act, 1882 with Section 53A, Writ Jurisdiction

Supreme Court Upholds Eviction Process for Unauthorized Occupants of Municipal Premises: Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai vs. Vivek V. Gawde (2024) Date of the Judgment: December 13, 2024 The Supreme Court of India addressed the legality of eviction proceedings initiated by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai against occupants of municipal premises, specifically focusing on […]

Supreme Court Upholds Eviction Process for Unauthorized Occupants of Municipal Premises: Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai vs. Vivek V. Gawde (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the definition of sub-letting under the Delhi Rent Control Act: M/S Puri Investments vs. M/S Young Friends & Co. & Ors. (23 February 2022)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Constitution of India, Constitution of India with Article 227, Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 with Section 14, Eviction, Judges, Sub-letting, Supervisory Jurisdiction, Vineet Saran

Supreme Court Clarifies Sub-letting Under Delhi Rent Control Act: Puri Investments vs. Young Friends & Co. (2022) Date of the Judgment: 23rd February 2022 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 1609 of 2022 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No. 6516/2019) Judges: Justice Vineet Saran and Justice Aniruddha Bose. Can a landlord evict a tenant if

Supreme Court clarifies the definition of sub-letting under the Delhi Rent Control Act: M/S Puri Investments vs. M/S Young Friends & Co. & Ors. (23 February 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies jurisdiction of Armed Forces Tribunal in service matters: Balkrishna Ram vs. Union of India (2020) INSC 12

/ Aniruddha Bose, Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 with Section 14, Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 with Section 34, Constitution of India, Constitution of India with Article 226, Constitution of India with Article 227, Deepak Gupta, Judges

Supreme Court clarifies jurisdiction of Armed Forces Tribunal in service matters: Balkrishna Ram vs. Union of India (2020) INSC 12 Date of the Judgment: January 09, 2020 Citation: (2020) INSC 12 Judges: Deepak Gupta, J. and Aniruddha Bose, J. Can an appeal against a single judge’s order of a High Court be transferred to the

Supreme Court clarifies jurisdiction of Armed Forces Tribunal in service matters: Balkrishna Ram vs. Union of India (2020) INSC 12 Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Termination of Dealership: Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. vs. T. Natarajan (2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Administrative Law, Arbitration, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 34, Constitution of India, Constitution of India with Article 226, Constitution of India with Article 227, Contract Law, Dealership Agreements, Judges, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Upholds Termination of Dealership: Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. vs. T. Natarajan (2018) Date of the Judgment: July 17, 2018 Citation: Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. & Anr. v. T. Natarajan, Civil Appeal No. 6748 of 2018, arising out of SLP (C) No. 33100 of 2015 Judges: Abhay Manohar Sapre, J., Uday Umesh Lalit, J.

Supreme Court Upholds Termination of Dealership: Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. vs. T. Natarajan (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the powers of High Courts in Prevention of Corruption Act cases: Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency Pvt. Ltd. vs. Central Bureau of Investigation (28 March 2018)

/ Adarsh Kumar Goel, Basic Structure of the Constitution, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 482, Constitution of India, Constitution of India with Article 226, Constitution of India with Article 227, Interlocutory Orders, Judges, Navin Sinha, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 19, R.F. Nariman, Stay of Proceedings

Supreme Court Clarifies Powers of High Courts in Corruption Cases: Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency Pvt. Ltd. vs. CBI (2018) Date of the Judgment: 28 March 2018 Citation: Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency Pvt. Ltd. vs. Central Bureau of Investigation (2018) INSC 220 Judges: Adarsh Kumar Goel, J., Navin Sinha, J., R.F. Nariman, J. (Concurring)

Supreme Court clarifies the powers of High Courts in Prevention of Corruption Act cases: Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency Pvt. Ltd. vs. Central Bureau of Investigation (28 March 2018) Read Post »

Scroll to Top