Constitution of India

Supreme Court Commutes Death Sentence in Kidnapping and Murder Case: Swapan Kumar Jha vs. State of Jharkhand (2018)

Supreme Court Commutes Death Sentence in Kidnapping and Murder Case: Swapan Kumar Jha vs. State of Jharkhand (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the death penalty awarded to one of the accused in a kidnapping and murder case was justified, or if it should be commuted to life imprisonment. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Swapan Kumar […]

Supreme Court Commutes Death Sentence in Kidnapping and Murder Case: Swapan Kumar Jha vs. State of Jharkhand (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies effect of stay on conviction in disqualification of legislators: Lok Prahari vs. Election Commission of India (26 September 2018)

Supreme Court clarifies effect of stay on conviction in disqualification of legislators: Lok Prahari vs. Election Commission of India (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a stay of conviction by an appellate court nullifies the disqualification of a legislator under the Representation of the People Act, 1951. CASE TYPE: Public Interest Litigation, Election Law. Case Name: Lok

Supreme Court clarifies effect of stay on conviction in disqualification of legislators: Lok Prahari vs. Election Commission of India (26 September 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Termination of Dealership: Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. vs. T. Natarajan (2018)

Supreme Court Upholds Termination of Dealership: Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. vs. T. Natarajan (2018) Date of the Judgment: July 17, 2018 Citation: Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. & Anr. v. T. Natarajan, Civil Appeal No. 6748 of 2018, arising out of SLP (C) No. 33100 of 2015 Judges: Abhay Manohar Sapre, J., Uday Umesh Lalit, J.

Supreme Court Upholds Termination of Dealership: Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. vs. T. Natarajan (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Differential Dearness Relief for Bank Retirees Based on Retirement Date: United Bank of India vs. United Bank of India Retirees’ Welfare Association (2018)

Supreme Court Upholds Differential Dearness Relief for Bank Retirees Based on Retirement Date LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a distinction in dearness relief can be made between pre and post-November 2002 retirees. CASE TYPE: Service Law/Pension. Case Name: United Bank of India and others vs. United Bank of India Retirees’ Welfare Association and others. [Judgment Date]: May

Supreme Court Upholds Differential Dearness Relief for Bank Retirees Based on Retirement Date: United Bank of India vs. United Bank of India Retirees’ Welfare Association (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the powers of High Courts in Prevention of Corruption Act cases: Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency Pvt. Ltd. vs. Central Bureau of Investigation (28 March 2018)

Supreme Court Clarifies Powers of High Courts in Corruption Cases: Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency Pvt. Ltd. vs. CBI (2018) Date of the Judgment: 28 March 2018 Citation: Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency Pvt. Ltd. vs. Central Bureau of Investigation (2018) INSC 220 Judges: Adarsh Kumar Goel, J., Navin Sinha, J., R.F. Nariman, J. (Concurring)

Supreme Court clarifies the powers of High Courts in Prevention of Corruption Act cases: Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency Pvt. Ltd. vs. Central Bureau of Investigation (28 March 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of State Transport Authority Decision by Majority: State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Mahendra Gupta (2018)

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of State Transport Authority Decision by Majority: State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Mahendra Gupta (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a decision by a multi-member body like the State Transport Authority is valid if it is made by a majority of members present during the hearing, even if one member is transferred before

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of State Transport Authority Decision by Majority: State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Mahendra Gupta (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies applicability of Legal Metrology Act to hotels and restaurants: Federation of Hotel and Restaurant Associations of India vs. Union of India (2017)

Date of the Judgment: December 12, 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 1084 Judges: R.F. Nariman, J., Navin Sinha, J. Can hotels and restaurants charge more than the Maximum Retail Price (MRP) for packaged water bottles? The Supreme Court addressed this question, clarifying the scope of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009, and its applicability to the service

Supreme Court clarifies applicability of Legal Metrology Act to hotels and restaurants: Federation of Hotel and Restaurant Associations of India vs. Union of India (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Chief Justice’s Roster Authority in Judicial Bribery Case: Kamini Jaiswal vs. Union of India (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: The authority of the Chief Justice of India to allocate cases and constitute benches. CASE TYPE: Criminal Writ Petition Case Name: Kamini Jaiswal vs. Union of India & Anr. [Judgment Date]: November 14, 2017 Can a judicial order dictate the composition of a bench in the Supreme Court? This question arose in a

Supreme Court Upholds Chief Justice’s Roster Authority in Judicial Bribery Case: Kamini Jaiswal vs. Union of India (2017) Read Post »

Chief Justice’s Authority: Supreme Court Settles Roster Allocation in Judicial Accountability Case (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Authority of the Chief Justice in allocating cases and constituting benches. CASE TYPE: Public Interest Litigation (Constitutional Law). Case Name: Campaign for Judicial Accountability and Reforms vs. Union of India and Another. Judgment Date: November 10, 2017 Can a two-judge bench direct the Chief Justice of India on how to constitute a bench?

Chief Justice’s Authority: Supreme Court Settles Roster Allocation in Judicial Accountability Case (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies remedy against Lok Adalat awards: Bhargavi Constructions vs. Kothakapu Muthyam Reddy (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a civil suit is maintainable to challenge an award passed by the Lok Adalat or if the only remedy is a writ petition. CASE TYPE: Civil Case Name: Bhargavi Constructions & Anr. vs. Kothakapu Muthyam Reddy & Ors. [Judgment Date]: September 7, 2017 Date of the Judgment: September 7, 2017 Citation: (2017)

Supreme Court clarifies remedy against Lok Adalat awards: Bhargavi Constructions vs. Kothakapu Muthyam Reddy (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court quashes contempt conviction for lack of due process: Rajiv Dawar vs. High Court of Delhi (26 July 2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a conviction for contempt of court can be sustained without providing the contemnor a fair opportunity to present their case and cross-examine witnesses. CASE TYPE: Criminal Contempt Case Name: Rajiv Dawar vs. High Court of Delhi Judgment Date: 26 July 2017 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 26 July 2017 Citation: Not provided

Supreme Court quashes contempt conviction for lack of due process: Rajiv Dawar vs. High Court of Delhi (26 July 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs States to Implement National Food Security Act: Swaraj Abhiyan vs. Union of India (2017) INSC 648 (21 July 2017)

Date of the Judgment: 21 July 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 648 Judges: Madan B. Lokur, J. and N.V. Ramana, J. Can the Central Government ensure that States implement laws passed by the Parliament? The Supreme Court addressed this critical question while hearing a case about the implementation of the National Food Security Act, 2013. The

Supreme Court Directs States to Implement National Food Security Act: Swaraj Abhiyan vs. Union of India (2017) INSC 648 (21 July 2017) Read Post »

Scroll to Top