Constitutional Law with Article 122

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petitions on Aadhaar Act as Money Bill: Beghar Foundation vs. Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) (2021) INSC 12

January 11, 2021 / A.M. Khanwilkar, Ashok Bhushan, B.R. Gavai, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 110, Constitutional Law with Article 122, Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, Judges, Money Bill, Parliamentary Procedure, S. Abdul Nazeer, Speaker's Decision

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petitions on Aadhaar Act as Money Bill Date of the Judgment: January 11, 2021 Citation: (2021) INSC 12 Judges: A.M. Khanwilkar, Ashok Bhushan, S. Abdul Nazeer, B.R. Gavai, and Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud (dissenting). This was a 4:1 majority decision, with Justice Khanwilkar writing the majority opinion and Justice Chandrachud dissenting. […]

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petitions on Aadhaar Act as Money Bill: Beghar Foundation vs. Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) (2021) INSC 12 Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies use of Parliamentary Committee Reports in Public Interest Litigations (2018)

May 9, 2018 / A.M. Khanwilkar, Ashok Bhushan, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 105, Constitutional Law with Article 122, D.Y. Chandrachud, Dipak Misra, Fundamental Rights, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 57, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 74, Judges

Supreme Court Clarifies Use of Parliamentary Committee Reports in Public Interest Litigations (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Admissibility and use of Parliamentary Standing Committee reports in court proceedings. CASE TYPE: Public Interest Litigation, Constitutional Law Case Name: Kalpana Mehta and others v. Union of India and others Judgment Date: May 9, 2018 Introduction Date of the Judgment:

Supreme Court clarifies use of Parliamentary Committee Reports in Public Interest Litigations (2018) Read Post »