Constitutional Law with Article 137

Supreme Court clarifies review jurisdiction in land acquisition cases: Govt. of NCT of Delhi vs. K.L. Rathi Steel S Limited (2024) INSC 454 (17 May 2024)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, Code of Civil Procedure with Order XLVII, Code of Civil Procedure with Section 114, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 137, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Clarifies Review Jurisdiction in Land Acquisition Cases Date of the Judgment: 17 May 2024 Citation: 2024 INSC 454 Judges: Hon’ble Justices Surya Kant, Dipankar Datta, and Ujjal Bhuyan Can a judgment be reviewed simply because a previous legal precedent it relied on was later overruled? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this […]

Supreme Court clarifies review jurisdiction in land acquisition cases: Govt. of NCT of Delhi vs. K.L. Rathi Steel S Limited (2024) INSC 454 (17 May 2024) Read Post »

Curative Petitions: Supreme Court clarifies procedure when Review Petition is dismissed after Open Court Hearing (26 February 2024)

/ Constitution of India, Constitutional Law with Article 137, Constitutional Law with Article 145, Order XLVIII, Supreme Court Rules, 2013, Order XV, Supreme Court Rules, 2013, Supreme Court Rules, 2013

Supreme Court Clarifies Procedure for Curative Petitions After Open Court Review Dismissal LEGAL ISSUE: Procedure for filing curative petitions when the review petition has been dismissed after an open court hearing. CASE TYPE: Civil Procedure Case Name: M/S Brahmaputra Concrete Pipe Industries Etc. Etc. vs. The Assam State Electricity Board and Others Judgment Date: 26

Curative Petitions: Supreme Court clarifies procedure when Review Petition is dismissed after Open Court Hearing (26 February 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Commutes Death Sentence in Kidnapping and Murder Case: Sundar @ Sundarrajan vs. State (21 March 2023)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 235, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 137, Constitutional Law with Article 145, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Hima Kohli, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 65B, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 364A, Judges, Offences Against Human Body, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha

Supreme Court Commutes Death Sentence in Kidnapping and Murder Case: Sundar @ Sundarrajan vs. State (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Review of death penalty and consideration of mitigating circumstances. CASE TYPE: Criminal. Case Name: Sundar @ Sundarrajan vs. State by Inspector of Police. Judgment Date: 21 March 2023. Introduction Date of the Judgment: 21 March 2023 Citation:

Supreme Court Commutes Death Sentence in Kidnapping and Murder Case: Sundar @ Sundarrajan vs. State (21 March 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Commutes Death Sentence in Kidnapping and Murder Case: Sundar vs. State (21 March 2023)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, Code of Criminal Procedure with Section 235, Code of Criminal Procedure with Section 354(3), Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 137, Constitutional Law with Article 145, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Hima Kohli, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 65A, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 65B, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 364A, Judges, Offences Against Human Body, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha

Supreme Court Commutes Death Sentence in Kidnapping and Murder Case: Sundar vs. State (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Review of a death sentence based on errors apparent on the face of the record and the adequacy of sentencing hearings. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Sundar @ Sundarrajan vs. State by Inspector of Police Judgment Date: 21 March

Supreme Court Commutes Death Sentence in Kidnapping and Murder Case: Sundar vs. State (21 March 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Reviews Land Acquisition Judgments: Impact of Indore Development Authority Ruling (17 March 2023)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Code of Civil Procedure, Code of Civil Procedure with Order XLVII Rule 1, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 137, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 24(2), M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013

Supreme Court Reviews Land Acquisition Judgments Post Indore Development Authority LEGAL ISSUE: Review of judgments related to land acquisition following the overruling of Pune Municipal Corporation by Indore Development Authority. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition, Civil Case Name: Govt. of NCT of Delhi Through the Secretary, Land and Building Department & Another vs. M/s. K.L. Rathi

Supreme Court Reviews Land Acquisition Judgments: Impact of Indore Development Authority Ruling (17 March 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of review of land acquisition judgments post the Indore Development Authority ruling (17 March 2023)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Code of Civil Procedure, Code of Civil Procedure with Order XLVII Rule 1, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 137, Judges, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Clarifies Review of Land Acquisition Judgments Post Indore Development Authority LEGAL ISSUE: Scope of review of judgments concerning land acquisition after a key precedent is overruled. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition, Civil Review Case Name: Govt. of NCT of Delhi Through the Secretary, Land and Building Department & Another vs. M/s. K.L. Rathi Steels

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of review of land acquisition judgments post the Indore Development Authority ruling (17 March 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition in Property Dispute: N. Tahera & Anr. vs. Seema Begum & Anr. (30 November 2021)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Aniruddha Bose, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 137, Inherent Jurisdiction, Judges, Supreme Court of India, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition in Property Dispute: N. Tahera & Anr. vs. Seema Begum & Anr. (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Review of a dismissed Special Leave Petition in a property dispute. CASE TYPE: Civil Case Name: N. Tahera & Anr. vs. Seema Begum & Anr. Judgment Date: 30 November 2021 Date of the Judgment: 30

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition in Property Dispute: N. Tahera & Anr. vs. Seema Begum & Anr. (30 November 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Commutes Death Sentence to 30 Years in Gruesome Family Murder Case: Mofil Khan & Anr. vs. The State of Jharkhand (26 November 2021)

/ B. V. Nagarathna, B.R. Gavai, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 137, Constitutional Law with Article 145, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 34, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Offences Against Human Body

Supreme Court Commutes Death Sentence to 30 Years in Gruesome Family Murder Case LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the death penalty should be upheld or commuted to life imprisonment, considering the possibility of reformation and rehabilitation of the convicts. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Mofil Khan & Anr. vs. The State of Jharkhand Judgment Date: 26 November

Supreme Court Commutes Death Sentence to 30 Years in Gruesome Family Murder Case: Mofil Khan & Anr. vs. The State of Jharkhand (26 November 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Death Penalty in Delhi Gang Rape Case: Akshay Kumar Singh’s Review Petition Dismissed (2019)

/ A. S. Bopanna, Ashok Bhushan, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 137, Constitutional Law with Article 145, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 376, Judges, Offences Against Human Body, R. Banumathi, Supreme Court Rules, 2013, Supreme Court Rules, 2013 with Order XLVII Rule 1

Supreme Court Upholds Death Penalty in Delhi Gang Rape Case: Akshay Kumar Singh’s Review Petition Dismissed (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Review of a judgment confirming conviction and death penalty in a criminal case. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Akshay Kumar Singh v. State (NCT of Delhi) Judgment Date: 18 December 2019 Date of the Judgment: 18

Supreme Court Upholds Death Penalty in Delhi Gang Rape Case: Akshay Kumar Singh’s Review Petition Dismissed (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Rafale Deal, Dismisses Review Petitions: Yashwant Sinha vs. CBI (2019)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 154, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 340, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 137, Constitutional Law with Article 32, Fundamental Rights, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 17A, Ranjan Gogoi, Sanjay Kishan Kaul

Supreme Court Upholds Rafale Deal, Dismisses Review Petitions: Yashwant Sinha vs. CBI (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Review of Supreme Court judgment on the legality of the Rafale fighter jet deal. CASE TYPE: Public Interest Litigation (PIL), Criminal Review Case Name: Yashwant Sinha & Ors. vs. Central Bureau of Investigation Through its Director & Anr. Judgment Date:

Supreme Court Upholds Rafale Deal, Dismisses Review Petitions: Yashwant Sinha vs. CBI (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Commutes Death Sentence to Life Imprisonment with 20-Year Cap in Babasaheb Maruti Kamble vs. State of Maharashtra (2018)

/ A.K. Sikri, Ashok Bhushan, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 235, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 354, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 137, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 376, Indira Banerjee, Judges, Offences Against Human Body

Supreme Court Commutes Death Sentence to Life Imprisonment with 20-Year Cap in Babasaheb Maruti Kamble vs. State of Maharashtra (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the death penalty awarded to the accused should be upheld or commuted to life imprisonment. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Babasaheb Maruti Kamble vs. State of Maharashtra Judgment Date: November 1, 2018

Supreme Court Commutes Death Sentence to Life Imprisonment with 20-Year Cap in Babasaheb Maruti Kamble vs. State of Maharashtra (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Nirbhaya Case: Review Petition Dismissed (9 July 2018)

/ Ashok Bhushan, Code of Criminal Procedure, Code of Criminal Procedure with Section 313, Code of Criminal Procedure with Section 391, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 137, Constitutional Law with Article 22, Dipak Misra, Fundamental Rights, Judges, R. Banumathi

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Nirbhaya Case: Review Petition Dismissed (9 July 2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Review of a criminal conviction based on alleged errors. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Mukesh vs. State of NCT of Delhi Judgment Date: 9 July 2018 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 9 July 2018 Citation: Not available in the source

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Nirbhaya Case: Review Petition Dismissed (9 July 2018) Read Post »

Scroll to Top