Constitutional Law with Article 14

Supreme Court Upholds Pension Rights of Retired Cooperative Bank Employees: Punjab State Cooperative Agricultural Development Bank Ltd. vs. The Registrar, Cooperative Societies and Others (2022) INSC 29

/ Abhay S. Oka, Ajay Rastogi, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Constitutional Law with Article 21, Employees Provident Fund Act, 1952, Employees Provident Fund Act, 1952 with Section 17(1C), Employees' Pension Scheme, 1995, Fundamental Rights, Judges, Pension, Service Law, Vested Rights

Supreme Court Upholds Pension Rights of Retired Cooperative Bank Employees Date of the Judgment: 11 January 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 29 Judges: Hon’ble Justices Ajay Rastogi and Abhay S. Oka Can a cooperative bank unilaterally withdraw a pension scheme that its retired employees had been contributing to and benefiting from for decades? The Supreme Court […]

Supreme Court Upholds Pension Rights of Retired Cooperative Bank Employees: Punjab State Cooperative Agricultural Development Bank Ltd. vs. The Registrar, Cooperative Societies and Others (2022) INSC 29 Read Post »

Supreme Court Denies Pension Parity for WALMI Employees: State of Maharashtra vs. Bhagwan (2022)

/ Autonomy of Societies, B.V. Nagarathna, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Judges, M.R. Shah, Pension Benefits, Service Law, Societies Registration Act, 1860, State Government Employees

Supreme Court Denies Pension Parity for WALMI Employees: State of Maharashtra vs. Bhagwan (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether employees of an autonomous body are entitled to pensionary benefits on par with State Government employees. CASE TYPE: Service Law. Case Name: The State of Maharashtra & Anr. vs. Bhagwan & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 10 January 2022 Introduction

Supreme Court Denies Pension Parity for WALMI Employees: State of Maharashtra vs. Bhagwan (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Denies Pension Parity for WALMI Employees: State of Maharashtra vs. Bhagwan (2022)

/ Autonomous Bodies, B.V. Nagarathna, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Fundamental Rights, Judges, M.R. Shah, Parity in Service, Pension Benefits, Service Law, Societies Registration Act, 1860

Supreme Court Denies Pension Parity for WALMI Employees: State of Maharashtra vs. Bhagwan (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether employees of an autonomous body are entitled to pensionary benefits on par with state government employees. CASE TYPE: Service Law. Case Name: The State of Maharashtra & Anr. vs. Bhagwan & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 10 January 2022 Introduction

Supreme Court Denies Pension Parity for WALMI Employees: State of Maharashtra vs. Bhagwan (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Denies Pension Parity for WALMI Employees: State of Maharashtra vs. Bhagwan (2022)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Judges, M.R. Shah, Pension Benefits, Service Law, Service Law with Maharashtra Civil Services Rules

Supreme Court Denies Pension Parity for WALMI Employees: State of Maharashtra vs. Bhagwan (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether employees of an autonomous body are entitled to pensionary benefits on par with State Government employees. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: The State of Maharashtra & Anr. vs. Bhagwan & Ors. Judgment Date: 10 January 2022 Introduction

Supreme Court Denies Pension Parity for WALMI Employees: State of Maharashtra vs. Bhagwan (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Normalization of Marks for UP Police Sub-Inspector Exam: State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Atul Kumar Dwivedi (2022) INSC 24 (7 January 2022)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Eligibility Criteria, Judges, Normalization of Marks, Recruitment, Service Law, U.P. Sub Inspector and Inspector (Civil Police) Service Rules, 2015, U.P. Sub Inspector and Inspector (Civil Police) Service Rules, 2015 with Rule 15, Uday Umesh Lalit, Vineet Saran

Supreme Court Upholds Normalization of Marks for UP Police Sub-Inspector Exam LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the normalization of marks for a multi-session exam should be applied before determining eligibility or only for preparing the final merit list. CASE TYPE: Service Law – Recruitment Case Name: State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. vs. Atul Kumar Dwivedi &

Supreme Court Upholds Normalization of Marks for UP Police Sub-Inspector Exam: State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Atul Kumar Dwivedi (2022) INSC 24 (7 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court allows OBC and EWS Reservations for NEET Admissions 2021-22: Neil Aurelio Nunes & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors. (2022) INSC 21 (07 January 2022)

/ AS Bopanna, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Education Law, Fundamental Rights, Judges, NEET Admissions, Reservation Policy

Date of the Judgment: 07 January 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 21 Judges: Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J and AS Bopanna J. Can reservations for Other Backward Classes (OBC) and Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) be implemented in the All India Quota (AIQ) seats for the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET)? This question was at the

Supreme Court allows OBC and EWS Reservations for NEET Admissions 2021-22: Neil Aurelio Nunes & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors. (2022) INSC 21 (07 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Electricity Duty on Charitable Educational Institutions: State of Maharashtra vs. Shri Vile Parle Kelvani Mandal (2022)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Exemption Provisions, Judges, M. R. Shah, Maharashtra Electricity Duty Act, 2016, Maharashtra Electricity Duty Act, 2016 with Section 3, Sanjiv Khanna

Supreme Court Upholds Electricity Duty on Charitable Educational Institutions: State of Maharashtra vs. Shri Vile Parle Kelvani Mandal (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether charitable educational institutions are exempt from paying electricity duty under the Maharashtra Electricity Duty Act, 2016. CASE TYPE: Tax Law Case Name: The State of Maharashtra vs. Shri Vile Parle Kelvani Mandal &

Supreme Court Upholds Electricity Duty on Charitable Educational Institutions: State of Maharashtra vs. Shri Vile Parle Kelvani Mandal (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Gujarat Water Board’s Decision on Daily Wage Pay Scales: Rajesh Pravinchandra Rajyaguru vs. Gujarat Water Supply & Sewerage Board (2021)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Fundamental Rights, Judges, M. R. Shah, Pay Scales, Service Law, Service Law with Government Resolutions

Supreme Court Upholds Gujarat Water Board’s Decision on Daily Wage Pay Scales LEGAL ISSUE: Whether daily wage employees of the Gujarat Water Supply & Sewerage Board are entitled to pay scale benefits under government resolutions not specifically adopted by the Board. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Rajesh Pravinchandra Rajyaguru vs. Gujarat Water Supply &

Supreme Court Upholds Gujarat Water Board’s Decision on Daily Wage Pay Scales: Rajesh Pravinchandra Rajyaguru vs. Gujarat Water Supply & Sewerage Board (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles horizontal reservation for women in Madhya Pradesh Assistant Professor Selections (December 16, 2021)

/ Assistant Professor Recruitment, Bela M. Trivedi, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Horizontal Reservation, Judges, Madhya Pradesh Lok Seva (Anusuchit Jatiyon, Anusuchit Jan Jatiyon Aur Anya Pichhada Vargon Ke Liye Arakshan) Adhiniyam, 1994, Madhya Pradesh Lok Seva (Anusuchit Jatiyon, Anusuchit Jan Jatiyon Aur Anya Pichhada Vargon Ke Liye Arakshan) Adhiniyam, 1994 with Section 4(4), Madhya Pradesh Lok Seva (Mahilaon Ke Liye Padon Ka Arakshan) Niyam, 1997, Madhya Pradesh Lok Seva (Mahilaon Ke Liye Padon Ka Arakshan) Niyam, 1997 with Rule 3, Reservation Policy, Right to Equality, S. Ravindra Bhat, Service Law, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Clarifies Horizontal Reservation in Assistant Professor Selections LEGAL ISSUE: Whether Other Backward Class (OBC) female candidates who score higher than General Category women in the Assistant Professor selection process can be placed in the unreserved female category. CASE TYPE: Service Law, Reservation Policy Case Name: Sadhana Singh Dangi & Others vs. Pinki Asati

Supreme Court settles horizontal reservation for women in Madhya Pradesh Assistant Professor Selections (December 16, 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies rules for compassionate appointment: Bheemesh vs. Department of Education (2021)

/ Compassionate Appointment, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Constitutional Law with Article 16, Hemant Gupta, Judges, Karnataka State Civil Services Act, 1978, Karnataka State Civil Services Act, 1978 with Section 3(1), Karnataka State Civil Services Act, 1978 with Section 8, Retrospective Application of Rules, Service Law, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Clarifies Compassionate Appointment Rules: Bheemesh vs. Govt. of Education (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether amendments to compassionate appointment rules apply retrospectively. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: The Secretary to Govt. Department of Education (Primary) & Ors. vs. Bheemesh Alias Bheemappa [Judgment Date]: December 16, 2021 Date of the Judgment: December 16, 2021 Citation:

Supreme Court clarifies rules for compassionate appointment: Bheemesh vs. Department of Education (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles seniority dispute for Junior Engineers in Uttar Pradesh: Ajay Kumar Shukla vs. Arvind Rai (2021)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Constitutional Law with Article 16, D.Y. Chandrachud, Fundamental Rights, Judges, Right to be Considered for Promotion, Seniority Rules, Service Law, Vikram Nath

Supreme Court settles seniority dispute for Junior Engineers in Uttar Pradesh Date of the Judgment: 08 December 2021 Citation: 2021 INSC 730 Judges: Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, J., Vikram Nath, J., B.V. Nagarathna, J. Can a seniority list be prepared based on the date of receipt of select lists instead of merit? The Supreme Court of

Supreme Court settles seniority dispute for Junior Engineers in Uttar Pradesh: Ajay Kumar Shukla vs. Arvind Rai (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds RBI’s Restrictions on Merchanting Trade of Banned Goods: Akshay N Patel vs. Reserve Bank of India (2021)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Constitutional Law with Article 19(1)(g), Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999, Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 with Section 10(4), Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 with Section 11(1), Foreign Trade Policy, Fundamental Rights, Judges, Regulatory Law, Reserve Bank of India, Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Upholds RBI’s Restrictions on Merchanting Trade of Banned Goods: Akshay N Patel vs. Reserve Bank of India (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) can restrict merchanting trade transactions (MTT) for goods whose import or export is banned under India’s Foreign Trade Policy (FTP). CASE TYPE: Constitutional Law, Regulatory Law,

Supreme Court Upholds RBI’s Restrictions on Merchanting Trade of Banned Goods: Akshay N Patel vs. Reserve Bank of India (2021) Read Post »

Scroll to Top