Constitutional Law with Article 14

Supreme Court Upholds Experience Marks for Outsourced Employees: Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University vs. Monika (2024)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Constitutional Law with Article 16, Experience Marks, Outsourced Employees, Service Law

Supreme Court Upholds Experience Marks for Outsourced Employees: Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University vs. Monika (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether outsourced employees are eligible for experience marks in direct recruitment. CASE TYPE: Service Law. Case Name: Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University vs. Monika & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 29 November 2024 Date of the Judgment: […]

Supreme Court Upholds Experience Marks for Outsourced Employees: Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University vs. Monika (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Denies Notional Financial Benefits Post-Retirement: Government of West Bengal vs. Dr. Amal Satpathi (2024)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Constitutional Law with Article 16(1), Fundamental Rights, Promotion, Retirement Benefits, Service Law, Service Law with Rule 54(1)(a), West Bengal Service Rules

Supreme Court Denies Notional Financial Benefits Post-Retirement: Government of West Bengal vs. Dr. Amal Satpathi (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an employee is entitled to notional financial benefits of a promotional post after retirement when the promotion was recommended before retirement but not actually granted due to administrative delays. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Government

Supreme Court Denies Notional Financial Benefits Post-Retirement: Government of West Bengal vs. Dr. Amal Satpathi (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Strikes Down Preferential Land Allotment Policy for Elites: State of Andhra Pradesh vs. Dr. Rao, V.B.J. Chelikani (25 November 2024)

/ Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Alienation of State Lands & Land Revenue Rules, 1975, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Fundamental Rights, Land Allotment, Land Laws

Supreme Court Strikes Down Preferential Land Allotment Policy for Elites Date of the Judgment: 25 November 2024 Citation: 2024 INSC 894 Judges: Sanjiv Khanna, CJI., Dipankar Datta, J. Can a government allot public land at discounted rates to its own functionaries? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question, examining the legality of a

Supreme Court Strikes Down Preferential Land Allotment Policy for Elites: State of Andhra Pradesh vs. Dr. Rao, V.B.J. Chelikani (25 November 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court allows counting of work-charged service for Proficiency Step-Up Scheme: Gurmeet Singh vs. State of Punjab (2024)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Service Law, Service Law with Government Circular dated 1st December, 1988, Service Law with Policy Circular dated 13th March, 1996, Work-Charged Employees

Supreme Court Allows Counting of Work-Charged Service for Proficiency Step-Up Scheme: Gurmeet Singh vs. State of Punjab (2024) Date of the Judgment: November 18, 2024 Citation: 2024 INSC 872 Judges: Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J., Sandeep Mehta, J. Can prior service in a work-charged establishment be counted towards benefits under the Proficiency Step-Up Scheme? The Supreme

Supreme Court allows counting of work-charged service for Proficiency Step-Up Scheme: Gurmeet Singh vs. State of Punjab (2024) Read Post »

Compassionate Appointment Denied, but Ex-Gratia Relief Granted: Supreme Court Decision in Haryana Police Case (2024)

/ Compassionate Appointment, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Fundamental Rights, Service Law, Service Law with Haryana Compassionate Assistance Rules, 2006

Supreme Court Denies Compassionate Appointment but Grants Ex-Gratia Relief in Haryana Police Case (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a dependent of a deceased government employee is entitled to compassionate appointment after a significant delay in attaining majority, and whether the state can be directed to grant ex-gratia compensation if the compassionate appointment is denied. CASE TYPE:

Compassionate Appointment Denied, but Ex-Gratia Relief Granted: Supreme Court Decision in Haryana Police Case (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Settles the Independence of Arbitrators in Public-Private Contracts (2024)

/ Appointment of Arbitrators, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 12, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 18, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Indian Contract Act, 1872, Indian Contract Act, 1872 with Section 23, Indian Contract Act, 1872 with Section 28

Supreme Court Clarifies Independence of Arbitrators in Public-Private Contracts (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an appointment process which allows a party who has an interest in the dispute to unilaterally appoint a sole arbitrator or curate a panel of arbitrators is valid in law. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: Central Organisation for Railway Electrification v.

Supreme Court Settles the Independence of Arbitrators in Public-Private Contracts (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Settles the Law on Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrators in Public-Private Contracts: Central Organisation for Railway Electrification vs. ECI-SPIC-SMO-MCML (2024) INSC 857 (08 November 2024)

/ Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 12(5), Arbitration Law with Section 18, Arbitrator Appointment, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Contract Law, Contract Law with Section 23

Supreme Court Clarifies Independence of Arbitrators in Public-Private Contracts (2024) INSC 857 LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an arbitration clause allowing one party to unilaterally appoint an arbitrator is valid. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law, Contract Law, Public-Private Contracts CASE NAME: Central Organisation for Railway Electrification vs. M/s ECI SPIC SMO MCML (JV) [Judgment Date]: 08 November 2024

Supreme Court Settles the Law on Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrators in Public-Private Contracts: Central Organisation for Railway Electrification vs. ECI-SPIC-SMO-MCML (2024) INSC 857 (08 November 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Powers of DRI Officers in Customs Duty Recovery: Commissioner of Customs vs. Canon India Pvt. Ltd. (2024)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Customs Act, 1962, Customs Act, 1962 with Section 2(34), Customs Act, 1962 with Section 28, Powers of Customs Officers

Supreme Court Clarifies Powers of DRI Officers in Customs Duty Recovery: Commissioner of Customs vs. Canon India Pvt. Ltd. (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Scope of authority of Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) officers to issue show cause notices for customs duty recovery. CASE TYPE: Customs Law, Tax Law Case Name: Commissioner of Customs vs. M/s Canon

Supreme Court Clarifies Powers of DRI Officers in Customs Duty Recovery: Commissioner of Customs vs. Canon India Pvt. Ltd. (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Rules of the Game in Public Employment: Tej Prakash Pathak vs. Rajasthan High Court (2024)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Constitutional Law with Article 16, Fundamental Rights, Public Employment, Recruitment Rules, Service Law, Service Law with Article 309

Supreme Court Clarifies Rules of the Game in Public Employment: Tej Prakash Pathak vs. Rajasthan High Court (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Can the selection procedure for public employment be changed after the recruitment process has begun? CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Tej Prakash Pathak & Ors. vs. Rajasthan High Court & Ors. [Judgment Date]: November

Supreme Court Clarifies Rules of the Game in Public Employment: Tej Prakash Pathak vs. Rajasthan High Court (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Addresses Compensation for Vacant Medical Seats Due to Interim Orders: Ramkrishna Medical College vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2024)

/ Civil Procedure Law, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Interim Orders, Judicial Review, Restitution

Supreme Court Addresses Compensation for Vacant Medical Seats Due to Interim Orders: Ramkrishna Medical College vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2024) Date of the Judgment: 7th November 2024 Citation: 2024 INSC 845 Judges: B.R. Gavai, J. and K.V. Viswanathan, J. Can interim court orders, intended to protect individual student interests, inadvertently harm educational institutions? The

Supreme Court Addresses Compensation for Vacant Medical Seats Due to Interim Orders: Ramkrishna Medical College vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2024) Read Post »

Royalty Calculation on Minerals: Supreme Court Examines Compounding Effect in Kirloskar Ferrous Industries vs. Union of India (2024)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Mineral Concession Rules, Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 with Section 9

Supreme Court Addresses Royalty Calculation in Mining: Kirloskar Ferrous Industries vs. Union of India (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the method of calculating royalty on minerals, which includes previous royalty payments in the base calculation, is arbitrary and violates Article 14 of the Constitution. CASE TYPE: Mining Law, Mineral Concession Case Name: Kirloskar Ferrous Industries Limited

Royalty Calculation on Minerals: Supreme Court Examines Compounding Effect in Kirloskar Ferrous Industries vs. Union of India (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Regulatory Powers of Madarsa Act: Anjum Kadari & Anr. vs. Union of India & Ors. (2024) INSC 831 (05 November 2024)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Education Law, Education Law with UGC Act, 1956, Fundamental Rights, Regulatory Framework for Education, Rights of Minorities

Supreme Court Upholds Madarsa Act, Emphasizes Regulatory Powers and Minority Rights Date of the Judgment: 05 November 2024 Citation: (2024) INSC 831 Judges: Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI, J B Pardiwala, J, Manoj Misra, J Can the state regulate minority educational institutions while respecting their rights? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this critical

Supreme Court Upholds Regulatory Powers of Madarsa Act: Anjum Kadari & Anr. vs. Union of India & Ors. (2024) INSC 831 (05 November 2024) Read Post »

Scroll to Top