Constitutional Law with Article 142

Supreme Court Orders Fresh Compensation for Land Acquisition Delay: Loonkaran Gandhi vs. State of Maharashtra (2023)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 11, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 48-A, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 9, Nagpur Improvement Trust Act, 1936, Nagpur Improvement Trust Act, 1936 with Section 39, Nagpur Improvement Trust Act, 1936 with Section 67, Right to Property

Supreme Court Orders Fresh Compensation for Land Acquisition Delay: Loonkaran Gandhi vs. State of Maharashtra (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of compensation for land acquired under the Nagpur Improvement Trust Act, 1936, with significant delays. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition, Civil Law Case Name: Loonkaran Gandhi (D) Thr. Lr. vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors. [Judgment Date]: […]

Supreme Court Orders Fresh Compensation for Land Acquisition Delay: Loonkaran Gandhi vs. State of Maharashtra (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the interpretation of Section 14(3) of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 in eviction cases: Ravi Khandelwal vs. M/S. Taluka Stores (2023) INSC 615 (11 July 2023)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Eviction Suit, Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950, Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 with Section 14(3), Rent Control

Supreme Court clarifies the interpretation of Section 14(3) of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 in eviction cases: Ravi Khandelwal vs. M/S. Taluka Stores (2023) INSC 615 (11 July 2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of Section 14(3) of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 regarding the restriction on

Supreme Court clarifies the interpretation of Section 14(3) of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 in eviction cases: Ravi Khandelwal vs. M/S. Taluka Stores (2023) INSC 615 (11 July 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Notional Promotion for Disabled Employee: RBI vs. A.K. Nair (2023)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Constitutional Law with Article 16, Fundamental Rights, Reservation in Promotions, Service Law, Service Law with Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995, Service Law with Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016

Supreme Court Directs Notional Promotion for Disabled Employee: RBI vs. A.K. Nair (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether persons with disabilities are entitled to reservation in promotions, and whether a disabled candidate should be given the same relaxation in standards as SC/ST candidates. CASE TYPE: Service Law, Disability Rights Case Name: Reserve Bank of India & Ors.

Supreme Court Directs Notional Promotion for Disabled Employee: RBI vs. A.K. Nair (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court awards compensation to lecturers denied reinstatement: K.J. Somaiya Medical College vs. Maharashtra University of Health Sciences (2023)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Compensation, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Judges, Medical Council of India, Minimum Qualifications for Teachers in Medical Institutions Regulations, 1998, Rajesh Bindal, Reinstatement, Retroactive Application of Regulations, Service Law

Supreme Court awards compensation to lecturers denied reinstatement: K.J. Somaiya Medical College vs. Maharashtra University of Health Sciences (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether lecturers terminated due to lack of qualifications as per later regulations are entitled to reinstatement or compensation when they were qualified at the time of their initial appointment. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case

Supreme Court awards compensation to lecturers denied reinstatement: K.J. Somaiya Medical College vs. Maharashtra University of Health Sciences (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court awards compensation to lecturers denied reinstatement: K.J. Somaiya Medical College vs. Maharashtra University of Health Sciences (2023)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Compensation, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Judges, Rajesh Bindal, Reinstatement, Service Law, Termination of Employment

Supreme Court awards compensation to lecturers denied reinstatement: K.J. Somaiya Medical College vs. Maharashtra University of Health Sciences (2023) Date of the Judgment: May 19, 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 563 Judges: Abhay S. Oka, J., Rajesh Bindal, J. Can a medical college terminate lecturers who were initially qualified but later deemed unqualified by updated regulations?

Supreme Court awards compensation to lecturers denied reinstatement: K.J. Somaiya Medical College vs. Maharashtra University of Health Sciences (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Grants Divorce by Mutual Consent and Decides Alimony: Mansi Khatri vs. Gaurav Khatri (2023)

/ Ahsanuddin Amanullah, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 125, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 with Section 13(1), Judges, Sanjay Kishan Kaul

Supreme Court Grants Divorce by Mutual Consent and Decides Alimony: Mansi Khatri vs. Gaurav Khatri (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of permanent alimony and granting divorce by mutual consent using powers under Article 142 of the Constitution of India. CASE TYPE: Matrimonial Dispute/Transfer Petition Case Name: Mansi Khatri vs. Gaurav Khatri [Judgment Date]: 19 May 2023

Supreme Court Grants Divorce by Mutual Consent and Decides Alimony: Mansi Khatri vs. Gaurav Khatri (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Grants Divorce by Mutual Consent and Settles Alimony in Mansi Khatri vs. Gaurav Khatri (2023)

/ Ahsanuddin Amanullah, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 125, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 with Section 13(1), Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 323, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 354, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 498A, Judges, Sanjay Kishan Kaul

Supreme Court Grants Divorce by Mutual Consent and Settles Alimony in Mansi Khatri vs. Gaurav Khatri (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Granting divorce by mutual consent and determining permanent alimony. CASE TYPE: Matrimonial Dispute Case Name: Mansi Khatri vs. Gaurav Khatri [Judgment Date]: May 19, 2023 Date of the Judgment: May 19, 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 562

Supreme Court Grants Divorce by Mutual Consent and Settles Alimony in Mansi Khatri vs. Gaurav Khatri (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Powers Under Article 142 in Divorce Cases: Shilpa Sailesh vs. Varun Sreenivasan (2023)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Divorce Law, Family Law, Fundamental Rights, Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 with Section 13(1)(i-a), Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 with Section 13B, J.K. Maheshwari, Judges, Matrimonial Disputes, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Sanjiv Khanna, Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Clarifies Powers Under Article 142 in Divorce Cases: Shilpa Sailesh vs. Varun Sreenivasan (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Scope and extent of the Supreme Court’s power under Article 142 of the Constitution of India to grant divorce, including waiving the mandatory waiting period for mutual consent divorce and granting divorce in cases of irretrievable breakdown

Supreme Court Clarifies Powers Under Article 142 in Divorce Cases: Shilpa Sailesh vs. Varun Sreenivasan (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Denies Transfer of Divorce Case: Delma Lubna Coelho vs. Edmond Clint Fernandes (2023)

/ Aravind Kumar, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Divorce Proceedings, Family Law, Family Law with Article 142, Judges, Rajesh Bindal, Transfer of Matrimonial Cases

Supreme Court Denies Transfer of Divorce Case: Delma Lubna Coelho vs. Edmond Clint Fernandes (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Transfer of matrimonial proceedings from one state to another. CASE TYPE: Matrimonial Dispute Case Name: Delma Lubna Coelho vs. Edmond Clint Fernandes Judgment Date: 18 April 2023 Date of the Judgment: 18 April 2023 Citation: Not Available Judges:

Supreme Court Denies Transfer of Divorce Case: Delma Lubna Coelho vs. Edmond Clint Fernandes (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Absorption of Long-Serving Employees: State of Bihar vs. Jawahar Lal Ram (2023)

/ Absorption, Aravind Kumar, B.R. Gavai, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Judges, Regularization, Service Law, Service Law with Bihar Intermediate Education Council (Repeal) Act, 2007

Supreme Court Directs Absorption of Long-Serving Employees: State of Bihar vs. Jawahar Lal Ram (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether employees working for an extended period on contract basis are entitled to absorption into permanent positions. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: The State of Bihar and Others vs. Jawahar Lal Ram and Others [Judgment Date]: April

Supreme Court Directs Absorption of Long-Serving Employees: State of Bihar vs. Jawahar Lal Ram (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Family Dispute: Hemantbhai Balvantbhai Patel vs. State of Gujarat (24 March 2023)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Criminal Law, Judges, Krishna Murari, M.R. Shah, Offences Against Property, Quashing of FIR

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Family Dispute: Hemantbhai Balvantbhai Patel vs. State of Gujarat (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether criminal proceedings should be quashed in a family dispute where the parties are willing to settle and a forensic report suggests no forgery. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Hemantbhai Balvantbhai Patel and Another vs. The State

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Family Dispute: Hemantbhai Balvantbhai Patel vs. State of Gujarat (24 March 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Consumer Protection Rules: Ministry of Consumer Affairs vs. Dr. Mahindra Bhaskar Limaye & Ors. (3 March 2023)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Consumer Protection Act, 2019, Consumer Protection Law, Consumer Protection Rules, 2020, Judges, M. R. Shah, M.M. Sundresh

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Consumer Protection Rules: Ministry of Consumer Affairs vs. Dr. Mahindra Bhaskar Limaye & Ors. (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Validity of rules regarding qualifications and appointment procedures for members of State and District Consumer Commissions. CASE TYPE: Consumer Protection Law Case Name: The Secretary Ministry of Consumer Affairs vs. Dr.

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Consumer Protection Rules: Ministry of Consumer Affairs vs. Dr. Mahindra Bhaskar Limaye & Ors. (3 March 2023) Read Post »

Scroll to Top