Constitutional Law with Article 142

Supreme Court Approves Resolution Plan for Reliance Home Finance Limited, Protecting Small Debenture Holders

/ Aravind Kumar, B.R. Gavai, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Civil Procedure Code, 1908 with Section 151, Constitution of India, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Judges

Supreme Court Approves Resolution Plan for Reliance Home Finance Limited, Protecting Small Debenture Holders LEGAL ISSUE: Approval of a Resolution Plan (RP) for a company undergoing financial distress, specifically concerning the rights of debenture holders. CASE TYPE: Corporate Insolvency/Finance Case Name: Authum Investment and Infrastructure Limited v. R.K. Mohatta Family Trust and Others [Judgment Date]: […]

Supreme Court Approves Resolution Plan for Reliance Home Finance Limited, Protecting Small Debenture Holders Read Post »

Supreme Court Approves Resolution Plan for Reliance Home Finance Limited, Protecting Small Debenture Holders (2023)

/ Aravind Kumar, B.R. Gavai, Civil Procedure Code, Civil Procedure Code with Section 151, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Corporate Law, Debenture Holders Rights, Insolvency, Judges, Resolution Plan

Supreme Court Approves Resolution Plan for Reliance Home Finance Limited, Protecting Small Debenture Holders (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Approval of a Resolution Plan (RP) for a financially distressed company, specifically concerning the rights of debenture holders. CASE TYPE: Corporate Insolvency/Finance Case Name: Authum Investment and Infrastructure Limited v. R.K. Mohatta Family Trust and Others [Judgment Date]:

Supreme Court Approves Resolution Plan for Reliance Home Finance Limited, Protecting Small Debenture Holders (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court penalizes Medical College for defying stay order: National Medical Commission vs. Annasaheb Chudaman Patil Memorial Medical College (2023) INSC 102

/ Constitution of India, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Indian Medical Council Act, 1956, Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 with Section 11, J B Pardiwala, Judges, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha

Supreme Court penalizes Medical College for defying stay order: National Medical Commission vs. Annasaheb Chudaman Patil Memorial Medical College (2023) INSC 102 LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a medical college can admit students after the Supreme Court has stayed the High Court’s order permitting such admissions. CASE TYPE: Education Law, Medical Admissions Case Name: National Medical Commission

Supreme Court penalizes Medical College for defying stay order: National Medical Commission vs. Annasaheb Chudaman Patil Memorial Medical College (2023) INSC 102 Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Medical College Penalty for Unauthorized Admissions: National Medical Commission vs. Annasaheb Chudaman Patil Memorial Medical College (2023)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Indian Medical Council Act, 1956, Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 with Section 11, J B Pardiwala, Judges, National Medical Commission Act, 2019, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Powers of National Medical Commission, Recognition of Medical Qualifications, Regulation of Medical Education

Supreme Court Upholds Medical College Penalty for Unauthorized Admissions: National Medical Commission vs. Annasaheb Chudaman Patil Memorial Medical College (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a medical college can admit students after a stay order from the Supreme Court, and what are the consequences for such actions? CASE TYPE: Education Law, Medical Admissions Case Name: National Medical

Supreme Court Upholds Medical College Penalty for Unauthorized Admissions: National Medical Commission vs. Annasaheb Chudaman Patil Memorial Medical College (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Overturns High Court in Specific Performance Case: C. Haridasan vs. Anappath Parakkattu Vasudeva Kurup (2023)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Judges, M.R. Shah, Specific Performance of Contract, Specific Relief Act, 1963, Specific Relief Act, 1963 with Section 16(c), Specific Relief Act, 1963 with Section 20

Supreme Court Overturns High Court in Specific Performance Case: C. Haridasan vs. Anappath Parakkattu Vasudeva Kurup (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a court should grant specific performance of a contract for the sale of land where the buyer has not paid the full consideration or taken steps to fulfill their obligations under the contract. CASE TYPE:

Supreme Court Overturns High Court in Specific Performance Case: C. Haridasan vs. Anappath Parakkattu Vasudeva Kurup (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Specific Performance Decree, Orders Additional Payment: C. Haridasan vs. Anappath Parakkattu Vasudeva Kurup (2023)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Judges, M.R. Shah, Specific Relief Act, 1963, Specific Relief Act, 1963 with Section 16, Specific Relief Act, 1963 with Section 20

Supreme Court Upholds Specific Performance Decree, Orders Additional Payment: C. Haridasan vs. Anappath Parakkattu Vasudeva Kurup (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a decree for specific performance of a contract for sale of land can be granted, and what considerations should guide the court’s discretion, especially when the market value of the property has increased. CASE TYPE:

Supreme Court Upholds Specific Performance Decree, Orders Additional Payment: C. Haridasan vs. Anappath Parakkattu Vasudeva Kurup (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court allows appointment of Health Workers despite delayed registration: Laxmi Saroj vs. State of UP (2022)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Hima Kohli, Judges, M. R. Shah, Recruitment, Service Law, Service Law with Narender Singh vs. State of Haryana

Supreme Court allows appointment of Health Workers despite delayed registration: Laxmi Saroj vs. State of UP (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether candidates for government jobs can be denied appointment due to a delay in receiving a registration certificate from the concerned authority, when the delay is not attributable to the candidate. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case

Supreme Court allows appointment of Health Workers despite delayed registration: Laxmi Saroj vs. State of UP (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Grants Pensionary Benefits to Women Air Force Officers: Wg Cdr A U Tayyaba (Retd) vs. Union of India (2022)

/ Armed Forces, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Fundamental Rights, Hima Kohli, J B Pardiwala, Judges, Pensionary Benefits, Permanent Commission, Service Law

Supreme Court Grants Pensionary Benefits to Women Air Force Officers: Wg Cdr A U Tayyaba (Retd) vs. Union of India (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether women Short Service Commissioned Officers (SSCOs) of the Indian Air Force (IAF), who were not part of the original litigation, are entitled to the same benefits as those who were, specifically

Supreme Court Grants Pensionary Benefits to Women Air Force Officers: Wg Cdr A U Tayyaba (Retd) vs. Union of India (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Compensation for Project Affected Families in Narmada Bachao Andolan Case (22 September 2022)

/ Compensation, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Hima Kohli, Judges, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Resettlement and Rehabilitation, Resettlement and Rehabilitation Policy

Supreme Court Clarifies Compensation for Project Affected Families in Narmada Bachao Andolan Case (22 September 2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Clarification of compensation for project-affected families. CASE TYPE: Civil, Resettlement and Rehabilitation. Case Name: Narmada Bachao Andolan and Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors. Judgment Date: 22 September 2022 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 22 September

Supreme Court Clarifies Compensation for Project Affected Families in Narmada Bachao Andolan Case (22 September 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Re-Medical Examination Timelines for Civil Services: Union of India vs. K. Rajashekhara Reddy (2022) INSC 538

/ Ajay Rastogi, Civil Services Examination Rules, 2014, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Judges, Re-medical Examination, Rule 7(a)(vii) of Appendix-III of the CSE Rules, 2014, Service Law, Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Clarifies Re-Medical Examination Timelines for Civil Services: Union of India vs. K. Rajashekhara Reddy (2022) INSC 538 LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of rules regarding re-medical examinations for civil service candidates declared temporarily unfit. CASE TYPE: Service Law. Case Name: Union of India vs. K. Rajashekhara Reddy. [Judgment Date]: 14 June 2022 Introduction Date of

Supreme Court Clarifies Re-Medical Examination Timelines for Civil Services: Union of India vs. K. Rajashekhara Reddy (2022) INSC 538 Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision but Grants Relief to Student with Learning Disability: Naman Verma vs. The Director, IIT Bombay (2022)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Disability Law, Judges, Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995, Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, S. Ravindra Bhat, Sudhanshu Dhulia, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision but Grants Relief to Student with Learning Disability LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a student with a learning disability, specifically Dyscalculia, is entitled to relief under the Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995. CASE TYPE: Education Law, Disability Rights. Case Name: Naman Verma vs. The Director, The Indian Institute of Technology Bombay

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision but Grants Relief to Student with Learning Disability: Naman Verma vs. The Director, IIT Bombay (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Enhances Dam Safety Measures for Mullaperiyar Dam: Implementation of Dam Safety Act, 2021 (08 April 2022)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, Abhay S. Oka, C.T. Ravikumar, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Dam Safety Act, 2021, Dam Safety Act, 2021 with Section 24, Dam Safety Act, 2021 with Section 9, Judges, National Dam Safety Authority

Supreme Court Strengthens Mullaperiyar Dam Oversight: Dam Safety Act Implementation (2022) Date of the Judgment: 08 April 2022 Citation: Not Available Judges: A.M. Khanwilkar, J., Abhay S. Oka, J., C.T. Ravikumar, J. Is the existing supervisory committee for the Mullaperiyar Dam sufficient to ensure its safety? The Supreme Court addressed this critical question in light

Supreme Court Enhances Dam Safety Measures for Mullaperiyar Dam: Implementation of Dam Safety Act, 2021 (08 April 2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top